混合格式测试双因子模型下的多维IRT量表链接

S. Kim
{"title":"混合格式测试双因子模型下的多维IRT量表链接","authors":"S. Kim","doi":"10.31158/jeev.2022.35.3.521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Like unidimensional item response theory (IRT) models, bifactor models in multidimensional IRT have a scale indeterminacy problem, and due to this problem scale linking methods are needed to place all bifactor model parameter estimates from separate calibrations on a common ability scale. Four bifactor scale linking methods including the direct least squares (DLS), mean/least squares (MLS), item category response function (ICRF), and test response function (TRF) methods have been presented for use with single-format tests. Parallel to the 2006 paper of Kim and Lee, this paper extends the four scale linking methods to a mixture of bifactor models for mixed-format tests. Each linking method extended is intended to handle mixed-format tests using any mixture of the following bifactor extensions of four unidimensional IRT models: the bifactor three-parameter logistic, bifactor graded response, bifactor generalized partial credit, and bifactor nominal response models. For generality, symmetric criterion functions are proposed for the ICRF and TRF methods. Given two sets of parameter estimates for the common items linking two test forms, each linking method estimates the dilation (slope) and translation (intercept) coefficients of a linear transformation. Simulations are conducted to investigate the performance of the four linking methods. The results indicate that overall, the ICRF method performs very well, the MLS and DLS methods perform well (the MLS method is slightly better than the DLS method), and the TRF method performs poorly in estimating the linking coefficients. The inferiority of the TRF method is mainly due to its poor estimation of the translation coefficients.","PeriodicalId":207460,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society for Educational Evaluation","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidimensional IRT Scale Linking Under a Mixture of Bifactor Models for Mixed-Format Tests\",\"authors\":\"S. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.31158/jeev.2022.35.3.521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Like unidimensional item response theory (IRT) models, bifactor models in multidimensional IRT have a scale indeterminacy problem, and due to this problem scale linking methods are needed to place all bifactor model parameter estimates from separate calibrations on a common ability scale. Four bifactor scale linking methods including the direct least squares (DLS), mean/least squares (MLS), item category response function (ICRF), and test response function (TRF) methods have been presented for use with single-format tests. Parallel to the 2006 paper of Kim and Lee, this paper extends the four scale linking methods to a mixture of bifactor models for mixed-format tests. Each linking method extended is intended to handle mixed-format tests using any mixture of the following bifactor extensions of four unidimensional IRT models: the bifactor three-parameter logistic, bifactor graded response, bifactor generalized partial credit, and bifactor nominal response models. For generality, symmetric criterion functions are proposed for the ICRF and TRF methods. Given two sets of parameter estimates for the common items linking two test forms, each linking method estimates the dilation (slope) and translation (intercept) coefficients of a linear transformation. Simulations are conducted to investigate the performance of the four linking methods. The results indicate that overall, the ICRF method performs very well, the MLS and DLS methods perform well (the MLS method is slightly better than the DLS method), and the TRF method performs poorly in estimating the linking coefficients. The inferiority of the TRF method is mainly due to its poor estimation of the translation coefficients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":207460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Society for Educational Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Society for Educational Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31158/jeev.2022.35.3.521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society for Educational Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31158/jeev.2022.35.3.521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与一维项目反应理论(IRT)模型一样,多维项目反应理论中的双因子模型也存在量表不确定性问题,因此需要采用量表连接方法将来自不同校准的所有双因子模型参数估计放在一个共同的能力量表上。四种双因素量表连接方法,包括直接最小二乘(DLS)、平均/最小二乘(MLS)、项目类别反应函数(ICRF)和测试反应函数(TRF)方法,已被提出用于单一格式的测试。与Kim和Lee 2006年的论文类似,本文将四种量表连接方法扩展到混合格式测试的双因素模型。每个扩展的链接方法都是为了处理混合格式的测试,使用以下四个单维IRT模型的双因素扩展的任何混合物:双因素三参数逻辑,双因素分级响应,双因素广义部分信用和双因素名义响应模型。为了通用性,提出了ICRF和TRF方法的对称准则函数。给定连接两种测试形式的共同项目的两组参数估计,每种连接方法估计线性变换的膨胀(斜率)和平移(截距)系数。通过仿真研究了四种连接方法的性能。结果表明,总体而言,ICRF方法表现良好,MLS方法和DLS方法表现良好(MLS方法略优于DLS方法),而TRF方法在估计连接系数方面表现较差。TRF方法的缺点主要在于对平移系数的估计较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multidimensional IRT Scale Linking Under a Mixture of Bifactor Models for Mixed-Format Tests
Like unidimensional item response theory (IRT) models, bifactor models in multidimensional IRT have a scale indeterminacy problem, and due to this problem scale linking methods are needed to place all bifactor model parameter estimates from separate calibrations on a common ability scale. Four bifactor scale linking methods including the direct least squares (DLS), mean/least squares (MLS), item category response function (ICRF), and test response function (TRF) methods have been presented for use with single-format tests. Parallel to the 2006 paper of Kim and Lee, this paper extends the four scale linking methods to a mixture of bifactor models for mixed-format tests. Each linking method extended is intended to handle mixed-format tests using any mixture of the following bifactor extensions of four unidimensional IRT models: the bifactor three-parameter logistic, bifactor graded response, bifactor generalized partial credit, and bifactor nominal response models. For generality, symmetric criterion functions are proposed for the ICRF and TRF methods. Given two sets of parameter estimates for the common items linking two test forms, each linking method estimates the dilation (slope) and translation (intercept) coefficients of a linear transformation. Simulations are conducted to investigate the performance of the four linking methods. The results indicate that overall, the ICRF method performs very well, the MLS and DLS methods perform well (the MLS method is slightly better than the DLS method), and the TRF method performs poorly in estimating the linking coefficients. The inferiority of the TRF method is mainly due to its poor estimation of the translation coefficients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信