利用业务本体制定企业标准

Mark von Rosing, H. Scheel
{"title":"利用业务本体制定企业标准","authors":"Mark von Rosing, H. Scheel","doi":"10.4018/IJCSSA.2016010103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Business Ontology presented in this publication has taken the Global University Alliance's members over a decade to research and develop, spending hundreds of 'man years' to create. One of the major challenges facing practitioners and their interactions with academia is overcoming a presently fragmented way of thinking, working and modelling around enterprise concepts. Business frameworks, methods, approaches and concepts currently have their own vocabulary. Each of these vocabularies has its own definition of terms, including conflicting visual representations. Moody, 2009 This paper therefore elaborates on how the academics have created a rich business taxonomy, defined enterprise meta objects, semantics, enterprise layers as well as the related artefacts. These artefacts have been constructed rigorously to meet up to academic standards and need to be relevant for practitioners as well. Sein, Henfridsson, Purao, Rossi, & Lindgren, 2011 The objectives are therefore to share the business ontology and elaborate on its research and development journey, and how the business ontology helps to remedy the inconsistent use of business relevant terms and the semantic relations between them to create the basis for enterprise relevant models and meta-models. In addition to that, it provides practitioners with the ability to map them to their various ways of thinking, working and modelling. The business ontology will be introduced as a domain ontology and the paper shows how it can be used to develop enterprise standards and industry standards.","PeriodicalId":277615,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Concept. Struct. Smart Appl.","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the Business Ontology to Develop Enterprise Standards\",\"authors\":\"Mark von Rosing, H. Scheel\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IJCSSA.2016010103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Business Ontology presented in this publication has taken the Global University Alliance's members over a decade to research and develop, spending hundreds of 'man years' to create. One of the major challenges facing practitioners and their interactions with academia is overcoming a presently fragmented way of thinking, working and modelling around enterprise concepts. Business frameworks, methods, approaches and concepts currently have their own vocabulary. Each of these vocabularies has its own definition of terms, including conflicting visual representations. Moody, 2009 This paper therefore elaborates on how the academics have created a rich business taxonomy, defined enterprise meta objects, semantics, enterprise layers as well as the related artefacts. These artefacts have been constructed rigorously to meet up to academic standards and need to be relevant for practitioners as well. Sein, Henfridsson, Purao, Rossi, & Lindgren, 2011 The objectives are therefore to share the business ontology and elaborate on its research and development journey, and how the business ontology helps to remedy the inconsistent use of business relevant terms and the semantic relations between them to create the basis for enterprise relevant models and meta-models. In addition to that, it provides practitioners with the ability to map them to their various ways of thinking, working and modelling. The business ontology will be introduced as a domain ontology and the paper shows how it can be used to develop enterprise standards and industry standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Concept. Struct. Smart Appl.\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Concept. Struct. Smart Appl.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCSSA.2016010103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Concept. Struct. Smart Appl.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCSSA.2016010103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

本出版物中介绍的业务本体已经花费了全球大学联盟成员十多年的时间来研究和开发,花费了数百个“人年”来创建。实践者及其与学术界的互动所面临的主要挑战之一是克服目前围绕企业概念的支离破碎的思维方式、工作方式和建模方式。业务框架、方法、途径和概念目前都有自己的词汇表。这些词汇表中的每一个都有自己的术语定义,包括相互冲突的视觉表示。因此,本文详细阐述了学术界是如何创建一个丰富的业务分类法,定义企业元对象、语义、企业层以及相关的工件的。这些人工制品已经被严格地构建以满足学术标准,并且也需要与实践者相关。Sein, Henfridsson, Purao, Rossi, & Lindgren, 2011,因此,我们的目标是分享业务本体并详细说明其研究和开发历程,以及业务本体如何帮助纠正业务相关术语的不一致使用以及它们之间的语义关系,从而为企业相关模型和元模型创建基础。除此之外,它还为从业者提供了将其映射到各种思维,工作和建模方式的能力。本文将业务本体作为领域本体进行介绍,并说明如何利用业务本体制定企业标准和行业标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using the Business Ontology to Develop Enterprise Standards
The Business Ontology presented in this publication has taken the Global University Alliance's members over a decade to research and develop, spending hundreds of 'man years' to create. One of the major challenges facing practitioners and their interactions with academia is overcoming a presently fragmented way of thinking, working and modelling around enterprise concepts. Business frameworks, methods, approaches and concepts currently have their own vocabulary. Each of these vocabularies has its own definition of terms, including conflicting visual representations. Moody, 2009 This paper therefore elaborates on how the academics have created a rich business taxonomy, defined enterprise meta objects, semantics, enterprise layers as well as the related artefacts. These artefacts have been constructed rigorously to meet up to academic standards and need to be relevant for practitioners as well. Sein, Henfridsson, Purao, Rossi, & Lindgren, 2011 The objectives are therefore to share the business ontology and elaborate on its research and development journey, and how the business ontology helps to remedy the inconsistent use of business relevant terms and the semantic relations between them to create the basis for enterprise relevant models and meta-models. In addition to that, it provides practitioners with the ability to map them to their various ways of thinking, working and modelling. The business ontology will be introduced as a domain ontology and the paper shows how it can be used to develop enterprise standards and industry standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信