体能强度测试的可靠性

L. W. McCraw, Byron N. McClenney
{"title":"体能强度测试的可靠性","authors":"L. W. McCraw, Byron N. McClenney","doi":"10.1080/10671188.1965.10614695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Three fitness tests—push-ups, sit-ups, and pull-ups—were administered on four separate days to elementary and junior high school boys to determine the relative reliabilities of using a single trial, better of two trials, and average of two trials. A trend analysis of the data revealed significant improvement during the four trials, and scores increased significantly from trial to trial on push-ups. Neither the better of two trials or the average of two trials was found to be any more reliable than a single trial.","PeriodicalId":192960,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1965-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Fitness Strength Tests\",\"authors\":\"L. W. McCraw, Byron N. McClenney\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10671188.1965.10614695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Three fitness tests—push-ups, sit-ups, and pull-ups—were administered on four separate days to elementary and junior high school boys to determine the relative reliabilities of using a single trial, better of two trials, and average of two trials. A trend analysis of the data revealed significant improvement during the four trials, and scores increased significantly from trial to trial on push-ups. Neither the better of two trials or the average of two trials was found to be any more reliable than a single trial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1965-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1965.10614695\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1965.10614695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要本研究分四天对小学男生和初中男生进行俯卧撑、仰卧起坐和引体向上三项体能测试,以确定单次试验、两次试验中较优、两次试验中平均的相对信度。对数据的趋势分析显示,在四次试验中有显著改善,俯卧撑的得分在一次又一次的试验中显著提高。两项试验中较好的结果或两项试验的平均值都没有发现比单一试验更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of Fitness Strength Tests
Abstract Three fitness tests—push-ups, sit-ups, and pull-ups—were administered on four separate days to elementary and junior high school boys to determine the relative reliabilities of using a single trial, better of two trials, and average of two trials. A trend analysis of the data revealed significant improvement during the four trials, and scores increased significantly from trial to trial on push-ups. Neither the better of two trials or the average of two trials was found to be any more reliable than a single trial.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信