肱三头肌促进技术对健康人群到达点时肩胛骨肌激活的影响。

O. Lennon, K. Logeswaran, Srushti Mistry, Tara Moore, G. Severini, C. Cornall, C. O’Sullivan, Ulrik McCarthy Persson
{"title":"肱三头肌促进技术对健康人群到达点时肩胛骨肌激活的影响。","authors":"O. Lennon, K. Logeswaran, Srushti Mistry, Tara Moore, G. Severini, C. Cornall, C. O’Sullivan, Ulrik McCarthy Persson","doi":"10.3138/PTC-2018-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Neurodevelopmental techniques are commonly used in upper limb rehabilitation, but little evidence supports the facilitation techniques associated with this concept. This exploratory study determined whether a facilitation technique at the triceps muscle affected scapulothoracic muscle activity during reach in healthy participants compared with self-selected posture and reach. The secondary aim was to determine whether muscle activation levels differed between the facilitation technique and the optimized posture or guided movement. We also hypothesized that activity in the scapular stabilizers (lower trapezius [LT] and serratus anterior [SA]) would be increased during the facilitated movement than in the other conditions. Methods: The study included 17 healthy participants (aged 20-70 y). Surface electromyography recorded muscle activity in the upper trapezius (UT), middle trapezius (MT), and LT muscles and in the SA, middle deltoid (MD), and triceps during five performance conditions. We used Friedman's test to explore differences in muscle activity across conditions and Bonferroni's post hoc test to explore the differences between conditions. Results: The facilitation technique produced decreased activity in the SA, MD, and triceps muscles (p < 0.01) compared with the self-executed control condition. Compared with optimized posture with independent reach, facilitated movement again produced similar reductions in MD and triceps activity, with decreased LT activity also noted (p < 0.01). Lower activity levels were noted during facilitation than during manual guidance, with or without optimized posture, in the UT, MT, (p < 0.01), SA, and MD muscles (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Triceps facilitation did not increase scapular stability activity, but the activity levels in several other muscle groups (SA, MD, and triceps) were reduced during triceps facilitation compared with optimized posture or guided movement. Detailed analysis of this technique, including co-registered kinematic data and timing of muscle onset, is needed.","PeriodicalId":390485,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the Triceps Brachii Facilitation Technique on Scapulohumeral Muscle Activation during Reach and Point in a Healthy Population.\",\"authors\":\"O. Lennon, K. Logeswaran, Srushti Mistry, Tara Moore, G. Severini, C. Cornall, C. O’Sullivan, Ulrik McCarthy Persson\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/PTC-2018-0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Neurodevelopmental techniques are commonly used in upper limb rehabilitation, but little evidence supports the facilitation techniques associated with this concept. This exploratory study determined whether a facilitation technique at the triceps muscle affected scapulothoracic muscle activity during reach in healthy participants compared with self-selected posture and reach. The secondary aim was to determine whether muscle activation levels differed between the facilitation technique and the optimized posture or guided movement. We also hypothesized that activity in the scapular stabilizers (lower trapezius [LT] and serratus anterior [SA]) would be increased during the facilitated movement than in the other conditions. Methods: The study included 17 healthy participants (aged 20-70 y). Surface electromyography recorded muscle activity in the upper trapezius (UT), middle trapezius (MT), and LT muscles and in the SA, middle deltoid (MD), and triceps during five performance conditions. We used Friedman's test to explore differences in muscle activity across conditions and Bonferroni's post hoc test to explore the differences between conditions. Results: The facilitation technique produced decreased activity in the SA, MD, and triceps muscles (p < 0.01) compared with the self-executed control condition. Compared with optimized posture with independent reach, facilitated movement again produced similar reductions in MD and triceps activity, with decreased LT activity also noted (p < 0.01). Lower activity levels were noted during facilitation than during manual guidance, with or without optimized posture, in the UT, MT, (p < 0.01), SA, and MD muscles (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Triceps facilitation did not increase scapular stability activity, but the activity levels in several other muscle groups (SA, MD, and triceps) were reduced during triceps facilitation compared with optimized posture or guided movement. Detailed analysis of this technique, including co-registered kinematic data and timing of muscle onset, is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":390485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/PTC-2018-0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/PTC-2018-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:神经发育技术通常用于上肢康复,但很少有证据支持与此概念相关的促进技术。本探索性研究确定了三头肌的促进技术是否会影响健康参与者在伸展过程中的肩胸肌活动,并与自我选择的姿势和伸展进行比较。第二个目的是确定促进技术和优化姿势或引导运动之间的肌肉激活水平是否不同。我们还假设肩胛骨稳定器(下斜方肌[LT]和前锯肌[SA])的活动在促进运动期间会比在其他条件下增加。方法:选取17名年龄在20-70岁的健康参与者,通过表面肌电图记录了5种运动状态下上斜方肌(UT)、中斜方肌(MT)、中斜方肌(LT)以及SA、中三角肌(MD)和肱三头肌的肌肉活动。我们使用Friedman的测试来探索不同条件下肌肉活动的差异,使用Bonferroni的事后测试来探索不同条件下肌肉活动的差异。结果:与自我执行的对照组相比,促进技术使SA、MD和肱三头肌的活动降低(p < 0.01)。与独立伸展的优化姿势相比,促进运动再次产生类似的MD和肱三头肌活动减少,LT活动也减少(p < 0.01)。与手动引导相比,在有或没有优化姿势的情况下,在UT、MT、SA和MD肌肉中,促进时的活动水平较低(p < 0.01)。结论:与优化姿势或引导运动相比,三头肌促进并没有增加肩胛骨稳定性活动,但其他几个肌肉群(SA、MD和三头肌)的活动水平在三头肌促进过程中有所降低。需要对该技术进行详细的分析,包括共同注册的运动学数据和肌肉发作的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of the Triceps Brachii Facilitation Technique on Scapulohumeral Muscle Activation during Reach and Point in a Healthy Population.
Purpose: Neurodevelopmental techniques are commonly used in upper limb rehabilitation, but little evidence supports the facilitation techniques associated with this concept. This exploratory study determined whether a facilitation technique at the triceps muscle affected scapulothoracic muscle activity during reach in healthy participants compared with self-selected posture and reach. The secondary aim was to determine whether muscle activation levels differed between the facilitation technique and the optimized posture or guided movement. We also hypothesized that activity in the scapular stabilizers (lower trapezius [LT] and serratus anterior [SA]) would be increased during the facilitated movement than in the other conditions. Methods: The study included 17 healthy participants (aged 20-70 y). Surface electromyography recorded muscle activity in the upper trapezius (UT), middle trapezius (MT), and LT muscles and in the SA, middle deltoid (MD), and triceps during five performance conditions. We used Friedman's test to explore differences in muscle activity across conditions and Bonferroni's post hoc test to explore the differences between conditions. Results: The facilitation technique produced decreased activity in the SA, MD, and triceps muscles (p < 0.01) compared with the self-executed control condition. Compared with optimized posture with independent reach, facilitated movement again produced similar reductions in MD and triceps activity, with decreased LT activity also noted (p < 0.01). Lower activity levels were noted during facilitation than during manual guidance, with or without optimized posture, in the UT, MT, (p < 0.01), SA, and MD muscles (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Triceps facilitation did not increase scapular stability activity, but the activity levels in several other muscle groups (SA, MD, and triceps) were reduced during triceps facilitation compared with optimized posture or guided movement. Detailed analysis of this technique, including co-registered kinematic data and timing of muscle onset, is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信