[ⅱ类和ⅱ类牙槽修复体的临床评价。][3]牙科学校与社区牙科机构的比较。

Stomatologie der DDR Pub Date : 1990-04-01
M Weiland, H Nossek, P Schulz
{"title":"[ⅱ类和ⅱ类牙槽修复体的临床评价。][3]牙科学校与社区牙科机构的比较。","authors":"M Weiland,&nbsp;H Nossek,&nbsp;P Schulz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparison of conventional amalgam restorations produced either in dental college by students or in out-patient department showed that the portion of clinical acceptable restorations was higher at the college. The frequency of secondary caries was distinctively higher in the out-patient department (28.2%) than in the college (16.4%). Secondary caries mainly caused unacceptable quality of fillings of both the institutions. Causes brought about by material defect prevailed at the dental school. In the community errors of preparation mainly led to secondary caries.</p>","PeriodicalId":76559,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologie der DDR","volume":"40 4","pages":"155-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Clinical evaluation of the amalagam restorations for cavities Class I and Class II. 3: Comparison between dental school and dental institutions in the community].\",\"authors\":\"M Weiland,&nbsp;H Nossek,&nbsp;P Schulz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Comparison of conventional amalgam restorations produced either in dental college by students or in out-patient department showed that the portion of clinical acceptable restorations was higher at the college. The frequency of secondary caries was distinctively higher in the out-patient department (28.2%) than in the college (16.4%). Secondary caries mainly caused unacceptable quality of fillings of both the institutions. Causes brought about by material defect prevailed at the dental school. In the community errors of preparation mainly led to secondary caries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stomatologie der DDR\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"155-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stomatologie der DDR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologie der DDR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对比牙科学院学生制作的常规汞合金修复体和门诊制作的汞合金修复体,发现该学院的临床可接受修复体比例更高。门诊部继发龋发病率(28.2%)明显高于学院(16.4%)。继发龋病的主要原因是两所院校的补牙质量不合格。材料缺陷的原因在牙科学校占了上风。在社区中,准备错误主要导致继发性龋病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Clinical evaluation of the amalagam restorations for cavities Class I and Class II. 3: Comparison between dental school and dental institutions in the community].

Comparison of conventional amalgam restorations produced either in dental college by students or in out-patient department showed that the portion of clinical acceptable restorations was higher at the college. The frequency of secondary caries was distinctively higher in the out-patient department (28.2%) than in the college (16.4%). Secondary caries mainly caused unacceptable quality of fillings of both the institutions. Causes brought about by material defect prevailed at the dental school. In the community errors of preparation mainly led to secondary caries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信