TUPÃ风险评估软件与SIRAC软件在阿根廷某文物建筑中的应用比较

Julieta Z. Vernieri, Héctor L. Soibelzon
{"title":"TUPÃ风险评估软件与SIRAC软件在阿根廷某文物建筑中的应用比较","authors":"Julieta Z. Vernieri, Héctor L. Soibelzon","doi":"10.1109/SIPDA.2011.6088448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses virtues and limitations of a new risk assessment software tool called TUPÃ developed by the IEE-USP (Institute of Electrotechnics and Energy — University of São Paulo) in Brazil, compared to the widely distributed Software Risk Assessment Calculator (SIRAC), developed by IEC. Besides, it checks its accordance with the risk evaluation methodology proposed by the IEC 62305-2 ed1.0 standard, through manual calculations applied to the selected example. An analysis of the data entry interface of the TUPÃ software tool, including accessibility, limitations and different alternatives for the parameter values is developed in comparison with the SIRAC tool. Aiming to compare the performance of both software, the document includes a risk assessment calculation against lightning for a building belonging to our University in La Plata, Argentina. In order to limit the extension of the paper, just some of the risk components are considered. Final results are compared, as well as partial results, when available. As simplified tools, the overall advantages and limitations of both software were fairly balanced. For instance, the SIRAC software allows for more than one service, while TUPÃ only considers one at a time. On the other hand, TUPÃ allows for the influence of an adjacent structure, which SIRAC ignores. Meanwhile, an interesting contribution of the TUPÃ software includes the possibility to introduce a manual calculation of the collection area in the case of more complicated structures.","PeriodicalId":277573,"journal":{"name":"2011 International Symposium on Lightning Protection","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of TUPÃ risk assessment software with SIRAC software applied to a heritage building in Argentina\",\"authors\":\"Julieta Z. Vernieri, Héctor L. Soibelzon\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIPDA.2011.6088448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper analyses virtues and limitations of a new risk assessment software tool called TUPÃ developed by the IEE-USP (Institute of Electrotechnics and Energy — University of São Paulo) in Brazil, compared to the widely distributed Software Risk Assessment Calculator (SIRAC), developed by IEC. Besides, it checks its accordance with the risk evaluation methodology proposed by the IEC 62305-2 ed1.0 standard, through manual calculations applied to the selected example. An analysis of the data entry interface of the TUPÃ software tool, including accessibility, limitations and different alternatives for the parameter values is developed in comparison with the SIRAC tool. Aiming to compare the performance of both software, the document includes a risk assessment calculation against lightning for a building belonging to our University in La Plata, Argentina. In order to limit the extension of the paper, just some of the risk components are considered. Final results are compared, as well as partial results, when available. As simplified tools, the overall advantages and limitations of both software were fairly balanced. For instance, the SIRAC software allows for more than one service, while TUPÃ only considers one at a time. On the other hand, TUPÃ allows for the influence of an adjacent structure, which SIRAC ignores. Meanwhile, an interesting contribution of the TUPÃ software includes the possibility to introduce a manual calculation of the collection area in the case of more complicated structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 International Symposium on Lightning Protection\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 International Symposium on Lightning Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIPDA.2011.6088448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 International Symposium on Lightning Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIPDA.2011.6088448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文分析了巴西圣保罗大学电工技术与能源研究所(IEE-USP)开发的新型风险评估软件TUPÃ的优点和局限性,并与IEC开发的广泛使用的软件风险评估计算器(SIRAC)进行了比较。并对所选实例进行人工计算,验证其是否符合IEC 62305-2 ed1.0标准提出的风险评价方法。分析了TUPÃ软件工具的数据输入接口,包括可访问性、限制和参数值的不同选择,并与SIRAC工具进行了比较。为了比较这两种软件的性能,该文件包括对我们大学位于阿根廷拉普拉塔的一栋建筑的雷电风险评估计算。为了限制论文的延伸,只考虑了一些风险成分。最终结果和部分结果在可用时进行比较。作为简化的工具,这两种软件的总体优势和局限性是相当平衡的。例如,SIRAC软件允许多个服务,而TUPÃ一次只考虑一个服务。另一方面,TUPÃ考虑到相邻结构的影响,SIRAC忽略了这一点。同时,TUPÃ软件的一个有趣的贡献包括在更复杂的结构情况下引入人工计算收集区域的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of TUPÃ risk assessment software with SIRAC software applied to a heritage building in Argentina
This paper analyses virtues and limitations of a new risk assessment software tool called TUPÃ developed by the IEE-USP (Institute of Electrotechnics and Energy — University of São Paulo) in Brazil, compared to the widely distributed Software Risk Assessment Calculator (SIRAC), developed by IEC. Besides, it checks its accordance with the risk evaluation methodology proposed by the IEC 62305-2 ed1.0 standard, through manual calculations applied to the selected example. An analysis of the data entry interface of the TUPÃ software tool, including accessibility, limitations and different alternatives for the parameter values is developed in comparison with the SIRAC tool. Aiming to compare the performance of both software, the document includes a risk assessment calculation against lightning for a building belonging to our University in La Plata, Argentina. In order to limit the extension of the paper, just some of the risk components are considered. Final results are compared, as well as partial results, when available. As simplified tools, the overall advantages and limitations of both software were fairly balanced. For instance, the SIRAC software allows for more than one service, while TUPÃ only considers one at a time. On the other hand, TUPÃ allows for the influence of an adjacent structure, which SIRAC ignores. Meanwhile, an interesting contribution of the TUPÃ software includes the possibility to introduce a manual calculation of the collection area in the case of more complicated structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信