以允许开放国有土地为目标,取代 PPAT 对抵押权担保授权书的责任

Dinne Diaren Dizan, I. Permadi, Hariyanto Susilo
{"title":"以允许开放国有土地为目标,取代 PPAT 对抵押权担保授权书的责任","authors":"Dinne Diaren Dizan, I. Permadi, Hariyanto Susilo","doi":"10.26905/idjch.v12i3.4966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Permit to open state land based on the Regional Regulation of the City of Balikpapan Number 1 of 2014 concerning State Land Opening Permits is not an object of Mortgage Rights, objects of mortgage rights are land rights that have the status of Property Rights, Business Use Rights, Building Use Rights and Use Rights over state land as described in Article 51 UUPA in conjunction with Article 4 of the Mortgage Rights Law. Since the State Land Opening Permit is not an object of mortgage rights, it is actually not justified if the state land is pledged as repayment of debtor's debt which is bound by an Authorisation for Assignment of Mortgage  IMTN objects as collateral are risky when the debtor is in default. Normative juridical research is a type of research used in this study while using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Research results Inclusion of IMTN objects in SKMHT is not in accordance with the applicable Prevailing Laws. SKMHT that is not in accordance with the provisions of the Mortgage Rights Law, UUPA, and the provisions of the terms of the authenticity of a deed can result in being null and void. The responsibility of the Substitute PPAT is the same as the PPAT, namely personally for the implementation of his / her job duties as well as the PPAT in accordance with Article 41 paragraph (7) of Perkaban No.1 of 2006.How to cite item: Dizan, D., Permadi, I., Susilo, H. (2021). Tanggungjawab PPAT pengganti terhadap surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan berobjek izin membuka tanah negara. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(3), 263-273. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i3.4966.","PeriodicalId":207438,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tanggungjawab PPAT pengganti terhadap surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan berobjek izin membuka tanah negara\",\"authors\":\"Dinne Diaren Dizan, I. Permadi, Hariyanto Susilo\",\"doi\":\"10.26905/idjch.v12i3.4966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Permit to open state land based on the Regional Regulation of the City of Balikpapan Number 1 of 2014 concerning State Land Opening Permits is not an object of Mortgage Rights, objects of mortgage rights are land rights that have the status of Property Rights, Business Use Rights, Building Use Rights and Use Rights over state land as described in Article 51 UUPA in conjunction with Article 4 of the Mortgage Rights Law. Since the State Land Opening Permit is not an object of mortgage rights, it is actually not justified if the state land is pledged as repayment of debtor's debt which is bound by an Authorisation for Assignment of Mortgage  IMTN objects as collateral are risky when the debtor is in default. Normative juridical research is a type of research used in this study while using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Research results Inclusion of IMTN objects in SKMHT is not in accordance with the applicable Prevailing Laws. SKMHT that is not in accordance with the provisions of the Mortgage Rights Law, UUPA, and the provisions of the terms of the authenticity of a deed can result in being null and void. The responsibility of the Substitute PPAT is the same as the PPAT, namely personally for the implementation of his / her job duties as well as the PPAT in accordance with Article 41 paragraph (7) of Perkaban No.1 of 2006.How to cite item: Dizan, D., Permadi, I., Susilo, H. (2021). Tanggungjawab PPAT pengganti terhadap surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan berobjek izin membuka tanah negara. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(3), 263-273. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i3.4966.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207438,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i3.4966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i3.4966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据2014年巴列克巴潘市关于国家土地开放许可证的第1号区域条例,开放国有土地的许可证不是抵押权的对象,抵押权的对象是UUPA第51条和《抵押权法》第4条所述的具有财产权、商业使用权、建筑使用权和国有土地使用权地位的土地权利。由于国家土地开放许可证不是抵押权利的对象,因此,如果将国家土地质押为债务人债务的偿还,实际上是不合理的,因为债务人违约时,IMTN对象作为抵押是有风险的。规范性法律研究是本研究中使用的一种研究类型,同时使用了法定方法和概念方法。在SKMHT中包含IMTN对象不符合适用的现行法律。SKMHT即不按照《抵押权法》的规定,UUPA和条款的规定对契据的真实性可造成无效。替代PPAT的责任与PPAT相同,即根据2006年第1号法令第41条第(7)款,亲自执行其工作职责以及PPAT。如何引用项目:Dizan, D., Permadi, I., Susilo, H.(2021)。Tanggungjawab PPAT pengganti terhadap surat kuasa member bankan hak tanggungan berobjek izin member buka tanah negara。中国医学杂志,12(3),263-273。doi: https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i3.4966。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tanggungjawab PPAT pengganti terhadap surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan berobjek izin membuka tanah negara
Permit to open state land based on the Regional Regulation of the City of Balikpapan Number 1 of 2014 concerning State Land Opening Permits is not an object of Mortgage Rights, objects of mortgage rights are land rights that have the status of Property Rights, Business Use Rights, Building Use Rights and Use Rights over state land as described in Article 51 UUPA in conjunction with Article 4 of the Mortgage Rights Law. Since the State Land Opening Permit is not an object of mortgage rights, it is actually not justified if the state land is pledged as repayment of debtor's debt which is bound by an Authorisation for Assignment of Mortgage  IMTN objects as collateral are risky when the debtor is in default. Normative juridical research is a type of research used in this study while using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Research results Inclusion of IMTN objects in SKMHT is not in accordance with the applicable Prevailing Laws. SKMHT that is not in accordance with the provisions of the Mortgage Rights Law, UUPA, and the provisions of the terms of the authenticity of a deed can result in being null and void. The responsibility of the Substitute PPAT is the same as the PPAT, namely personally for the implementation of his / her job duties as well as the PPAT in accordance with Article 41 paragraph (7) of Perkaban No.1 of 2006.How to cite item: Dizan, D., Permadi, I., Susilo, H. (2021). Tanggungjawab PPAT pengganti terhadap surat kuasa membebankan hak tanggungan berobjek izin membuka tanah negara. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(3), 263-273. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i3.4966.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信