Facebook与NLRB会面:员工在线交流和不公平劳动行为

R. Sprague
{"title":"Facebook与NLRB会面:员工在线交流和不公平劳动行为","authors":"R. Sprague","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1982717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past eighteen months, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has received approximately one hundred charges from employees that were disciplined or fired as a result of their work-related online communications, principally through Facebook. These and other charges have resulted in twenty-one NLRB Office of the General Counsel Advice Memoranda, ten General Counsel reviews, four Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) decisions, and one Board decision, all addressing employee use of social media. This Article is the first to examine in detail those employee charges and the thirty-six incidents addressed by the Office of the General Counsel, the ALJs, and the Board. This Article’s analysis reveals that, based on these charges and incidents, most employees are not engaging online in concerted activities protected by the National Labor Relations Act. Rather, for the most part, they are griping about work and getting fired for it. However, these charges and incidents have raised concerns over the enforcement of overly broad social media policies by employers. Most importantly, the nature of social media technologies raises new issues of unlawful employer surveillance that have yet to be directly addressed by the NLRB. These three issues are examined through this article: determining when employee online communications are protected concerted activity, determining what constitutes an acceptable social media policy, and determining when an employer might engage in unlawful online surveillance.","PeriodicalId":219760,"journal":{"name":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facebook Meets the NLRB: Employee Online Communications and Unfair Labor Practices\",\"authors\":\"R. Sprague\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1982717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the past eighteen months, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has received approximately one hundred charges from employees that were disciplined or fired as a result of their work-related online communications, principally through Facebook. These and other charges have resulted in twenty-one NLRB Office of the General Counsel Advice Memoranda, ten General Counsel reviews, four Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) decisions, and one Board decision, all addressing employee use of social media. This Article is the first to examine in detail those employee charges and the thirty-six incidents addressed by the Office of the General Counsel, the ALJs, and the Board. This Article’s analysis reveals that, based on these charges and incidents, most employees are not engaging online in concerted activities protected by the National Labor Relations Act. Rather, for the most part, they are griping about work and getting fired for it. However, these charges and incidents have raised concerns over the enforcement of overly broad social media policies by employers. Most importantly, the nature of social media technologies raises new issues of unlawful employer surveillance that have yet to be directly addressed by the NLRB. These three issues are examined through this article: determining when employee online communications are protected concerted activity, determining what constitutes an acceptable social media policy, and determining when an employer might engage in unlawful online surveillance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1982717\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1982717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在过去的18个月里,国家劳工关系委员会(“NLRB”)收到了大约100份来自员工的指控,这些指控是由于他们主要通过Facebook进行与工作有关的在线交流而受到纪律处分或解雇的。这些和其他指控导致了21项NLRB总法律顾问办公室建议备忘录,10项总法律顾问审查,4项行政法法官(“ALJ”)决定和一项董事会决定,所有这些决定都涉及员工使用社交媒体。本文是第一个详细审查这些员工指控以及总法律顾问办公室、司法部长和董事会处理的36起事件的文章。本文的分析表明,基于这些指控和事件,大多数员工并没有在网上参与受《国家劳动关系法》保护的协同活动。相反,在大多数情况下,他们都在抱怨工作,并因此被解雇。然而,这些指控和事件引发了人们对雇主执行过于宽泛的社交媒体政策的担忧。最重要的是,社交媒体技术的性质引发了非法监视雇主的新问题,这一问题尚未由NLRB直接解决。本文考察了这三个问题:确定员工在线通信何时受到协同活动的保护,确定什么构成可接受的社交媒体政策,以及确定雇主何时可能从事非法在线监视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Facebook Meets the NLRB: Employee Online Communications and Unfair Labor Practices
In the past eighteen months, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) has received approximately one hundred charges from employees that were disciplined or fired as a result of their work-related online communications, principally through Facebook. These and other charges have resulted in twenty-one NLRB Office of the General Counsel Advice Memoranda, ten General Counsel reviews, four Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) decisions, and one Board decision, all addressing employee use of social media. This Article is the first to examine in detail those employee charges and the thirty-six incidents addressed by the Office of the General Counsel, the ALJs, and the Board. This Article’s analysis reveals that, based on these charges and incidents, most employees are not engaging online in concerted activities protected by the National Labor Relations Act. Rather, for the most part, they are griping about work and getting fired for it. However, these charges and incidents have raised concerns over the enforcement of overly broad social media policies by employers. Most importantly, the nature of social media technologies raises new issues of unlawful employer surveillance that have yet to be directly addressed by the NLRB. These three issues are examined through this article: determining when employee online communications are protected concerted activity, determining what constitutes an acceptable social media policy, and determining when an employer might engage in unlawful online surveillance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信