混合债券作为银行部门连续融资的一种策略

J. Fajardo, L. Mendes, R. Leite
{"title":"混合债券作为银行部门连续融资的一种策略","authors":"J. Fajardo, L. Mendes, R. Leite","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3933950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Up to this point, the literature on the issuance of convertible bonds has neglected financial institutions. Contrary to firms, banks not only can issue convertible bonds but also, after the subprime crises, contingent convertible (CoCo) bonds emerged as an alternative. Hence, the purpose of this study is threefold: first, we expand the literature on the motivation to issue convertible bonds in the banking sector; second, we introduce a new proxy (Loans-Deposits Flow) to measure the reinvestment in this sector; and third, we analyze the differences in the motivation for issuing CoCo bonds when compared to convertible bonds. Our results show that the theory of sequential financing is not confirmed for CoCo bonds in the banking sector. Additionally, we provide evidence that banks issue CoCo bonds for regulatory purposes (to increase their capital), while convertibles are issued to allow banks to expand their investments and loan portfolios. The results are robust to several specifications including a propensity-score matching and a difference-in-difference analysis.","PeriodicalId":331807,"journal":{"name":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid Bonds as a strategy of sequential finance in the banking sector\",\"authors\":\"J. Fajardo, L. Mendes, R. Leite\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3933950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Up to this point, the literature on the issuance of convertible bonds has neglected financial institutions. Contrary to firms, banks not only can issue convertible bonds but also, after the subprime crises, contingent convertible (CoCo) bonds emerged as an alternative. Hence, the purpose of this study is threefold: first, we expand the literature on the motivation to issue convertible bonds in the banking sector; second, we introduce a new proxy (Loans-Deposits Flow) to measure the reinvestment in this sector; and third, we analyze the differences in the motivation for issuing CoCo bonds when compared to convertible bonds. Our results show that the theory of sequential financing is not confirmed for CoCo bonds in the banking sector. Additionally, we provide evidence that banks issue CoCo bonds for regulatory purposes (to increase their capital), while convertibles are issued to allow banks to expand their investments and loan portfolios. The results are robust to several specifications including a propensity-score matching and a difference-in-difference analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Banking & Insurance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3933950\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banking & Insurance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3933950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

到目前为止,关于可转换债券发行的文献忽略了金融机构。与公司相反,银行不仅可以发行可转换债券,而且在次贷危机之后,或有可转换债券(CoCo)也作为一种选择出现了。因此,本研究的目的有三个:首先,我们扩展了关于银行部门发行可转债动机的文献;其次,我们引入了一个新的代理(贷款-存款流量)来衡量该部门的再投资;第三,我们分析了可转换债券与可转换债券发行动机的差异。我们的研究结果表明,顺序融资理论并不适用于银行部门的CoCo债券。此外,我们提供的证据表明,银行发行CoCo债券是出于监管目的(增加资本),而发行可转换债券是为了允许银行扩大其投资和贷款组合。结果对包括倾向得分匹配和差异中差异分析在内的几个规范具有鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hybrid Bonds as a strategy of sequential finance in the banking sector
Up to this point, the literature on the issuance of convertible bonds has neglected financial institutions. Contrary to firms, banks not only can issue convertible bonds but also, after the subprime crises, contingent convertible (CoCo) bonds emerged as an alternative. Hence, the purpose of this study is threefold: first, we expand the literature on the motivation to issue convertible bonds in the banking sector; second, we introduce a new proxy (Loans-Deposits Flow) to measure the reinvestment in this sector; and third, we analyze the differences in the motivation for issuing CoCo bonds when compared to convertible bonds. Our results show that the theory of sequential financing is not confirmed for CoCo bonds in the banking sector. Additionally, we provide evidence that banks issue CoCo bonds for regulatory purposes (to increase their capital), while convertibles are issued to allow banks to expand their investments and loan portfolios. The results are robust to several specifications including a propensity-score matching and a difference-in-difference analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信