瑞士法律在兴奋剂案件中的适用性

D. Mavromati
{"title":"瑞士法律在兴奋剂案件中的适用性","authors":"D. Mavromati","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2957392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) are both foundations under Swiss private law and have their registered seat is in Lausanne, Switzerland. In addition to WADA and CAS, the majority of international sports federations are equally based in Switzerland. Although the adoption of the WADC in 2003 brought about a harmonization of the different anti-doping regulations and the creation of an international regime for anti-doping rule violations, Swiss law continues to play a major role in the adjudication of doping-related procedures before the CAS. The importance of Swiss law is undoubtedly more evident when it comes to the procedural aspects, since the CAS is based in Switzerland and has to comply with the more general legal framework governing international arbitral institutions seated in Switzerland. When it comes to the law applicable to the merits, Swiss law applies “subsidiarily” in all cases where the federation whose body issued the appealed decision is seated in Switzerland. This paper aims to determine the relevance of Swiss law in both the procedure and the merits of doping-related cases, through some examples at the different stages of the anti-doping proceedings before the CAS and before the Swiss Federal Tribunal (SFT).","PeriodicalId":313622,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applicability of Swiss Law in Doping Cases\",\"authors\":\"D. Mavromati\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2957392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) are both foundations under Swiss private law and have their registered seat is in Lausanne, Switzerland. In addition to WADA and CAS, the majority of international sports federations are equally based in Switzerland. Although the adoption of the WADC in 2003 brought about a harmonization of the different anti-doping regulations and the creation of an international regime for anti-doping rule violations, Swiss law continues to play a major role in the adjudication of doping-related procedures before the CAS. The importance of Swiss law is undoubtedly more evident when it comes to the procedural aspects, since the CAS is based in Switzerland and has to comply with the more general legal framework governing international arbitral institutions seated in Switzerland. When it comes to the law applicable to the merits, Swiss law applies “subsidiarily” in all cases where the federation whose body issued the appealed decision is seated in Switzerland. This paper aims to determine the relevance of Swiss law in both the procedure and the merits of doping-related cases, through some examples at the different stages of the anti-doping proceedings before the CAS and before the Swiss Federal Tribunal (SFT).\",\"PeriodicalId\":313622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2957392\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2957392","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界反兴奋剂机构(WADA)和体育仲裁法庭(CAS)都是瑞士私法下的基金会,注册所在地都在瑞士洛桑。除了WADA和CAS,大多数国际体育联合会都设在瑞士。虽然2003年世界反兴奋剂委员会的成立统一了不同的反兴奋剂条例,并建立了一个反兴奋剂规则违反的国际制度,但瑞士法律继续在国际兴奋剂法庭的兴奋剂相关程序裁决中发挥重要作用。在程序方面,瑞士法律的重要性无疑更为明显,因为仲裁院设在瑞士,必须遵守管理设在瑞士的国际仲裁机构的更一般的法律框架。当涉及到适用于案情的法律时,瑞士法律“辅助地”适用于发布上诉决定的联邦设在瑞士的所有案件。本文旨在通过在CAS和瑞士联邦法庭(SFT)前反兴奋剂诉讼的不同阶段的一些例子,确定瑞士法律在兴奋剂相关案件的程序和优点方面的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Applicability of Swiss Law in Doping Cases
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) are both foundations under Swiss private law and have their registered seat is in Lausanne, Switzerland. In addition to WADA and CAS, the majority of international sports federations are equally based in Switzerland. Although the adoption of the WADC in 2003 brought about a harmonization of the different anti-doping regulations and the creation of an international regime for anti-doping rule violations, Swiss law continues to play a major role in the adjudication of doping-related procedures before the CAS. The importance of Swiss law is undoubtedly more evident when it comes to the procedural aspects, since the CAS is based in Switzerland and has to comply with the more general legal framework governing international arbitral institutions seated in Switzerland. When it comes to the law applicable to the merits, Swiss law applies “subsidiarily” in all cases where the federation whose body issued the appealed decision is seated in Switzerland. This paper aims to determine the relevance of Swiss law in both the procedure and the merits of doping-related cases, through some examples at the different stages of the anti-doping proceedings before the CAS and before the Swiss Federal Tribunal (SFT).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信