M. Panin, N. Zagorodniy, Andrey V. Boiko, Armenak S. Petrosyan
{"title":"全髋关节置换术治疗严重股骨头坏死和骨关节炎:结果和并发症","authors":"M. Panin, N. Zagorodniy, Andrey V. Boiko, Armenak S. Petrosyan","doi":"10.17816/vto109955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Nowadays total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the method of choice for the treatment of late stages osteonecrosis of the femoral head (OFH) and osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip joint. \nOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and complication pattern of THA in late stages of OFH and OA. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 74 patients who underwent primary THA for OA stages IIIIV (Kellgren and Lawrence classification) and for OFH stages IIIIV (ARCO classification). Group 1 included 34 patients with OFH stages IIIIV, and group 2 40 patients with OA stages IIIIV. The groups were comparable by gender and age. All patients underwent implantation of endoprosthesis components using press-fit fixation with a metalpolyethylene articulation. Treatment results were assessed with regard to the incidence of complications and functional results at 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after THA. \nRESULTS: In our study, the survival rate of components after THA within 3 years after implantation was 100%. No cases of periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic infection, and aseptic instability of endoprosthesis components were observed in both groups. The surface inflammation of the postoperative wound was detected in 1 (2.9%) patient in the OFH group and in 1 (2.5%) patient in OA group. Dislocation of the endoprosthesis occurred in 1 patient with OFH; there were no such findings in the OA group. The frequency of peri-implant osteolysis was twice lower (2.5%) in patients with OA compared to OFH group (5.8%). There were no statistically significant differences in the functional results dynamics before and after surgery between the groups (Harris score). The average Harris scale score in patients with OFH was 63 and reached 94 after 3 years; in OA group 58 and 94, respectively. \nCONCLUSION: THA is an alternative method in the treatment of severe hip arthroplasty. Endoprosthetics using a cementless endoprosthesis with a metalpolyethylene articulation demonstrated high efficacy as well as a low number of complications among patients with OFH and OA. We found no significant difference in THA results in terms of survival, postoperative complications, and functional outcome in patients with OFH and OA. Longer postoperative follow-up is advisable, which may allow us to establish some differences in treatment outcomes.","PeriodicalId":308632,"journal":{"name":"N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of severe stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head and osteoarthritis: results and complications\",\"authors\":\"M. Panin, N. Zagorodniy, Andrey V. Boiko, Armenak S. Petrosyan\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/vto109955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Nowadays total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the method of choice for the treatment of late stages osteonecrosis of the femoral head (OFH) and osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip joint. \\nOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and complication pattern of THA in late stages of OFH and OA. \\nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 74 patients who underwent primary THA for OA stages IIIIV (Kellgren and Lawrence classification) and for OFH stages IIIIV (ARCO classification). Group 1 included 34 patients with OFH stages IIIIV, and group 2 40 patients with OA stages IIIIV. The groups were comparable by gender and age. All patients underwent implantation of endoprosthesis components using press-fit fixation with a metalpolyethylene articulation. Treatment results were assessed with regard to the incidence of complications and functional results at 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after THA. \\nRESULTS: In our study, the survival rate of components after THA within 3 years after implantation was 100%. No cases of periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic infection, and aseptic instability of endoprosthesis components were observed in both groups. The surface inflammation of the postoperative wound was detected in 1 (2.9%) patient in the OFH group and in 1 (2.5%) patient in OA group. Dislocation of the endoprosthesis occurred in 1 patient with OFH; there were no such findings in the OA group. The frequency of peri-implant osteolysis was twice lower (2.5%) in patients with OA compared to OFH group (5.8%). There were no statistically significant differences in the functional results dynamics before and after surgery between the groups (Harris score). The average Harris scale score in patients with OFH was 63 and reached 94 after 3 years; in OA group 58 and 94, respectively. \\nCONCLUSION: THA is an alternative method in the treatment of severe hip arthroplasty. Endoprosthetics using a cementless endoprosthesis with a metalpolyethylene articulation demonstrated high efficacy as well as a low number of complications among patients with OFH and OA. We found no significant difference in THA results in terms of survival, postoperative complications, and functional outcome in patients with OFH and OA. Longer postoperative follow-up is advisable, which may allow us to establish some differences in treatment outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/vto109955\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/vto109955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:目前全髋关节置换术(THA)是治疗晚期股骨头骨坏死(OFH)和髋关节骨关节炎(OA)的首选方法。目的:评价全髋关节置换术治疗晚期OFH和OA的疗效及并发症类型。材料和方法:该研究包括74例OA iii ~ iv期(kelgren和Lawrence分级)和OFH iii ~ iv期(ARCO分级)的患者。组1包括34例OFH iii - iv期患者,组2包括40例OA iii - iv期患者。这些组在性别和年龄上具有可比性。所有患者均采用金属聚乙烯关节加压固定植入假体内构件。对THA术后3、6个月、1、3年的并发症发生率和功能结果进行评估。结果:在我们的研究中,人工髋关节置换术后3年内的成活率为100%。两组均未发生假体周围骨折、假体周围感染和假体内构件无菌性不稳定。OFH组1例(2.9%)、OA组1例(2.5%)出现术后创面炎症。1例OFH患者发生假体脱位;在OA组中没有这样的发现。OA患者种植体周围骨溶解的频率(2.5%)比OFH组(5.8%)低两倍。两组患者手术前后功能结果动态差异无统计学意义(Harris评分)。OFH患者Harris评分平均为63分,3年后达到94分;OA组分别为58和94。结论:THA是治疗严重髋关节置换术的一种替代方法。在OFH和OA患者中,使用金属聚乙烯关节的无骨水泥假体显示出高疗效和低并发症。我们发现,在OFH和OA患者的生存、术后并发症和功能结局方面,THA结果没有显著差异。较长的术后随访是可取的,这可能使我们能够确定治疗结果的一些差异。
Total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of severe stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head and osteoarthritis: results and complications
BACKGROUND: Nowadays total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the method of choice for the treatment of late stages osteonecrosis of the femoral head (OFH) and osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip joint.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and complication pattern of THA in late stages of OFH and OA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 74 patients who underwent primary THA for OA stages IIIIV (Kellgren and Lawrence classification) and for OFH stages IIIIV (ARCO classification). Group 1 included 34 patients with OFH stages IIIIV, and group 2 40 patients with OA stages IIIIV. The groups were comparable by gender and age. All patients underwent implantation of endoprosthesis components using press-fit fixation with a metalpolyethylene articulation. Treatment results were assessed with regard to the incidence of complications and functional results at 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after THA.
RESULTS: In our study, the survival rate of components after THA within 3 years after implantation was 100%. No cases of periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic infection, and aseptic instability of endoprosthesis components were observed in both groups. The surface inflammation of the postoperative wound was detected in 1 (2.9%) patient in the OFH group and in 1 (2.5%) patient in OA group. Dislocation of the endoprosthesis occurred in 1 patient with OFH; there were no such findings in the OA group. The frequency of peri-implant osteolysis was twice lower (2.5%) in patients with OA compared to OFH group (5.8%). There were no statistically significant differences in the functional results dynamics before and after surgery between the groups (Harris score). The average Harris scale score in patients with OFH was 63 and reached 94 after 3 years; in OA group 58 and 94, respectively.
CONCLUSION: THA is an alternative method in the treatment of severe hip arthroplasty. Endoprosthetics using a cementless endoprosthesis with a metalpolyethylene articulation demonstrated high efficacy as well as a low number of complications among patients with OFH and OA. We found no significant difference in THA results in terms of survival, postoperative complications, and functional outcome in patients with OFH and OA. Longer postoperative follow-up is advisable, which may allow us to establish some differences in treatment outcomes.