{"title":"自闭症谱系障碍诊断分类算法的比较","authors":"A. Lawi, F. Aziz","doi":"10.1109/EIConCIT.2018.8878593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ASD sufferers face difficulties in early development compared to normal humans. Various tools, clinical, and non-clinical approaches have been implemented but take a long time to produce a complete diagnosis. the solution by adopting machine learning. This study proposes the application of cross-validation techniques in the Decision Tree method, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression, SVM, and KNN and determines the best k value in each classification method because the shift of datasets when using cross-validation techniques in the classification method is one factor that can cause the estimate to be inaccurate. The results show that the decision tree provides an accuracy of 100% in each of the k values that have been determined previously. 96.9% on Linear Discriminant Analysis with $k=7, k=9$, and $k =10$. 99.7% in Logistic Regression with values of $k=2$ and $k= 3$. 99.9% in Support Vector Machine with values of $k=9$ and $k =1\\theta$ and 94.2% for K-Nearest Neighbors with a value of $k=8$.","PeriodicalId":424909,"journal":{"name":"2018 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Classification Algorithms of the Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis\",\"authors\":\"A. Lawi, F. Aziz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EIConCIT.2018.8878593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ASD sufferers face difficulties in early development compared to normal humans. Various tools, clinical, and non-clinical approaches have been implemented but take a long time to produce a complete diagnosis. the solution by adopting machine learning. This study proposes the application of cross-validation techniques in the Decision Tree method, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression, SVM, and KNN and determines the best k value in each classification method because the shift of datasets when using cross-validation techniques in the classification method is one factor that can cause the estimate to be inaccurate. The results show that the decision tree provides an accuracy of 100% in each of the k values that have been determined previously. 96.9% on Linear Discriminant Analysis with $k=7, k=9$, and $k =10$. 99.7% in Logistic Regression with values of $k=2$ and $k= 3$. 99.9% in Support Vector Machine with values of $k=9$ and $k =1\\\\theta$ and 94.2% for K-Nearest Neighbors with a value of $k=8$.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EIConCIT.2018.8878593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 2nd East Indonesia Conference on Computer and Information Technology (EIConCIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EIConCIT.2018.8878593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Classification Algorithms of the Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis
ASD sufferers face difficulties in early development compared to normal humans. Various tools, clinical, and non-clinical approaches have been implemented but take a long time to produce a complete diagnosis. the solution by adopting machine learning. This study proposes the application of cross-validation techniques in the Decision Tree method, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Logistic Regression, SVM, and KNN and determines the best k value in each classification method because the shift of datasets when using cross-validation techniques in the classification method is one factor that can cause the estimate to be inaccurate. The results show that the decision tree provides an accuracy of 100% in each of the k values that have been determined previously. 96.9% on Linear Discriminant Analysis with $k=7, k=9$, and $k =10$. 99.7% in Logistic Regression with values of $k=2$ and $k= 3$. 99.9% in Support Vector Machine with values of $k=9$ and $k =1\theta$ and 94.2% for K-Nearest Neighbors with a value of $k=8$.