在亚齐登嘉拉 MIN 1 通过学术监督提高任课教师根据科学方法编写教案的能力

Sri Darmayanti
{"title":"在亚齐登嘉拉 MIN 1 通过学术监督提高任课教师根据科学方法编写教案的能力","authors":"Sri Darmayanti","doi":"10.32672/jp2v.v1i2.2065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem in this School Action Research (PTS) is the understanding of classroom teachers in the preparation of the 2013 Curriculum RPP is still far from expectations. There are several things that be-come obstacles including: (1) The creativity and innovation of classroom teachers is relatively low; (2) Teachers still adopt the example RPP from KTSP 2006; where there are still competency standards found in the content standards not in the syllabus; (3) Learning objectives have not been arranged logi-cally; (4) the flow of the learning implementation plan prepared has not been based on a scientific ap-proach and has not shown the stages of exploration, elaboration and confirmation activities, so that the lesson plans are made less meaningful; and (5) An authentic assessment plan is not yet visible, and so on. This requires efforts to improve the quality, guidance, motivation and direction of the School Princi-pal. This study intends to describe the efforts to improve the ability of MIN 1 grade teachers in South-east Aceh as many as 3 representatives of class teachers in preparing Learning Implementation Plan (RPP) Based on Scientific Approaches through academic supervision activities. Academic supervision is a coaching model conducted by the Principal to the teacher to help solve problems related to learning activities so that the quality of learning can be achieved optimally. Madrasah Action Research (PTM) includes quantitative research using Comparative Descriptive Analysis by comparing the results of the initial conditions with the results of Cycle I local level upgrading techniques (In House Training) and the results of Cycle II with personal conversation techniques. The procedures performed in this study in-clude planning, implementing actions, observations and reflections that are recycled or cyclical. This research was conducted in two cycles. The average quality of RPP Based on Scientific Approach in Pre-Cycle conditions was 71.66 (less category). The average quality of RPP Based on Scientific Approach in Cycle I was 86.33 (good category). Increased results of Cycle I compared to initial conditions was 18%. While the average quality of RPP Based on Scientific Approach in Cycle II is 98.66 (very good catego-ry). The increase in the results of Cycle II compared to the results of Cycle I was 12.33%. Thus, aca-demic supervision can improve the ability of MIN 1 Aceh Tenggara class teachers in the preparation of a lesson plan based on a scientific approach significantly.","PeriodicalId":223845,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Vokasi (JP2V)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peningkatan kemampuan guru kelas dalam Penyusunan RPP berbasis pendekatan saintifik melalui Supervisi akademik MIN 1 Aceh Tenggara\",\"authors\":\"Sri Darmayanti\",\"doi\":\"10.32672/jp2v.v1i2.2065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem in this School Action Research (PTS) is the understanding of classroom teachers in the preparation of the 2013 Curriculum RPP is still far from expectations. There are several things that be-come obstacles including: (1) The creativity and innovation of classroom teachers is relatively low; (2) Teachers still adopt the example RPP from KTSP 2006; where there are still competency standards found in the content standards not in the syllabus; (3) Learning objectives have not been arranged logi-cally; (4) the flow of the learning implementation plan prepared has not been based on a scientific ap-proach and has not shown the stages of exploration, elaboration and confirmation activities, so that the lesson plans are made less meaningful; and (5) An authentic assessment plan is not yet visible, and so on. This requires efforts to improve the quality, guidance, motivation and direction of the School Princi-pal. This study intends to describe the efforts to improve the ability of MIN 1 grade teachers in South-east Aceh as many as 3 representatives of class teachers in preparing Learning Implementation Plan (RPP) Based on Scientific Approaches through academic supervision activities. Academic supervision is a coaching model conducted by the Principal to the teacher to help solve problems related to learning activities so that the quality of learning can be achieved optimally. Madrasah Action Research (PTM) includes quantitative research using Comparative Descriptive Analysis by comparing the results of the initial conditions with the results of Cycle I local level upgrading techniques (In House Training) and the results of Cycle II with personal conversation techniques. The procedures performed in this study in-clude planning, implementing actions, observations and reflections that are recycled or cyclical. This research was conducted in two cycles. The average quality of RPP Based on Scientific Approach in Pre-Cycle conditions was 71.66 (less category). The average quality of RPP Based on Scientific Approach in Cycle I was 86.33 (good category). Increased results of Cycle I compared to initial conditions was 18%. While the average quality of RPP Based on Scientific Approach in Cycle II is 98.66 (very good catego-ry). The increase in the results of Cycle II compared to the results of Cycle I was 12.33%. Thus, aca-demic supervision can improve the ability of MIN 1 Aceh Tenggara class teachers in the preparation of a lesson plan based on a scientific approach significantly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":223845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Vokasi (JP2V)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Vokasi (JP2V)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32672/jp2v.v1i2.2065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengabdian Vokasi (JP2V)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32672/jp2v.v1i2.2065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本次学校行动研究(PTS)的问题在于课堂教师对2013年课程RPP编制的理解与预期相差甚远。存在以下几方面的障碍:(1)课堂教师的创造性和创新性相对较低;(2)教师仍然采用KTSP 2006中的RPP范例;在内容标准中仍有能力标准,而不在教学大纲中;(3)学习目标没有合理安排;(4)制定学习实施计划的流程没有以科学的方法为基础,没有表现出探索、阐述和确认活动的阶段,使教案制定的意义不大;(5)尚未形成真实的评估方案等。这就需要校长努力提高教学质量、指导、激励和方向。本研究旨在描述东南亚齐省(south Aceh)小学一年级教师(多达3名班主任代表)如何透过学术督导活动,以提高基于科学方法的学习实施计划(RPP)的编制能力。学业督导是校长对教师进行辅导的一种模式,目的是帮助教师解决学习活动中出现的问题,使学习质量达到最佳。Madrasah行动研究(PTM)包括使用比较描述性分析的定量研究,通过将初始条件的结果与第一轮本地水平提升技术(内部培训)的结果进行比较,并将第二轮的结果与个人对话技术进行比较。在本研究中执行的程序包括计划、实施行动、观察和反思,这些都是循环或循环的。这项研究分两个周期进行。循环前条件下基于科学方法的RPP平均质量为71.66(少类)。周期1基于科学方法的RPP的平均质量为86.33(良类)。与初始条件相比,周期I的结果增加了18%。而周期II基于科学方法的RPP平均质量为98.66(非常好)。与第1周期相比,第2周期的结果增加了12.33%。因此,学术监督可以显著提高MIN 1亚齐登加拉班教师基于科学方法编制教案的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peningkatan kemampuan guru kelas dalam Penyusunan RPP berbasis pendekatan saintifik melalui Supervisi akademik MIN 1 Aceh Tenggara
The problem in this School Action Research (PTS) is the understanding of classroom teachers in the preparation of the 2013 Curriculum RPP is still far from expectations. There are several things that be-come obstacles including: (1) The creativity and innovation of classroom teachers is relatively low; (2) Teachers still adopt the example RPP from KTSP 2006; where there are still competency standards found in the content standards not in the syllabus; (3) Learning objectives have not been arranged logi-cally; (4) the flow of the learning implementation plan prepared has not been based on a scientific ap-proach and has not shown the stages of exploration, elaboration and confirmation activities, so that the lesson plans are made less meaningful; and (5) An authentic assessment plan is not yet visible, and so on. This requires efforts to improve the quality, guidance, motivation and direction of the School Princi-pal. This study intends to describe the efforts to improve the ability of MIN 1 grade teachers in South-east Aceh as many as 3 representatives of class teachers in preparing Learning Implementation Plan (RPP) Based on Scientific Approaches through academic supervision activities. Academic supervision is a coaching model conducted by the Principal to the teacher to help solve problems related to learning activities so that the quality of learning can be achieved optimally. Madrasah Action Research (PTM) includes quantitative research using Comparative Descriptive Analysis by comparing the results of the initial conditions with the results of Cycle I local level upgrading techniques (In House Training) and the results of Cycle II with personal conversation techniques. The procedures performed in this study in-clude planning, implementing actions, observations and reflections that are recycled or cyclical. This research was conducted in two cycles. The average quality of RPP Based on Scientific Approach in Pre-Cycle conditions was 71.66 (less category). The average quality of RPP Based on Scientific Approach in Cycle I was 86.33 (good category). Increased results of Cycle I compared to initial conditions was 18%. While the average quality of RPP Based on Scientific Approach in Cycle II is 98.66 (very good catego-ry). The increase in the results of Cycle II compared to the results of Cycle I was 12.33%. Thus, aca-demic supervision can improve the ability of MIN 1 Aceh Tenggara class teachers in the preparation of a lesson plan based on a scientific approach significantly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信