动态定价方案下的云资源战略竞价

K. Sowmya, R. Sundarraj
{"title":"动态定价方案下的云资源战略竞价","authors":"K. Sowmya, R. Sundarraj","doi":"10.1109/ISCOS.2012.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud computing offers computing and storage services which can be dynamically developed, composed and deployed on virtualized infrastructure. Cloud providers holding excess spare capacity, incentivize customers to purchase it by selling them in a market (spot market), where the prices are derived dynamically based on supply and demand. The cloud providers allow clients to bid on this excess capacity by allocating resources to bidders while their bids exceed a intermittently changing dynamic spot price. In this paper we have used game theory to model the bidding strategies of bidders in a spot market who are attempting to procure the cloud instances, as a prisoner dilemma game. We then analyze real time data from Amazon EC2 spot market to validate this model. In a single shot prisoner dilemma game mutual defection is the Nash equilibrium. We find that a majority (approx. 85%) of bidders choose to Defect which is in-line with the single shot classical prisoner dilemma game. However considering that most bidders in a spot market are repetitive bidders, we propose a Co-operation strategy which is in-line with the Iterated Prisoner Dilemma Game.","PeriodicalId":138078,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Symposium on Cloud and Services Computing","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic Bidding for Cloud Resources under Dynamic Pricing Schemes\",\"authors\":\"K. Sowmya, R. Sundarraj\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCOS.2012.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cloud computing offers computing and storage services which can be dynamically developed, composed and deployed on virtualized infrastructure. Cloud providers holding excess spare capacity, incentivize customers to purchase it by selling them in a market (spot market), where the prices are derived dynamically based on supply and demand. The cloud providers allow clients to bid on this excess capacity by allocating resources to bidders while their bids exceed a intermittently changing dynamic spot price. In this paper we have used game theory to model the bidding strategies of bidders in a spot market who are attempting to procure the cloud instances, as a prisoner dilemma game. We then analyze real time data from Amazon EC2 spot market to validate this model. In a single shot prisoner dilemma game mutual defection is the Nash equilibrium. We find that a majority (approx. 85%) of bidders choose to Defect which is in-line with the single shot classical prisoner dilemma game. However considering that most bidders in a spot market are repetitive bidders, we propose a Co-operation strategy which is in-line with the Iterated Prisoner Dilemma Game.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 International Symposium on Cloud and Services Computing\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 International Symposium on Cloud and Services Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCOS.2012.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Symposium on Cloud and Services Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCOS.2012.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

云计算提供计算和存储服务,这些服务可以在虚拟化基础设施上动态开发、组合和部署。云提供商持有多余的备用容量,通过在市场(现货市场)上出售来激励客户购买,现货市场的价格是根据供需动态得出的。云提供商允许客户在出价超过间歇性变化的动态现货价格时,通过将资源分配给竞标者来竞标这些多余的容量。本文运用博弈论对现货市场中试图购买云实例的竞标者的投标策略进行了建模,并将其作为一个囚徒困境博弈。然后,我们分析了来自Amazon EC2现货市场的实时数据来验证该模型。在单次囚犯困境博弈中,相互背叛是纳什均衡。我们发现,大多数人(大约。85%)的投标者选择叛变,这符合单发经典囚徒困境博弈。然而,考虑到现货市场中的大多数竞标者都是重复竞标者,我们提出了一种符合迭代囚徒困境博弈的合作策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategic Bidding for Cloud Resources under Dynamic Pricing Schemes
Cloud computing offers computing and storage services which can be dynamically developed, composed and deployed on virtualized infrastructure. Cloud providers holding excess spare capacity, incentivize customers to purchase it by selling them in a market (spot market), where the prices are derived dynamically based on supply and demand. The cloud providers allow clients to bid on this excess capacity by allocating resources to bidders while their bids exceed a intermittently changing dynamic spot price. In this paper we have used game theory to model the bidding strategies of bidders in a spot market who are attempting to procure the cloud instances, as a prisoner dilemma game. We then analyze real time data from Amazon EC2 spot market to validate this model. In a single shot prisoner dilemma game mutual defection is the Nash equilibrium. We find that a majority (approx. 85%) of bidders choose to Defect which is in-line with the single shot classical prisoner dilemma game. However considering that most bidders in a spot market are repetitive bidders, we propose a Co-operation strategy which is in-line with the Iterated Prisoner Dilemma Game.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信