{"title":"双取代芳香族电化学能量转换系统的浓度依赖性缓蚀:方法比较","authors":"Jessica Roscher, Dan Liu, R. Holze","doi":"10.1515/eetech-2020-0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The suitability of three electrochemical methods commonly used for the assessment of efficiency of corrosion inhibitors in practical applications has been examined by a direct comparison of relevant results with an aromatic corrosion inhibitor as example. Discrepancies between results are discussed, practical approaches taking inherent weaknesses of the methods are indicated.","PeriodicalId":443383,"journal":{"name":"Electrochemical Energy Technology","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concentration-dependent corrosion inhibition with electrochemical energy conversion systems by a disubstituted aromatic: A comparison of methods\",\"authors\":\"Jessica Roscher, Dan Liu, R. Holze\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/eetech-2020-0101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The suitability of three electrochemical methods commonly used for the assessment of efficiency of corrosion inhibitors in practical applications has been examined by a direct comparison of relevant results with an aromatic corrosion inhibitor as example. Discrepancies between results are discussed, practical approaches taking inherent weaknesses of the methods are indicated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electrochemical Energy Technology\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electrochemical Energy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/eetech-2020-0101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electrochemical Energy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/eetech-2020-0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Concentration-dependent corrosion inhibition with electrochemical energy conversion systems by a disubstituted aromatic: A comparison of methods
Abstract The suitability of three electrochemical methods commonly used for the assessment of efficiency of corrosion inhibitors in practical applications has been examined by a direct comparison of relevant results with an aromatic corrosion inhibitor as example. Discrepancies between results are discussed, practical approaches taking inherent weaknesses of the methods are indicated.