验证、认可或认证:一种提供信心的新型图表

Thomas Polacsek
{"title":"验证、认可或认证:一种提供信心的新型图表","authors":"Thomas Polacsek","doi":"10.1109/RCIS.2016.7549297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the argumentation diagram is to organize and visualize, in a synthetic way, all key elements proving the validity of a product's property. The argumentation diagram does not represent the process, but gives the rationale behind all Verification & Validation (V&V) documents. In fact, it lists and organizes necessary evidence in a development life cycle. But the validity of the final assessment requires the validation and the identification of the evidence of each intermediate step. So, in this article, we introduce a generic argumentation pattern and its derivations, whose support a rational organization of all V&V evidence at each step. This pattern stems from legal science and argumentation theory legacies, and it is the basic building block for the argumentation diagram construction.","PeriodicalId":344289,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation, accreditation or certification: A new kind of diagram to provide confidence\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Polacsek\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RCIS.2016.7549297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the argumentation diagram is to organize and visualize, in a synthetic way, all key elements proving the validity of a product's property. The argumentation diagram does not represent the process, but gives the rationale behind all Verification & Validation (V&V) documents. In fact, it lists and organizes necessary evidence in a development life cycle. But the validity of the final assessment requires the validation and the identification of the evidence of each intermediate step. So, in this article, we introduce a generic argumentation pattern and its derivations, whose support a rational organization of all V&V evidence at each step. This pattern stems from legal science and argumentation theory legacies, and it is the basic building block for the argumentation diagram construction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2016.7549297\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2016.7549297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

论证图的目的是以综合的方式组织和可视化证明产品属性有效性的所有关键要素。论证图并不表示过程,但是给出了所有验证和确认(V&V)文档背后的基本原理。实际上,它列出并组织了开发生命周期中必要的证据。但最终评估的有效性需要对每个中间步骤的证据进行验证和识别。因此,在本文中,我们介绍了一个通用的论证模式及其推导,它支持在每个步骤中合理地组织所有的V&V证据。这一模式源于法学和论证理论的遗产,是构建论证图的基本构件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation, accreditation or certification: A new kind of diagram to provide confidence
The aim of the argumentation diagram is to organize and visualize, in a synthetic way, all key elements proving the validity of a product's property. The argumentation diagram does not represent the process, but gives the rationale behind all Verification & Validation (V&V) documents. In fact, it lists and organizes necessary evidence in a development life cycle. But the validity of the final assessment requires the validation and the identification of the evidence of each intermediate step. So, in this article, we introduce a generic argumentation pattern and its derivations, whose support a rational organization of all V&V evidence at each step. This pattern stems from legal science and argumentation theory legacies, and it is the basic building block for the argumentation diagram construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信