可持续发展是答案——现在的问题是什么?

Rebecca M. Bratspies
{"title":"可持续发展是答案——现在的问题是什么?","authors":"Rebecca M. Bratspies","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2168255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Explanations for our inability to control the destructive impacts of human activities tend to focus a narrative of power — too many powerful actors are making too much money from business as usual and thus use their power to prevent change. Under this framing, law might be an agent for change — a way to blunt raw economic power through democratic mechanisms. And, indeed, this equalizing role of law is often celebrated as a tool for advancing sustainability. But, law’s ability to limit or shape the array of possible private choices is a double-edged sword. It just as readily limits our ability to imagine alternatives to the choices currently being made. While law and legal systems can, in theory, play the role of change agent, law can also cloak the status quo in a sense of inevitability. Most law, including environmental law, rests on an economic pre-commitment to dividing the natural world into discrete, ownable ‘resources’ available for exploitation. Law’s presumed neutrality, and its a priori nature are mustered to support this pre-commitment as though it were a universally-accepted, quasi-scientific truth about the purpose of legal systems. Yet, that characterization of our world is in fact a fraught, highly-contested value choice. By obscuring this starting point, law can be used to paint the existing array of choices as the only possible choices. Sustainability must therefore tailor itself to what already exists. The purpose of law dwindles to promoting a smoothly functioning market, rather than promoting justice or ensuring sustainability. It is then a small step to concluding that things have to be more or less the way they are. But, we can reclaim law’s transformative power. Law can aspire to much more than merely oiling the proverbial machine. Law creates the structure, the frame, within which private activity takes place, while at the same time law is shaped by those private activities. This reflexive nature means that law as an institution is uniquely situated to both shape and respond to the challenges of sustainability.","PeriodicalId":126873,"journal":{"name":"TransportRN: Transportation & Sustainability (Topic)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustainability is the Answer - Now What Was the Question?\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca M. Bratspies\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2168255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Explanations for our inability to control the destructive impacts of human activities tend to focus a narrative of power — too many powerful actors are making too much money from business as usual and thus use their power to prevent change. Under this framing, law might be an agent for change — a way to blunt raw economic power through democratic mechanisms. And, indeed, this equalizing role of law is often celebrated as a tool for advancing sustainability. But, law’s ability to limit or shape the array of possible private choices is a double-edged sword. It just as readily limits our ability to imagine alternatives to the choices currently being made. While law and legal systems can, in theory, play the role of change agent, law can also cloak the status quo in a sense of inevitability. Most law, including environmental law, rests on an economic pre-commitment to dividing the natural world into discrete, ownable ‘resources’ available for exploitation. Law’s presumed neutrality, and its a priori nature are mustered to support this pre-commitment as though it were a universally-accepted, quasi-scientific truth about the purpose of legal systems. Yet, that characterization of our world is in fact a fraught, highly-contested value choice. By obscuring this starting point, law can be used to paint the existing array of choices as the only possible choices. Sustainability must therefore tailor itself to what already exists. The purpose of law dwindles to promoting a smoothly functioning market, rather than promoting justice or ensuring sustainability. It is then a small step to concluding that things have to be more or less the way they are. But, we can reclaim law’s transformative power. Law can aspire to much more than merely oiling the proverbial machine. Law creates the structure, the frame, within which private activity takes place, while at the same time law is shaped by those private activities. This reflexive nature means that law as an institution is uniquely situated to both shape and respond to the challenges of sustainability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TransportRN: Transportation & Sustainability (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TransportRN: Transportation & Sustainability (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2168255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TransportRN: Transportation & Sustainability (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2168255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对于我们无法控制人类活动的破坏性影响的解释,往往集中在权力的叙述上——太多有权势的人像往常一样从商业中赚了太多的钱,因此利用他们的权力来阻止变革。在这种框架下,法律可能是变革的代理人——一种通过民主机制削弱原始经济力量的方式。事实上,法律的这种平衡作用经常被誉为促进可持续发展的工具。但是,法律限制或塑造一系列可能的私人选择的能力是一把双刃剑。它也很容易限制我们想象当前选择的替代方案的能力。虽然法律和法律体系在理论上可以扮演变革推动者的角色,但法律也可以在一种必然性的意义上掩盖现状。大多数法律,包括环境法,都是建立在将自然世界划分为可开采的离散的、可拥有的“资源”的经济预先承诺的基础上的。法律假定的中立性和它的先验性质都被用来支持这种预先承诺,就好像它是一种普遍接受的、关于法律体系目的的准科学真理一样。然而,这种对我们世界的描述实际上是一种令人担忧的、高度争议的价值选择。通过模糊这个起点,法律可以用来把现有的一系列选择描绘成唯一可能的选择。因此,可持续性必须适应现有的情况。法律的目的减少到促进市场平稳运作,而不是促进正义或确保可持续性。这是得出结论的一小步,即事情必须或多或少地保持现状。但是,我们可以重拾法律的变革力量。法律所能追求的远不止是给众所周知的机器上油。法律创造了私人活动发生的结构和框架,同时法律又被这些私人活动所塑造。这种反身性意味着,法律作为一种制度,在塑造和应对可持续性挑战方面具有独特的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustainability is the Answer - Now What Was the Question?
Explanations for our inability to control the destructive impacts of human activities tend to focus a narrative of power — too many powerful actors are making too much money from business as usual and thus use their power to prevent change. Under this framing, law might be an agent for change — a way to blunt raw economic power through democratic mechanisms. And, indeed, this equalizing role of law is often celebrated as a tool for advancing sustainability. But, law’s ability to limit or shape the array of possible private choices is a double-edged sword. It just as readily limits our ability to imagine alternatives to the choices currently being made. While law and legal systems can, in theory, play the role of change agent, law can also cloak the status quo in a sense of inevitability. Most law, including environmental law, rests on an economic pre-commitment to dividing the natural world into discrete, ownable ‘resources’ available for exploitation. Law’s presumed neutrality, and its a priori nature are mustered to support this pre-commitment as though it were a universally-accepted, quasi-scientific truth about the purpose of legal systems. Yet, that characterization of our world is in fact a fraught, highly-contested value choice. By obscuring this starting point, law can be used to paint the existing array of choices as the only possible choices. Sustainability must therefore tailor itself to what already exists. The purpose of law dwindles to promoting a smoothly functioning market, rather than promoting justice or ensuring sustainability. It is then a small step to concluding that things have to be more or less the way they are. But, we can reclaim law’s transformative power. Law can aspire to much more than merely oiling the proverbial machine. Law creates the structure, the frame, within which private activity takes place, while at the same time law is shaped by those private activities. This reflexive nature means that law as an institution is uniquely situated to both shape and respond to the challenges of sustainability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信