{"title":"基于机器翻译的越南语变音符恢复方法研究","authors":"Thai-Hoang Pham, Xuan-Khoai Pham, Hong Phuong Le","doi":"10.1109/IALP.2017.8300596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an empirical study of two machine translation-based approaches for Vietnamese diacritic restoration problem, including phrase-based and neural-based machine translation models. This is the first work that applies neural-based machine translation method to this problem and gives a thorough comparison to the phrase-based machine translation method which is the current state-of-the-art method for this problem. On a large dataset, the phrase-based approach has an accuracy of 97.32% while that of the neural-based approach is 96.15%. While the neural-based method has a slightly lower accuracy, it is about twice faster than the phrase-based method in terms of inference speed. Moreover, neural-based machine translation method has much room for future improvement such as incorporating pre-trained word embeddings and collecting more training data.","PeriodicalId":183586,"journal":{"name":"2017 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP)","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the use of machine translation-based approaches for vietnamese diacritic restoration\",\"authors\":\"Thai-Hoang Pham, Xuan-Khoai Pham, Hong Phuong Le\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IALP.2017.8300596\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents an empirical study of two machine translation-based approaches for Vietnamese diacritic restoration problem, including phrase-based and neural-based machine translation models. This is the first work that applies neural-based machine translation method to this problem and gives a thorough comparison to the phrase-based machine translation method which is the current state-of-the-art method for this problem. On a large dataset, the phrase-based approach has an accuracy of 97.32% while that of the neural-based approach is 96.15%. While the neural-based method has a slightly lower accuracy, it is about twice faster than the phrase-based method in terms of inference speed. Moreover, neural-based machine translation method has much room for future improvement such as incorporating pre-trained word embeddings and collecting more training data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP)\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IALP.2017.8300596\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 International Conference on Asian Language Processing (IALP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IALP.2017.8300596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the use of machine translation-based approaches for vietnamese diacritic restoration
This paper presents an empirical study of two machine translation-based approaches for Vietnamese diacritic restoration problem, including phrase-based and neural-based machine translation models. This is the first work that applies neural-based machine translation method to this problem and gives a thorough comparison to the phrase-based machine translation method which is the current state-of-the-art method for this problem. On a large dataset, the phrase-based approach has an accuracy of 97.32% while that of the neural-based approach is 96.15%. While the neural-based method has a slightly lower accuracy, it is about twice faster than the phrase-based method in terms of inference speed. Moreover, neural-based machine translation method has much room for future improvement such as incorporating pre-trained word embeddings and collecting more training data.