Natalia Santamaria-Macias, J. F. Orejuela-Zapata, J. Pulgarin-Giraldo, A. M. Granados-Sánchez
{"title":"基于图像信号强度和监督学习的脑MRI关键诊断","authors":"Natalia Santamaria-Macias, J. F. Orejuela-Zapata, J. Pulgarin-Giraldo, A. M. Granados-Sánchez","doi":"10.1109/ColCACI50549.2020.9247930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of this investigation is to propose a new methodology for the detection of significantly critical findings related to the brain. To validate our method, we used magnetic resonance studies of 98 patients: 33 with healthy brains and 65 with brain pathologies. The proposed methodology was evaluated with five different machine learning classification models: KNN, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree and Random Forest. The supervised classification of these models shows outstanding results: the Naive Bayes model had the best results about the accuracy, kappa, and F-score, which was 100%. Due to its high performance in critical diagnosis classifications, it would allow prioritizing reading tasks, which could lead to a better clinical outcome for the patient.","PeriodicalId":446750,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Colombian Conference on Applications of Computational Intelligence (IEEE ColCACI 2020)","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Diagnosis in Brain MRI Studies based on Image Signal Intensity and Supervised Learning\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Santamaria-Macias, J. F. Orejuela-Zapata, J. Pulgarin-Giraldo, A. M. Granados-Sánchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ColCACI50549.2020.9247930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main objective of this investigation is to propose a new methodology for the detection of significantly critical findings related to the brain. To validate our method, we used magnetic resonance studies of 98 patients: 33 with healthy brains and 65 with brain pathologies. The proposed methodology was evaluated with five different machine learning classification models: KNN, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree and Random Forest. The supervised classification of these models shows outstanding results: the Naive Bayes model had the best results about the accuracy, kappa, and F-score, which was 100%. Due to its high performance in critical diagnosis classifications, it would allow prioritizing reading tasks, which could lead to a better clinical outcome for the patient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Colombian Conference on Applications of Computational Intelligence (IEEE ColCACI 2020)\",\"volume\":\"150 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Colombian Conference on Applications of Computational Intelligence (IEEE ColCACI 2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ColCACI50549.2020.9247930\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Colombian Conference on Applications of Computational Intelligence (IEEE ColCACI 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ColCACI50549.2020.9247930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Critical Diagnosis in Brain MRI Studies based on Image Signal Intensity and Supervised Learning
The main objective of this investigation is to propose a new methodology for the detection of significantly critical findings related to the brain. To validate our method, we used magnetic resonance studies of 98 patients: 33 with healthy brains and 65 with brain pathologies. The proposed methodology was evaluated with five different machine learning classification models: KNN, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, Decision Tree and Random Forest. The supervised classification of these models shows outstanding results: the Naive Bayes model had the best results about the accuracy, kappa, and F-score, which was 100%. Due to its high performance in critical diagnosis classifications, it would allow prioritizing reading tasks, which could lead to a better clinical outcome for the patient.