从文档中提取信息:问题回答与令牌分类在现实世界的设置

Laurent Lam, Pirashanth Ratnamogan, Joel Tang, William Vanhuffel, Fabien Caspani
{"title":"从文档中提取信息:问题回答与令牌分类在现实世界的设置","authors":"Laurent Lam, Pirashanth Ratnamogan, Joel Tang, William Vanhuffel, Fabien Caspani","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2304.10994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research in Document Intelligence and especially in Document Key Information Extraction (DocKIE) has been mainly solved as Token Classification problem. Recent breakthroughs in both natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision helped building document-focused pre-training methods, leveraging a multimodal understanding of the document text, layout and image modalities. However, these breakthroughs also led to the emergence of a new DocKIE subtask of extractive document Question Answering (DocQA), as part of the Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) research field. In this work, we compare the Question Answering approach with the classical token classification approach for document key information extraction. We designed experiments to benchmark five different experimental setups : raw performances, robustness to noisy environment, capacity to extract long entities, fine-tuning speed on Few-Shot Learning and finally Zero-Shot Learning. Our research showed that when dealing with clean and relatively short entities, it is still best to use token classification-based approach, while the QA approach could be a good alternative for noisy environment or long entities use-cases.","PeriodicalId":294655,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition","volume":"102 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Extraction from Documents: Question Answering vs Token Classification in real-world setups\",\"authors\":\"Laurent Lam, Pirashanth Ratnamogan, Joel Tang, William Vanhuffel, Fabien Caspani\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2304.10994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research in Document Intelligence and especially in Document Key Information Extraction (DocKIE) has been mainly solved as Token Classification problem. Recent breakthroughs in both natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision helped building document-focused pre-training methods, leveraging a multimodal understanding of the document text, layout and image modalities. However, these breakthroughs also led to the emergence of a new DocKIE subtask of extractive document Question Answering (DocQA), as part of the Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) research field. In this work, we compare the Question Answering approach with the classical token classification approach for document key information extraction. We designed experiments to benchmark five different experimental setups : raw performances, robustness to noisy environment, capacity to extract long entities, fine-tuning speed on Few-Shot Learning and finally Zero-Shot Learning. Our research showed that when dealing with clean and relatively short entities, it is still best to use token classification-based approach, while the QA approach could be a good alternative for noisy environment or long entities use-cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.10994\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.10994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文档智能,特别是文档关键信息提取(DocKIE)的研究主要以令牌分类问题来解决。自然语言处理(NLP)和计算机视觉的最新突破有助于构建以文档为中心的预训练方法,利用对文档文本、布局和图像模式的多模态理解。然而,这些突破也导致了提取文档问答(DocQA)的一个新的DocKIE子任务的出现,作为机器阅读理解(MRC)研究领域的一部分。在这项工作中,我们将问答方法与经典的令牌分类方法进行了文档关键信息提取的比较。我们设计了五种不同的实验设置:原始性能、对噪声环境的鲁棒性、提取长实体的能力、Few-Shot学习的微调速度和最后的Zero-Shot学习。我们的研究表明,当处理干净和相对较短的实体时,仍然最好使用基于令牌分类的方法,而QA方法对于嘈杂的环境或较长的实体用例可能是一个很好的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information Extraction from Documents: Question Answering vs Token Classification in real-world setups
Research in Document Intelligence and especially in Document Key Information Extraction (DocKIE) has been mainly solved as Token Classification problem. Recent breakthroughs in both natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision helped building document-focused pre-training methods, leveraging a multimodal understanding of the document text, layout and image modalities. However, these breakthroughs also led to the emergence of a new DocKIE subtask of extractive document Question Answering (DocQA), as part of the Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) research field. In this work, we compare the Question Answering approach with the classical token classification approach for document key information extraction. We designed experiments to benchmark five different experimental setups : raw performances, robustness to noisy environment, capacity to extract long entities, fine-tuning speed on Few-Shot Learning and finally Zero-Shot Learning. Our research showed that when dealing with clean and relatively short entities, it is still best to use token classification-based approach, while the QA approach could be a good alternative for noisy environment or long entities use-cases.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信