基于数字岩石分析的数值相对渗透率升级

Qian Sun, N. Zhang, Nayef Alyafei, Yuhe Wang, M. Fadlelmula
{"title":"基于数字岩石分析的数值相对渗透率升级","authors":"Qian Sun, N. Zhang, Nayef Alyafei, Yuhe Wang, M. Fadlelmula","doi":"10.2118/196687-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reservoir simulation is commonly performed on upscaled models of complex geological models. The upscaling process introduces a principal challenge in accurately simulating two-phase fluid dynamics in porous media. To tackle this challenge, it is important to upscale relative permeability accurately. In this paper, a numerical method, which is based on the mimetic finite difference method (MFD) and digital rock analysis (DRA), is proposed for relative permeability upscaling. The validation of MFD is tested by two different cases with exact pressure solution. Then, the relative permeability of the digital rock (small element) is calculated based on the pore network modeling. The small elements are combined together to make up a larger model with different sizes (4×4×4, 6×6×6, 8×8×8, 10×10×10 elements). Finally, the accuracy of the proposed method is verified by comparing simulated results of the different sizes with that of the original one. The results show that MFD can solve the multi-phase flow scenarios with high accuracy and the L2 error follows the opposite trend to that of mesh size, which means that more refinement level gives less L2 error. For the upscaling of absolute permeability, the relative error can be decreased to 2.27%, which confirms that the proposed method is capable of calculating the absolute permeability with higher refinement levels. The fitting degree of the simulated water phase relative permeability to the original one is better than that of oil phase. The average relative error of water pahse relative permeability upscaling can decrease to less than 5.0%. It is found that the results will get worse when the model includes less elements. Especially at low water saturation, there exists some fluctuations for relative permeability curves and it may be due to the unstable state of the waterflood front with less elements involved.","PeriodicalId":318637,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Tue, September 17, 2019","volume":"249 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Relative Permeability Upscaling Based on Digital Rock Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Qian Sun, N. Zhang, Nayef Alyafei, Yuhe Wang, M. Fadlelmula\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/196687-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Reservoir simulation is commonly performed on upscaled models of complex geological models. The upscaling process introduces a principal challenge in accurately simulating two-phase fluid dynamics in porous media. To tackle this challenge, it is important to upscale relative permeability accurately. In this paper, a numerical method, which is based on the mimetic finite difference method (MFD) and digital rock analysis (DRA), is proposed for relative permeability upscaling. The validation of MFD is tested by two different cases with exact pressure solution. Then, the relative permeability of the digital rock (small element) is calculated based on the pore network modeling. The small elements are combined together to make up a larger model with different sizes (4×4×4, 6×6×6, 8×8×8, 10×10×10 elements). Finally, the accuracy of the proposed method is verified by comparing simulated results of the different sizes with that of the original one. The results show that MFD can solve the multi-phase flow scenarios with high accuracy and the L2 error follows the opposite trend to that of mesh size, which means that more refinement level gives less L2 error. For the upscaling of absolute permeability, the relative error can be decreased to 2.27%, which confirms that the proposed method is capable of calculating the absolute permeability with higher refinement levels. The fitting degree of the simulated water phase relative permeability to the original one is better than that of oil phase. The average relative error of water pahse relative permeability upscaling can decrease to less than 5.0%. It is found that the results will get worse when the model includes less elements. Especially at low water saturation, there exists some fluctuations for relative permeability curves and it may be due to the unstable state of the waterflood front with less elements involved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Tue, September 17, 2019\",\"volume\":\"249 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Tue, September 17, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/196687-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Tue, September 17, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196687-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

油藏模拟通常是在复杂地质模型的放大模型上进行的。放大过程为精确模拟多孔介质中的两相流体动力学带来了主要挑战。为了应对这一挑战,准确提高相对渗透率非常重要。本文提出了一种基于模拟有限差分法(MFD)和数字岩石分析(DRA)的相对渗透率提升数值方法。通过两种不同的精确压力解实例验证了MFD的有效性。然后,基于孔隙网络模型计算数字岩石(小单元)的相对渗透率;这些小元素被组合在一起,组成一个大小不同的大模型(4×4×4、6×6×6、8×8×8、10×10×10元素)。最后,将不同尺寸的仿真结果与原仿真结果进行对比,验证了所提方法的准确性。结果表明,MFD能够以较高的精度求解多相流场景,并且L2误差与网格尺寸的变化趋势相反,即细化级别越高,L2误差越小。对于绝对渗透率的上尺度计算,相对误差可降至2.27%,验证了该方法具有更高精细化水平的绝对渗透率计算能力。模拟的水相相对渗透率与原始渗透率拟合程度优于油相。水相相对渗透率放大的平均相对误差可以减小到5.0%以下。结果表明,模型中元素越少,计算结果越差。特别是在低含水饱和度时,相对渗透率曲线存在一定的波动,这可能是由于水驱前缘的不稳定状态所导致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical Relative Permeability Upscaling Based on Digital Rock Analysis
Reservoir simulation is commonly performed on upscaled models of complex geological models. The upscaling process introduces a principal challenge in accurately simulating two-phase fluid dynamics in porous media. To tackle this challenge, it is important to upscale relative permeability accurately. In this paper, a numerical method, which is based on the mimetic finite difference method (MFD) and digital rock analysis (DRA), is proposed for relative permeability upscaling. The validation of MFD is tested by two different cases with exact pressure solution. Then, the relative permeability of the digital rock (small element) is calculated based on the pore network modeling. The small elements are combined together to make up a larger model with different sizes (4×4×4, 6×6×6, 8×8×8, 10×10×10 elements). Finally, the accuracy of the proposed method is verified by comparing simulated results of the different sizes with that of the original one. The results show that MFD can solve the multi-phase flow scenarios with high accuracy and the L2 error follows the opposite trend to that of mesh size, which means that more refinement level gives less L2 error. For the upscaling of absolute permeability, the relative error can be decreased to 2.27%, which confirms that the proposed method is capable of calculating the absolute permeability with higher refinement levels. The fitting degree of the simulated water phase relative permeability to the original one is better than that of oil phase. The average relative error of water pahse relative permeability upscaling can decrease to less than 5.0%. It is found that the results will get worse when the model includes less elements. Especially at low water saturation, there exists some fluctuations for relative permeability curves and it may be due to the unstable state of the waterflood front with less elements involved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信