两个人在一个诡计袋:白人,黑人和叔本华伦理的操作在科马克·麦卡锡的日落有限公司

Russell M. Hillier
{"title":"两个人在一个诡计袋:白人,黑人和叔本华伦理的操作在科马克·麦卡锡的日落有限公司","authors":"Russell M. Hillier","doi":"10.5325/CORMMCCAJ.16.2.0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The operation of Schopenhauerian ethics is perhaps nowhere more painstakingly expounded in McCarthy's oeuvre than in The Sunset Limited. When set within Schopenhauer's ethical system, the respective positions of Black and White readily yield to evaluation. On the one hand, White, who appears to be a classic embodiment of Schopenhauer's pessimism, is lacking according to Schopenhauer's standard of ethical excellence. White's egoistic standpoint on the world is devoid of substance and credibility and his disdain for and willful isolation from others betrays an unhealthy, narcissistic, and other-denying egoism. On the other hand, Black's ethical conduct not only satisfies the criteria of Schopenhauer's virtuous man, his way of life is also depicted as making significant progress on the path toward Schopenhauerian sainthood. Once an egoist himself and now a devoted altruist, Black has awoken from his \"beggar's dream\" to recognize a human fellowship of pain, the presence of his \"innermost self \"in all others, and the need to obey a moral imperative to be compassionate. Considered against the backdrop of Schopenhauer's ethical framework, The Sunset Limited plays out a fierce opposition between the troubled egoism of White, \"a professor of darkness,\" and the saintly altruism of Black, \"an emissary of Jesus.\"","PeriodicalId":126318,"journal":{"name":"The Cormac McCarthy Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Men in a Trickbag: White, Black, and the Operation of Schopenhauerian Ethics in Cormac McCarthy's The Sunset Limited\",\"authors\":\"Russell M. Hillier\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/CORMMCCAJ.16.2.0104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:The operation of Schopenhauerian ethics is perhaps nowhere more painstakingly expounded in McCarthy's oeuvre than in The Sunset Limited. When set within Schopenhauer's ethical system, the respective positions of Black and White readily yield to evaluation. On the one hand, White, who appears to be a classic embodiment of Schopenhauer's pessimism, is lacking according to Schopenhauer's standard of ethical excellence. White's egoistic standpoint on the world is devoid of substance and credibility and his disdain for and willful isolation from others betrays an unhealthy, narcissistic, and other-denying egoism. On the other hand, Black's ethical conduct not only satisfies the criteria of Schopenhauer's virtuous man, his way of life is also depicted as making significant progress on the path toward Schopenhauerian sainthood. Once an egoist himself and now a devoted altruist, Black has awoken from his \\\"beggar's dream\\\" to recognize a human fellowship of pain, the presence of his \\\"innermost self \\\"in all others, and the need to obey a moral imperative to be compassionate. Considered against the backdrop of Schopenhauer's ethical framework, The Sunset Limited plays out a fierce opposition between the troubled egoism of White, \\\"a professor of darkness,\\\" and the saintly altruism of Black, \\\"an emissary of Jesus.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":126318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cormac McCarthy Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cormac McCarthy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/CORMMCCAJ.16.2.0104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cormac McCarthy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/CORMMCCAJ.16.2.0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在麦卡锡的全部作品中,叔本华伦理学的运作可能没有比《日落有限》更详尽地阐述了。当被置于叔本华的伦理体系中时,黑与白各自的立场很容易屈服于评价。一方面,怀特是叔本华悲观主义的典型化身,但却缺乏叔本华的道德卓越标准。怀特对世界的利己主义立场缺乏实质和可信度,他对他人的蔑视和故意孤立暴露了一种不健康的、自恋的、否认他人的利己主义。另一方面,布莱克的道德行为不仅满足叔本华的道德人的标准,他的生活方式也被描述为在叔本华的圣人之路上取得了重大进展。布莱克曾经是一个利己主义者,现在是一个忠诚的利他主义者,他从“乞丐的梦”中醒来,认识到人类与痛苦的关系,认识到他“最内在的自我”存在于所有其他人身上,认识到有必要遵守道德上的要求,以表现出同情心。在叔本华的伦理框架的背景下,《日落有限》在“黑暗教授”怀特的麻烦利己主义和“耶稣使者”布莱克的圣洁利他主义之间展开了激烈的对立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two Men in a Trickbag: White, Black, and the Operation of Schopenhauerian Ethics in Cormac McCarthy's The Sunset Limited
abstract:The operation of Schopenhauerian ethics is perhaps nowhere more painstakingly expounded in McCarthy's oeuvre than in The Sunset Limited. When set within Schopenhauer's ethical system, the respective positions of Black and White readily yield to evaluation. On the one hand, White, who appears to be a classic embodiment of Schopenhauer's pessimism, is lacking according to Schopenhauer's standard of ethical excellence. White's egoistic standpoint on the world is devoid of substance and credibility and his disdain for and willful isolation from others betrays an unhealthy, narcissistic, and other-denying egoism. On the other hand, Black's ethical conduct not only satisfies the criteria of Schopenhauer's virtuous man, his way of life is also depicted as making significant progress on the path toward Schopenhauerian sainthood. Once an egoist himself and now a devoted altruist, Black has awoken from his "beggar's dream" to recognize a human fellowship of pain, the presence of his "innermost self "in all others, and the need to obey a moral imperative to be compassionate. Considered against the backdrop of Schopenhauer's ethical framework, The Sunset Limited plays out a fierce opposition between the troubled egoism of White, "a professor of darkness," and the saintly altruism of Black, "an emissary of Jesus."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信