{"title":"C. Valerii . Catulli《卡门》第66篇:附导言、翻译和评注","authors":"K. Larsen","doi":"10.7146/CLASSICAETMEDIAEVALIA.V67I0.111770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \nThis article presents a new critical edition of Catullus’ Carmen 66 along with an introduction, a translation and a textual commentary. The text, based on fresh collations of the manuscripts O and G , deviates from the Oxford text by R.A.B. Mynors in 27 cases. Furthermore, it is the first edition to consider the conventional first two lines of Catullus 67 as the last two lines of Catullus 66, an idea independently conjectured by Alex Agnesini in 2011 and Ian Du Quesnay in 2012. \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":306790,"journal":{"name":"Classica et Mediaevalia","volume":"330 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"C. Valerii Catulli Carmen 66: A Critical Edition with Introduction, Translation and Textual Commentary\",\"authors\":\"K. Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/CLASSICAETMEDIAEVALIA.V67I0.111770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n \\nThis article presents a new critical edition of Catullus’ Carmen 66 along with an introduction, a translation and a textual commentary. The text, based on fresh collations of the manuscripts O and G , deviates from the Oxford text by R.A.B. Mynors in 27 cases. Furthermore, it is the first edition to consider the conventional first two lines of Catullus 67 as the last two lines of Catullus 66, an idea independently conjectured by Alex Agnesini in 2011 and Ian Du Quesnay in 2012. \\n \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":306790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Classica et Mediaevalia\",\"volume\":\"330 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Classica et Mediaevalia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/CLASSICAETMEDIAEVALIA.V67I0.111770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classica et Mediaevalia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/CLASSICAETMEDIAEVALIA.V67I0.111770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文介绍了卡图卢斯的《卡门》66的一个新的批评版本，并附有介绍，翻译和文本评论。该文本基于对手稿O和G的新整理，在27个案例中偏离了R.A.B. Mynors的牛津文本。此外，这是第一次将《Catullus 67》的前两行视为《Catullus 66》的最后两行，这是Alex Agnesini在2011年和Ian Du Quesnay在2012年独立推测出来的想法。
C. Valerii Catulli Carmen 66: A Critical Edition with Introduction, Translation and Textual Commentary
This article presents a new critical edition of Catullus’ Carmen 66 along with an introduction, a translation and a textual commentary. The text, based on fresh collations of the manuscripts O and G , deviates from the Oxford text by R.A.B. Mynors in 27 cases. Furthermore, it is the first edition to consider the conventional first two lines of Catullus 67 as the last two lines of Catullus 66, an idea independently conjectured by Alex Agnesini in 2011 and Ian Du Quesnay in 2012.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
