通往共同目标的两条必经之路:对柳青的反驳

M. Kinzer
{"title":"通往共同目标的两条必经之路:对柳青的反驳","authors":"M. Kinzer","doi":"10.1177/10638512221093265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this rejoinder to Antoine Lévy, I reflect upon his main points, taking them up in the order in which he has raised them. I seek to clarify aspects of my article and my other writings that Lévy has misunderstood, elaborate on ideas that were previously undeveloped, and demonstrate how my ongoing dialogue with Lévy has led me to revise and refine some of my previous positions.","PeriodicalId":223812,"journal":{"name":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Necessary Paths to a Common Destination: A Rejoinder to Lévy\",\"authors\":\"M. Kinzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10638512221093265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this rejoinder to Antoine Lévy, I reflect upon his main points, taking them up in the order in which he has raised them. I seek to clarify aspects of my article and my other writings that Lévy has misunderstood, elaborate on ideas that were previously undeveloped, and demonstrate how my ongoing dialogue with Lévy has led me to revise and refine some of my previous positions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":223812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10638512221093265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10638512221093265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇对安托万·莱姆斯维的答辩中,我对他的主要观点进行了反思,并按照他提出这些观点的先后顺序进行了整理。我试图澄清我的文章和我的其他作品中被lsamuy误解的方面,详细说明以前未开发的想法,并展示我与lsamuy的持续对话如何使我修改和完善我以前的一些立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two Necessary Paths to a Common Destination: A Rejoinder to Lévy
In this rejoinder to Antoine Lévy, I reflect upon his main points, taking them up in the order in which he has raised them. I seek to clarify aspects of my article and my other writings that Lévy has misunderstood, elaborate on ideas that were previously undeveloped, and demonstrate how my ongoing dialogue with Lévy has led me to revise and refine some of my previous positions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信