肯尼亚社会、经济和文化权利的司法执行:卫生和住房

Silas Aluku
{"title":"肯尼亚社会、经济和文化权利的司法执行:卫生和住房","authors":"Silas Aluku","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2660810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The place of human rights in evaluating the level of civilization of a society cannot be overstated. Modern constitutional-making processes endeavor to entrench progressive bills of rights in their architecture. General recognition of human rights in constitutional documents has become the bromide of constitutional law since after WWII. Constitutional designs have therefore shifted from giving prominence to civil and political rights, to the global recognition of social, economic and cultural rights (\"SER's\") as well. Undoubtedly, recognition of SERs has given rise to the debate whether SERs are legally binding constitutional provisions or mere political aspirations to be achieved overtime. As a result, the question of whether they are justiciable has emerged. This paper tries to answer this philosophical hypothesis by exploring judicial enforcement of SERs in Kenya and the effect entrenched SERs have in a constitutional dispensation they obtain.","PeriodicalId":169556,"journal":{"name":"Culture Area Studies eJournal","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial Enforcement of Social Economic and Cultural Rights in Kenya: Health and Housing\",\"authors\":\"Silas Aluku\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2660810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The place of human rights in evaluating the level of civilization of a society cannot be overstated. Modern constitutional-making processes endeavor to entrench progressive bills of rights in their architecture. General recognition of human rights in constitutional documents has become the bromide of constitutional law since after WWII. Constitutional designs have therefore shifted from giving prominence to civil and political rights, to the global recognition of social, economic and cultural rights (\\\"SER's\\\") as well. Undoubtedly, recognition of SERs has given rise to the debate whether SERs are legally binding constitutional provisions or mere political aspirations to be achieved overtime. As a result, the question of whether they are justiciable has emerged. This paper tries to answer this philosophical hypothesis by exploring judicial enforcement of SERs in Kenya and the effect entrenched SERs have in a constitutional dispensation they obtain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture Area Studies eJournal\",\"volume\":\"161 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture Area Studies eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2660810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture Area Studies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2660810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人权在评价一个社会的文明程度方面的地位怎么强调都不为过。现代制宪过程努力在其架构中确立进步的权利法案。二战后,宪法文件对人权的普遍承认成为宪法的定语。因此,宪法设计已从突出公民和政治权利转向全球承认社会、经济和文化权利。毫无疑问,对SERs的承认引发了关于SERs是具有法律约束力的宪法条款还是仅仅是需要长期实现的政治愿望的争论。因此,他们是否可以被审判的问题就出现了。本文试图通过探讨肯尼亚SERs的司法执行以及根深蒂固的SERs在他们获得的宪法豁免中的作用来回答这一哲学假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Judicial Enforcement of Social Economic and Cultural Rights in Kenya: Health and Housing
The place of human rights in evaluating the level of civilization of a society cannot be overstated. Modern constitutional-making processes endeavor to entrench progressive bills of rights in their architecture. General recognition of human rights in constitutional documents has become the bromide of constitutional law since after WWII. Constitutional designs have therefore shifted from giving prominence to civil and political rights, to the global recognition of social, economic and cultural rights ("SER's") as well. Undoubtedly, recognition of SERs has given rise to the debate whether SERs are legally binding constitutional provisions or mere political aspirations to be achieved overtime. As a result, the question of whether they are justiciable has emerged. This paper tries to answer this philosophical hypothesis by exploring judicial enforcement of SERs in Kenya and the effect entrenched SERs have in a constitutional dispensation they obtain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信