Quod fuimus, estis; quod sumus, vos eritis.同一性、改变性、承认和原则限制的辩证法

Břetislav Horyna
{"title":"Quod fuimus, estis; quod sumus, vos eritis.同一性、改变性、承认和原则限制的辩证法","authors":"Břetislav Horyna","doi":"10.17846/PC.2019.5.2.30-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study “Quod fuimus, estis; quod sumus, vos eritis. The Dialectic of Identity, Alterity, Recognition and the Limits of Principle” deals with a problem which has achieved significant attention from the scientific literature of today (psychology, social psychology, sociol-ogy), media, the public, but also of course philosophy and philosophical anthropology: on the question of a person’s identity and self-identification. It provides a partial overview of the different approaches to identity from various fields and comes to terms with crucial issues of national and cultural identity in its critique. The author concludes the study with the statement that the problem of identity often tends to be overestimated for political rather than scientific and philosophical reasons, something which often de-scends into the legitimisation of nationalism.","PeriodicalId":166511,"journal":{"name":"Philosophica Critica","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quod fuimus, estis; quod sumus, vos eritis. Dialektika identity, alterity, uznání a mezí principu\",\"authors\":\"Břetislav Horyna\",\"doi\":\"10.17846/PC.2019.5.2.30-45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study “Quod fuimus, estis; quod sumus, vos eritis. The Dialectic of Identity, Alterity, Recognition and the Limits of Principle” deals with a problem which has achieved significant attention from the scientific literature of today (psychology, social psychology, sociol-ogy), media, the public, but also of course philosophy and philosophical anthropology: on the question of a person’s identity and self-identification. It provides a partial overview of the different approaches to identity from various fields and comes to terms with crucial issues of national and cultural identity in its critique. The author concludes the study with the statement that the problem of identity often tends to be overestimated for political rather than scientific and philosophical reasons, something which often de-scends into the legitimisation of nationalism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophica Critica\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophica Critica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17846/PC.2019.5.2.30-45\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophica Critica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17846/PC.2019.5.2.30-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

“上帝保佑”的研究;上帝和我们,上帝和我们。《认同、另类、认同和原则极限的辩证法》探讨了一个问题,这个问题已经引起了当今科学文献(心理学、社会心理学、社会学)、媒体、公众,当然还有哲学和哲学人类学的极大关注:关于一个人的认同和自我认同的问题。它提供了来自不同领域的不同认同方法的部分概述,并在其批判中与国家和文化认同的关键问题达成协议。作者在总结研究时指出,身份问题往往因为政治原因而不是科学和哲学原因而被高估,这往往会导致民族主义的合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quod fuimus, estis; quod sumus, vos eritis. Dialektika identity, alterity, uznání a mezí principu
The study “Quod fuimus, estis; quod sumus, vos eritis. The Dialectic of Identity, Alterity, Recognition and the Limits of Principle” deals with a problem which has achieved significant attention from the scientific literature of today (psychology, social psychology, sociol-ogy), media, the public, but also of course philosophy and philosophical anthropology: on the question of a person’s identity and self-identification. It provides a partial overview of the different approaches to identity from various fields and comes to terms with crucial issues of national and cultural identity in its critique. The author concludes the study with the statement that the problem of identity often tends to be overestimated for political rather than scientific and philosophical reasons, something which often de-scends into the legitimisation of nationalism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信