黑盒软件测试技术分析:一个案例研究

Mumtaz Ahmad Khan, M. Sadiq
{"title":"黑盒软件测试技术分析:一个案例研究","authors":"Mumtaz Ahmad Khan, M. Sadiq","doi":"10.1109/CTIT.2011.6107931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software testing is a process of verifying and validating that a software application or program works as per the users expectations. It is used to find out the important defects, flaws, or errors in the application code. In this paper we have developed a tool to generate different test cases automatically. To show the validity of the tool, we have considered the line equation problem and generated different test cases, and finally we conclude that Robustness Technique is better than Boundary Value Analysis, because the expected output (number of times) in case of Robustness Technique for intersecting lines, parallel lines and coincident lines are 12, 12 and 1 respectively while in case of Boundary Value Analysis it is 8, 8 and 1 respectively.","PeriodicalId":233698,"journal":{"name":"The 2011 International Conference and Workshop on Current Trends in Information Technology (CTIT 11)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of black box software testing techniques: A case study\",\"authors\":\"Mumtaz Ahmad Khan, M. Sadiq\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CTIT.2011.6107931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software testing is a process of verifying and validating that a software application or program works as per the users expectations. It is used to find out the important defects, flaws, or errors in the application code. In this paper we have developed a tool to generate different test cases automatically. To show the validity of the tool, we have considered the line equation problem and generated different test cases, and finally we conclude that Robustness Technique is better than Boundary Value Analysis, because the expected output (number of times) in case of Robustness Technique for intersecting lines, parallel lines and coincident lines are 12, 12 and 1 respectively while in case of Boundary Value Analysis it is 8, 8 and 1 respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":233698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The 2011 International Conference and Workshop on Current Trends in Information Technology (CTIT 11)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The 2011 International Conference and Workshop on Current Trends in Information Technology (CTIT 11)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CTIT.2011.6107931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 2011 International Conference and Workshop on Current Trends in Information Technology (CTIT 11)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CTIT.2011.6107931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

软件测试是一个验证和确认软件应用程序或程序按用户期望工作的过程。它用于找出应用程序代码中的重要缺陷、缺陷或错误。在本文中,我们开发了一个工具来自动生成不同的测试用例。为了证明该工具的有效性,我们考虑了直线方程问题并生成了不同的测试用例,最后我们得出结论,鲁棒性技术优于边界值分析,因为鲁棒性技术对相交线、平行线和重合线的预期输出(次数)分别为12、12和1,而对边界值分析的预期输出(次数)分别为8、8和1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of black box software testing techniques: A case study
Software testing is a process of verifying and validating that a software application or program works as per the users expectations. It is used to find out the important defects, flaws, or errors in the application code. In this paper we have developed a tool to generate different test cases automatically. To show the validity of the tool, we have considered the line equation problem and generated different test cases, and finally we conclude that Robustness Technique is better than Boundary Value Analysis, because the expected output (number of times) in case of Robustness Technique for intersecting lines, parallel lines and coincident lines are 12, 12 and 1 respectively while in case of Boundary Value Analysis it is 8, 8 and 1 respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信