中国学生对泰国大学老师的隐喻性描述

Prommin Songsirisak, Jutharat Jitpranee, Albert Lisec, Prasobkan Boonjanawiroj, Bhudtree Wetpichetkosol, Kannikar Kantamas
{"title":"中国学生对泰国大学老师的隐喻性描述","authors":"Prommin Songsirisak, Jutharat Jitpranee, Albert Lisec, Prasobkan Boonjanawiroj, Bhudtree Wetpichetkosol, Kannikar Kantamas","doi":"10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This paper discusses Chinese students’ negative and positive written feedback about Thai teachers using metaphorical descriptions and the links between it and their classroom experiences. \nMethodology – An open-response questionnaire was employed to collect the data from 21 Chinese female students. The questionnaire provided both positive and negative “people” or “thing” metaphors of Thai teachers for students’ selection. In addition, students were allowed to use their own metaphors to describe their teachers. Data was analyzed by using open and axial coding techniques. \nFindings – The results revealed that Chinese students were able to compare Thai teachers with either a “person” or “thing” metaphor and could write a metaphorical description that reflected different aspects of their instructors’ teaching, both positively and negatively. The quality of their descriptions was rich enough to link with their classroom learning experiences. Both positive and negative “people” and “thing” metaphorical descriptions were associated with three different viewpoints: academic, power dynamics, and emotion. The positive “people” metaphorical descriptions were linked to four classroom issues: knowledge and experience, teaching style, motivation, and guardian/protector. In contrast, the positive “thing” and negative “people” and “thing” metaphorical descriptions were linked to three classroom issues: knowledge and experience, teaching style, and emotion. \nSignificance – These findings help to strengthen Thai-Sino understanding of the relationship between Chinese students and Thai teachers. Findings also suggested that Chinese students’ metaphorical feedback should be used with the non-metaphorical assessment form to evaluate and improve Thai teachers’ instructional practices in the Thai-Chinese student exchange curriculum.","PeriodicalId":375345,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHINESE STUDENTS’ METAPHORICAL DESCRIPTIONS OF THAI TEACHERS AT A THAI UNIVERSITY\",\"authors\":\"Prommin Songsirisak, Jutharat Jitpranee, Albert Lisec, Prasobkan Boonjanawiroj, Bhudtree Wetpichetkosol, Kannikar Kantamas\",\"doi\":\"10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – This paper discusses Chinese students’ negative and positive written feedback about Thai teachers using metaphorical descriptions and the links between it and their classroom experiences. \\nMethodology – An open-response questionnaire was employed to collect the data from 21 Chinese female students. The questionnaire provided both positive and negative “people” or “thing” metaphors of Thai teachers for students’ selection. In addition, students were allowed to use their own metaphors to describe their teachers. Data was analyzed by using open and axial coding techniques. \\nFindings – The results revealed that Chinese students were able to compare Thai teachers with either a “person” or “thing” metaphor and could write a metaphorical description that reflected different aspects of their instructors’ teaching, both positively and negatively. The quality of their descriptions was rich enough to link with their classroom learning experiences. Both positive and negative “people” and “thing” metaphorical descriptions were associated with three different viewpoints: academic, power dynamics, and emotion. The positive “people” metaphorical descriptions were linked to four classroom issues: knowledge and experience, teaching style, motivation, and guardian/protector. In contrast, the positive “thing” and negative “people” and “thing” metaphorical descriptions were linked to three classroom issues: knowledge and experience, teaching style, and emotion. \\nSignificance – These findings help to strengthen Thai-Sino understanding of the relationship between Chinese students and Thai teachers. Findings also suggested that Chinese students’ metaphorical feedback should be used with the non-metaphorical assessment form to evaluate and improve Thai teachers’ instructional practices in the Thai-Chinese student exchange curriculum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文探讨了中国学生对泰国教师的消极和积极的书面反馈,使用隐喻描述,以及它与他们的课堂体验之间的联系。研究方法:采用开放式问卷调查法,对21名中国女学生进行问卷调查。问卷提供了泰国教师积极和消极的“人”或“物”隐喻供学生选择。此外,学生们被允许用自己的隐喻来描述他们的老师。数据分析采用开放和轴向编码技术。结果显示,中国学生能够用“人”或“物”比喻来比较泰国老师,并能写出反映教师教学不同方面的隐喻描述,包括积极和消极的方面。他们的描述质量丰富,足以与他们的课堂学习经历联系起来。积极和消极的“人”和“物”隐喻描述都与三种不同的观点有关:学术、权力动力学和情感。积极的“人”隐喻描述与四个课堂问题有关:知识和经验、教学风格、动机和监护人/保护者。相比之下,积极的“物”和消极的“人”和“物”隐喻描述与三个课堂问题有关:知识和经验、教学风格和情感。意义:这些发现有助于加强泰中对中国学生和泰国教师之间关系的理解。研究结果还表明,应将中国学生的隐喻性反馈与非隐喻性评价表结合起来,对泰方教师在泰中学生交流课程中的教学实践进行评价和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CHINESE STUDENTS’ METAPHORICAL DESCRIPTIONS OF THAI TEACHERS AT A THAI UNIVERSITY
Purpose – This paper discusses Chinese students’ negative and positive written feedback about Thai teachers using metaphorical descriptions and the links between it and their classroom experiences. Methodology – An open-response questionnaire was employed to collect the data from 21 Chinese female students. The questionnaire provided both positive and negative “people” or “thing” metaphors of Thai teachers for students’ selection. In addition, students were allowed to use their own metaphors to describe their teachers. Data was analyzed by using open and axial coding techniques. Findings – The results revealed that Chinese students were able to compare Thai teachers with either a “person” or “thing” metaphor and could write a metaphorical description that reflected different aspects of their instructors’ teaching, both positively and negatively. The quality of their descriptions was rich enough to link with their classroom learning experiences. Both positive and negative “people” and “thing” metaphorical descriptions were associated with three different viewpoints: academic, power dynamics, and emotion. The positive “people” metaphorical descriptions were linked to four classroom issues: knowledge and experience, teaching style, motivation, and guardian/protector. In contrast, the positive “thing” and negative “people” and “thing” metaphorical descriptions were linked to three classroom issues: knowledge and experience, teaching style, and emotion. Significance – These findings help to strengthen Thai-Sino understanding of the relationship between Chinese students and Thai teachers. Findings also suggested that Chinese students’ metaphorical feedback should be used with the non-metaphorical assessment form to evaluate and improve Thai teachers’ instructional practices in the Thai-Chinese student exchange curriculum.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信