罗马研究中复杂性科学的形式化建模方法:宣言

Tom Brughmans, J. Hanson, Matthew J. Mandich, I. Romanowska, X. Rubio-Campillo, S. Carrignon, Stephen A. Collins-Elliott, Katherine A. Crawford, Dries Daems, Francesca Fulminante, Tymon de Haas, P. Kelly, Maria del Carmen Moreno Escobar, Eleftheria Paliou, L. Prignano, M. Ritondale
{"title":"罗马研究中复杂性科学的形式化建模方法:宣言","authors":"Tom Brughmans, J. Hanson, Matthew J. Mandich, I. Romanowska, X. Rubio-Campillo, S. Carrignon, Stephen A. Collins-Elliott, Katherine A. Crawford, Dries Daems, Francesca Fulminante, Tymon de Haas, P. Kelly, Maria del Carmen Moreno Escobar, Eleftheria Paliou, L. Prignano, M. Ritondale","doi":"10.16995/TRAJ.367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Complexity science refers to the theoretical research perspectives and the formal modelling tools designed to study complex systems. A complex system consists of separate entities interacting following a set of (often simple) rules that collectively give rise to unexpected patterns featuring vastly different properties than the entities that produced them. In recent years a number of case studies have shown that such approaches have great potential for furthering our understanding of the past phenomena explored in Roman Studies. We argue complexity science and formal modelling have great potential for Roman Studies by offering four key advantages: (1) the ability to deal with emergent properties in complex Roman systems; (2) the means to formally specify theories about past Roman phenomena; (3) the power to test aspects of these theories as hypotheses using formal modelling approaches; and (4) the capacity to do all of this in a transparent, reproducible, and cumulative scientific framework. We present a ten-point manifesto that articulates arguments for the more common use in Roman Studies of perspectives, concepts and tools from the broader field of complexity science, which are complementary to empirical inductive approaches. There will be a need for constant constructive collaboration between Romanists with diverse fields of expertise in order to usefully embed complexity science and formal modelling in Roman Studies.","PeriodicalId":393384,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Roman Archaeology Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal Modelling Approaches to Complexity Science in Roman Studies: A Manifesto\",\"authors\":\"Tom Brughmans, J. Hanson, Matthew J. Mandich, I. Romanowska, X. Rubio-Campillo, S. Carrignon, Stephen A. Collins-Elliott, Katherine A. Crawford, Dries Daems, Francesca Fulminante, Tymon de Haas, P. Kelly, Maria del Carmen Moreno Escobar, Eleftheria Paliou, L. Prignano, M. Ritondale\",\"doi\":\"10.16995/TRAJ.367\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Complexity science refers to the theoretical research perspectives and the formal modelling tools designed to study complex systems. A complex system consists of separate entities interacting following a set of (often simple) rules that collectively give rise to unexpected patterns featuring vastly different properties than the entities that produced them. In recent years a number of case studies have shown that such approaches have great potential for furthering our understanding of the past phenomena explored in Roman Studies. We argue complexity science and formal modelling have great potential for Roman Studies by offering four key advantages: (1) the ability to deal with emergent properties in complex Roman systems; (2) the means to formally specify theories about past Roman phenomena; (3) the power to test aspects of these theories as hypotheses using formal modelling approaches; and (4) the capacity to do all of this in a transparent, reproducible, and cumulative scientific framework. We present a ten-point manifesto that articulates arguments for the more common use in Roman Studies of perspectives, concepts and tools from the broader field of complexity science, which are complementary to empirical inductive approaches. There will be a need for constant constructive collaboration between Romanists with diverse fields of expertise in order to usefully embed complexity science and formal modelling in Roman Studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Roman Archaeology Journal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Roman Archaeology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16995/TRAJ.367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Roman Archaeology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/TRAJ.367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

复杂性科学是指为研究复杂系统而设计的理论研究视角和形式化建模工具。一个复杂的系统由独立的实体组成,这些实体遵循一组(通常是简单的)规则进行交互,这些规则共同产生意想不到的模式,这些模式具有与产生它们的实体截然不同的特性。近年来,一些案例研究表明,这种方法有很大的潜力,可以进一步加深我们对罗马研究中所探索的过去现象的理解。我们认为,复杂性科学和形式建模为罗马研究提供了四个关键优势,具有巨大的潜力:(1)能够处理复杂罗马系统中的紧急属性;(2)正式指定关于过去罗马现象的理论的方法;(3)使用正式建模方法测试这些理论作为假设的能力;(4)在透明、可复制和累积的科学框架下完成所有这些工作的能力。我们提出了一个十点宣言,阐明了罗马研究中更普遍使用的观点、概念和工具,这些观点、概念和工具来自更广泛的复杂性科学领域,是对经验归纳方法的补充。为了在罗马研究中有效地嵌入复杂科学和形式建模,不同专业领域的罗马学者之间需要不断的建设性合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formal Modelling Approaches to Complexity Science in Roman Studies: A Manifesto
Complexity science refers to the theoretical research perspectives and the formal modelling tools designed to study complex systems. A complex system consists of separate entities interacting following a set of (often simple) rules that collectively give rise to unexpected patterns featuring vastly different properties than the entities that produced them. In recent years a number of case studies have shown that such approaches have great potential for furthering our understanding of the past phenomena explored in Roman Studies. We argue complexity science and formal modelling have great potential for Roman Studies by offering four key advantages: (1) the ability to deal with emergent properties in complex Roman systems; (2) the means to formally specify theories about past Roman phenomena; (3) the power to test aspects of these theories as hypotheses using formal modelling approaches; and (4) the capacity to do all of this in a transparent, reproducible, and cumulative scientific framework. We present a ten-point manifesto that articulates arguments for the more common use in Roman Studies of perspectives, concepts and tools from the broader field of complexity science, which are complementary to empirical inductive approaches. There will be a need for constant constructive collaboration between Romanists with diverse fields of expertise in order to usefully embed complexity science and formal modelling in Roman Studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信