Chapel程序设计语言的实证性能研究

N. Dun, K. Taura
{"title":"Chapel程序设计语言的实证性能研究","authors":"N. Dun, K. Taura","doi":"10.1109/IPDPSW.2012.64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we evaluate the performance of the Chapel programming language from the perspective of its language primitives and features, where the microbenchmarks are synthesized from our lessons learned in developing molecular dynamics simulation programs in Chapel. Experimental results show that most language building blocks have comparable performance to corresponding hand-written C code, while the complex applications can achieve up to 70% of the performance of C implementation. We identify several causes of overhead that can be further optimized by Chapel compiler. This work not only helps Chapel users understand the performance implication of using Chapel, but also provides useful feedbacks for Chapel developers to make a better compiler.","PeriodicalId":378335,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE 26th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops & PhD Forum","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Performance Study of Chapel Programming Language\",\"authors\":\"N. Dun, K. Taura\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IPDPSW.2012.64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we evaluate the performance of the Chapel programming language from the perspective of its language primitives and features, where the microbenchmarks are synthesized from our lessons learned in developing molecular dynamics simulation programs in Chapel. Experimental results show that most language building blocks have comparable performance to corresponding hand-written C code, while the complex applications can achieve up to 70% of the performance of C implementation. We identify several causes of overhead that can be further optimized by Chapel compiler. This work not only helps Chapel users understand the performance implication of using Chapel, but also provides useful feedbacks for Chapel developers to make a better compiler.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE 26th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops & PhD Forum\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE 26th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops & PhD Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW.2012.64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE 26th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops & PhD Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPDPSW.2012.64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

在本文中,我们从其语言原语和功能的角度评估了Chapel编程语言的性能,其中微基准是根据我们在Chapel开发分子动力学模拟程序中吸取的经验教训合成的。实验结果表明,大多数语言构建块的性能与相应的手工编写的C代码相当,而复杂的应用程序可以达到C实现性能的70%。我们确定了几个开销的原因,可以通过Chapel编译器进一步优化。这项工作不仅帮助Chapel用户了解使用Chapel的性能含义,而且还为Chapel开发人员提供了有用的反馈,以制作更好的编译器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Empirical Performance Study of Chapel Programming Language
In this paper we evaluate the performance of the Chapel programming language from the perspective of its language primitives and features, where the microbenchmarks are synthesized from our lessons learned in developing molecular dynamics simulation programs in Chapel. Experimental results show that most language building blocks have comparable performance to corresponding hand-written C code, while the complex applications can achieve up to 70% of the performance of C implementation. We identify several causes of overhead that can be further optimized by Chapel compiler. This work not only helps Chapel users understand the performance implication of using Chapel, but also provides useful feedbacks for Chapel developers to make a better compiler.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信