大学生网络成瘾四种量表的评估

Zhang Xueqing, Zhang Kexin, Zhu Yunjiao, Wei Hongyuan, Wang Tianli, Lian Xiaoyan, Zhang Jianghui, Z. Zhihua
{"title":"大学生网络成瘾四种量表的评估","authors":"Zhang Xueqing, Zhang Kexin, Zhu Yunjiao, Wei Hongyuan, Wang Tianli, Lian Xiaoyan, Zhang Jianghui, Z. Zhihua","doi":"10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2021.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To compare the reliability of Internet Addiction Impairment Index (IAII), Revised\n Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS-R)-Taiwan Revision, CIAS-R-Mainland Revision,\n Young Diagnostic Questionnaire (YDQ) and the consistency of Internet addiction using\n the four scales in college students.\n Methods A total of 1 004 undergraduates from 3 universities in Hefei were selected to measure\n the tendency of internet addiction simultaneously using the four scales, and 122 students\n were retested two weeks after the initial assessment. Correlation coefficient, coincidence\n rate and Kappa value were used to analyze the consistency of the four scales. Analysis of variance,\n t test and Logistic regression were used to determine the consistency of the factors\n related to internet addiction scale.\n Results The reliability of the four Internet addiction scales were greater than 0.7 (\n P<0.01). The correlation coefficient among all scales was greater than 0.5 (\n P<0.01). The agreement between YDQ and CIAS-R-Mainland Revision was 0.87. The Kappa value of YDQ and CIAS-R-Taiwan Revision in the consistency analysis was 0.51 (\n P<0.01), the Kappa value between the other scales was less than 0.5. Results showed that the four scales\n were consistent in Internet addiction prevalence by gender, grade and major, while\n CIAS-R-Taiwan Revision and YDQ were not consistent with the other two scales in sleep\n disorder.\n Conclusion The four Internet addiction scales all have good reliability, while low agreement\n in Internet addiction assessment, suggesting further improvement and revision in Internet\n addiction scales.\n 【摘要】 目的 比较网络成瘾损害量表(IAII)、中文网络成瘾量表(CIAS-R)-中国台湾修订版、CIAS-R-中国大陆修订版、自评 Young 网络成瘾诊断问卷(YDQ)的信度及在大学生网络成瘾测量中的一致性,\n 为今后网络成瘾调查量表的选择和修订提供参考依据。\n 方法 分层整群选取合肥市 3 所高校的 1 004 名本科生, 采用 4 个量表同时进行网络成瘾倾向的测量, 对 122 名大学生在首次测评 2 周后进行重测。采用相关系数、符合率、即\n Kappa 值分析 4 个量表的一致性, 采用 t 检验、方差分析和 Logistic 回归进行网络成瘾量表相关因素分析的一致性判断。\n 结果 4个网络成瘾量表的信度均>0.7(\n P<0.01)。各量表间的相关系数均大于 0.5(\n P<0.01)。YDQ 与 CIAS-R-中国大陆修订版符合率为 0.87,一致性分析结果中 YDQ与 CIAS-R-中国台湾修订版的 Kappa 值为 0.51(\n P<0.01), 其他量表两两之间的\n Kappa值均< 0.5。网络成瘾的相关因素分析显示, 4种量表在性别、年级、专业性质因素上的差异具有一致性, CIAS-R-中国台湾修订版与 YDQ 在睡眠障碍因素上的统计学差异与其他量表不一致。\n 结论 4 种网络成瘾量表均具有较好的信度, 但是各量表在网络成瘾判定上的一致性相对较低。建议对网络成瘾量表做进一步的完善和修订。","PeriodicalId":106801,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of School Health","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of four Internet addiction scales in college students\",\"authors\":\"Zhang Xueqing, Zhang Kexin, Zhu Yunjiao, Wei Hongyuan, Wang Tianli, Lian Xiaoyan, Zhang Jianghui, Z. Zhihua\",\"doi\":\"10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2021.08.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To compare the reliability of Internet Addiction Impairment Index (IAII), Revised\\n Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS-R)-Taiwan Revision, CIAS-R-Mainland Revision,\\n Young Diagnostic Questionnaire (YDQ) and the consistency of Internet addiction using\\n the four scales in college students.\\n Methods A total of 1 004 undergraduates from 3 universities in Hefei were selected to measure\\n the tendency of internet addiction simultaneously using the four scales, and 122 students\\n were retested two weeks after the initial assessment. Correlation coefficient, coincidence\\n rate and Kappa value were used to analyze the consistency of the four scales. Analysis of variance,\\n t test and Logistic regression were used to determine the consistency of the factors\\n related to internet addiction scale.\\n Results The reliability of the four Internet addiction scales were greater than 0.7 (\\n P<0.01). The correlation coefficient among all scales was greater than 0.5 (\\n P<0.01). The agreement between YDQ and CIAS-R-Mainland Revision was 0.87. The Kappa value of YDQ and CIAS-R-Taiwan Revision in the consistency analysis was 0.51 (\\n P<0.01), the Kappa value between the other scales was less than 0.5. Results showed that the four scales\\n were consistent in Internet addiction prevalence by gender, grade and major, while\\n CIAS-R-Taiwan Revision and YDQ were not consistent with the other two scales in sleep\\n disorder.\\n Conclusion The four Internet addiction scales all have good reliability, while low agreement\\n in Internet addiction assessment, suggesting further improvement and revision in Internet\\n addiction scales.\\n 【摘要】 目的 比较网络成瘾损害量表(IAII)、中文网络成瘾量表(CIAS-R)-中国台湾修订版、CIAS-R-中国大陆修订版、自评 Young 网络成瘾诊断问卷(YDQ)的信度及在大学生网络成瘾测量中的一致性,\\n 为今后网络成瘾调查量表的选择和修订提供参考依据。\\n 方法 分层整群选取合肥市 3 所高校的 1 004 名本科生, 采用 4 个量表同时进行网络成瘾倾向的测量, 对 122 名大学生在首次测评 2 周后进行重测。采用相关系数、符合率、即\\n Kappa 值分析 4 个量表的一致性, 采用 t 检验、方差分析和 Logistic 回归进行网络成瘾量表相关因素分析的一致性判断。\\n 结果 4个网络成瘾量表的信度均>0.7(\\n P<0.01)。各量表间的相关系数均大于 0.5(\\n P<0.01)。YDQ 与 CIAS-R-中国大陆修订版符合率为 0.87,一致性分析结果中 YDQ与 CIAS-R-中国台湾修订版的 Kappa 值为 0.51(\\n P<0.01), 其他量表两两之间的\\n Kappa值均< 0.5。网络成瘾的相关因素分析显示, 4种量表在性别、年级、专业性质因素上的差异具有一致性, CIAS-R-中国台湾修订版与 YDQ 在睡眠障碍因素上的统计学差异与其他量表不一致。\\n 结论 4 种网络成瘾量表均具有较好的信度, 但是各量表在网络成瘾判定上的一致性相对较低。建议对网络成瘾量表做进一步的完善和修订。\",\"PeriodicalId\":106801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of School Health\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of School Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2021.08.017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16835/J.CNKI.1000-9817.2021.08.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的比较网络成瘾损害指数(IAII)、修订陈氏网络成瘾量表(CIAS-R)-台湾修订版、修订陈氏网络成瘾量表(CIAS-R -大陆修订版)、青少年诊断问卷(YDQ)的信度及四种量表对大学生网络成瘾的一致性。方法选取合肥市3所高校的1 004名大学生,采用四种量表同时测量网络成瘾倾向,122名学生在初测后2周进行复测。采用相关系数、符合率和Kappa值分析四个量表的一致性。采用方差分析、t检验和Logistic回归来确定网络成瘾量表相关因素的一致性。结果4份网络成瘾量表的信度均大于0.7(P<0.01)。0.5(p <0.01)。YDQ与CIAS-R——中国大陆修订版符合率为0.87,一致性分析结果中YDQ与CIAS-R——中国台湾修订版的Kappa值为0.51 (P < 0.01),其他量表两两之间的Kappa值均< 0.5。网络成瘾的相关因素分析显示,4种量表在性别,年级,专业性质因素上的差异具有一致性,CIAS-R——中国台湾修订版与YDQ在睡眠障碍因素上的统计学差异与其他量表不一致。结论 4 种网络成瘾量表均具有较好的信度, 但是各量表在网络成瘾判定上的一致性相对较低。建议对网络成瘾量表做进一步的完善和修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of four Internet addiction scales in college students
Objective To compare the reliability of Internet Addiction Impairment Index (IAII), Revised Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS-R)-Taiwan Revision, CIAS-R-Mainland Revision, Young Diagnostic Questionnaire (YDQ) and the consistency of Internet addiction using the four scales in college students. Methods A total of 1 004 undergraduates from 3 universities in Hefei were selected to measure the tendency of internet addiction simultaneously using the four scales, and 122 students were retested two weeks after the initial assessment. Correlation coefficient, coincidence rate and Kappa value were used to analyze the consistency of the four scales. Analysis of variance, t test and Logistic regression were used to determine the consistency of the factors related to internet addiction scale. Results The reliability of the four Internet addiction scales were greater than 0.7 ( P<0.01). The correlation coefficient among all scales was greater than 0.5 ( P<0.01). The agreement between YDQ and CIAS-R-Mainland Revision was 0.87. The Kappa value of YDQ and CIAS-R-Taiwan Revision in the consistency analysis was 0.51 ( P<0.01), the Kappa value between the other scales was less than 0.5. Results showed that the four scales were consistent in Internet addiction prevalence by gender, grade and major, while CIAS-R-Taiwan Revision and YDQ were not consistent with the other two scales in sleep disorder. Conclusion The four Internet addiction scales all have good reliability, while low agreement in Internet addiction assessment, suggesting further improvement and revision in Internet addiction scales. 【摘要】 目的 比较网络成瘾损害量表(IAII)、中文网络成瘾量表(CIAS-R)-中国台湾修订版、CIAS-R-中国大陆修订版、自评 Young 网络成瘾诊断问卷(YDQ)的信度及在大学生网络成瘾测量中的一致性, 为今后网络成瘾调查量表的选择和修订提供参考依据。 方法 分层整群选取合肥市 3 所高校的 1 004 名本科生, 采用 4 个量表同时进行网络成瘾倾向的测量, 对 122 名大学生在首次测评 2 周后进行重测。采用相关系数、符合率、即 Kappa 值分析 4 个量表的一致性, 采用 t 检验、方差分析和 Logistic 回归进行网络成瘾量表相关因素分析的一致性判断。 结果 4个网络成瘾量表的信度均>0.7( P<0.01)。各量表间的相关系数均大于 0.5( P<0.01)。YDQ 与 CIAS-R-中国大陆修订版符合率为 0.87,一致性分析结果中 YDQ与 CIAS-R-中国台湾修订版的 Kappa 值为 0.51( P<0.01), 其他量表两两之间的 Kappa值均< 0.5。网络成瘾的相关因素分析显示, 4种量表在性别、年级、专业性质因素上的差异具有一致性, CIAS-R-中国台湾修订版与 YDQ 在睡眠障碍因素上的统计学差异与其他量表不一致。 结论 4 种网络成瘾量表均具有较好的信度, 但是各量表在网络成瘾判定上的一致性相对较低。建议对网络成瘾量表做进一步的完善和修订。
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信