2022年重新审视在线数据市场

Javen Kennedy, Pranav Subramaniam, Sainyam Galhotra, Raul Castro Fernandez
{"title":"2022年重新审视在线数据市场","authors":"Javen Kennedy, Pranav Subramaniam, Sainyam Galhotra, Raul Castro Fernandez","doi":"10.1145/3572751.3572757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Well-functioning data markets match sellers with buyers to allocate data effectively. Although most of today's data markets fall short of this ideal, there is a renewed interest in online data marketplaces that may fulfill the promise of data markets. In this paper, we survey participants of some of the most common data marketplaces to understand the platforms' upsides and downsides. We find that buyers and sellers spend the majority of their time and effort in price negotiations. Although the markets work as an effective storefront that lets buyers find useful data fast, the high transaction costs required to negotiate price and circumvent the information asymmetry that exists between buyers and sellers indicates that today's marketplaces are still far from offering an effective solution to data trading. We draw on the results of the interviews to present potential opportunities for improvement and future research.","PeriodicalId":346332,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGMOD Record","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting Online Data Markets in 2022\",\"authors\":\"Javen Kennedy, Pranav Subramaniam, Sainyam Galhotra, Raul Castro Fernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3572751.3572757\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Well-functioning data markets match sellers with buyers to allocate data effectively. Although most of today's data markets fall short of this ideal, there is a renewed interest in online data marketplaces that may fulfill the promise of data markets. In this paper, we survey participants of some of the most common data marketplaces to understand the platforms' upsides and downsides. We find that buyers and sellers spend the majority of their time and effort in price negotiations. Although the markets work as an effective storefront that lets buyers find useful data fast, the high transaction costs required to negotiate price and circumvent the information asymmetry that exists between buyers and sellers indicates that today's marketplaces are still far from offering an effective solution to data trading. We draw on the results of the interviews to present potential opportunities for improvement and future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGMOD Record\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGMOD Record\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3572751.3572757\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGMOD Record","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3572751.3572757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

运作良好的数据市场将卖家和买家匹配起来,有效地分配数据。尽管今天的大多数数据市场都达不到这一理想,但人们对在线数据市场重新产生了兴趣,这可能会实现数据市场的承诺。在本文中,我们调查了一些最常见的数据市场的参与者,以了解平台的优点和缺点。我们发现买卖双方把大部分时间和精力都花在价格谈判上。尽管市场是一个有效的店面,可以让买家快速找到有用的数据,但谈判价格和规避买家和卖家之间存在的信息不对称所需的高交易成本表明,今天的市场还远远不能为数据交易提供有效的解决方案。我们利用访谈的结果来提出改进和未来研究的潜在机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting Online Data Markets in 2022
Well-functioning data markets match sellers with buyers to allocate data effectively. Although most of today's data markets fall short of this ideal, there is a renewed interest in online data marketplaces that may fulfill the promise of data markets. In this paper, we survey participants of some of the most common data marketplaces to understand the platforms' upsides and downsides. We find that buyers and sellers spend the majority of their time and effort in price negotiations. Although the markets work as an effective storefront that lets buyers find useful data fast, the high transaction costs required to negotiate price and circumvent the information asymmetry that exists between buyers and sellers indicates that today's marketplaces are still far from offering an effective solution to data trading. We draw on the results of the interviews to present potential opportunities for improvement and future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信