干扰素诱导介质与疑似COVID-19危重患者的SARS-CoV-2及其相关严重程度相关

E. Morrell, P. Bhatraju, N. Sathe, J. Lawson, A. Wiedeman, C. Vega, T. Liu, Xin-Ya Chai, S. Sahi, C. Brager, M. Orlov, S. Sakr, A. Sader, D. Lum, N. Koetje, A. Garay, E. Barnes, G. Cromer, M. Bray, S. Pipavath, S. Fink, Laura E. Evans, A. Long, T. West, M. Wurfel, C. Mikacenic
{"title":"干扰素诱导介质与疑似COVID-19危重患者的SARS-CoV-2及其相关严重程度相关","authors":"E. Morrell, P. Bhatraju, N. Sathe, J. Lawson, A. Wiedeman, C. Vega, T. Liu, Xin-Ya Chai, S. Sahi, C. Brager, M. Orlov, S. Sakr, A. Sader, D. Lum, N. Koetje, A. Garay, E. Barnes, G. Cromer, M. Bray, S. Pipavath, S. Fink, Laura E. Evans, A. Long, T. West, M. Wurfel, C. Mikacenic","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A1294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE: Several studies have identified host immune signatures that are associated with COVID-19. However, it is unclear whether these immune signatures are specific to COVID-19 or are merely reflective of illness severity. In vitro studies have demonstrated that human T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2-specific antigens are mediated through interferon-gamma (IFN-γ). Methods: We prospectively enrolled a multi-site cohort of patients admitted to the ICU under suspicion for COVID-19 who were then determined to be SARS-CoV-2-positive (n = 82) or-negative (n = 97) by RT-PCR. We measured multiple molecular and cellular immune profiles from blood and endotracheal aspirates (ETAs) collected on ICU admission. Our primary analysis tested for associations between IFN-γ and interferon-inducible mediators (CXCL10 and soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1)) in blood or ETAs and SARS-CoV-2 status. We then stratified our cohort into SARS-CoV-2-negative and-positive groups and tested for associations between interferon-inducible mediators and clinical outcomes and SARS-CoV-2-copy-number. We used cytometry time-of-flight (CyTOF) to simultaneously measure 39 cell surface and intracellular markers on peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from a subset of patients with ARDS. We then compared immune cell signatures in subjects with vs. without SARS-CoV-2. Results: The mean APACHE III score was higher in SARS-CoV-2-negative vs.-positive subjects (80±30 vs. 69±29), but the groups were otherwise well-matched. SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects had higher plasma concentrations of IFN-γ, CXCL10, and sPD-L1 relative to SARSCoV-2-negative patients adjusting for age, sex, and severity of illness (all p ≤ 0.01). The levels of IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8, MCP-1, and IL-17A were not significantly different between the two groups. SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects also had higher CXCL10 concentrations in ETAs than SARS-CoV-2-negative subjects. Higher plasma concentrations of CXCL10 and sPD-L1 were associated with higher mortality (Table 1) and more severe respiratory disease (ventilator-free days (VFDs), ARDS) in SARS-CoV-2-positive, but not-negative, patients. In contrast, higher IL-6 was associated with a lower number of VFDs and ARDS in both groups. IFN-γ and CXCL10 (but not IL-6) were associated with SARS-CoV-2-copy-number. Using CyTOF, we found SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects had a lower proportion of CXCR3+ (CXCL10 receptor) T-cells, a higher proportion of PD-L1+ monocytes, and less T-cell and monocyte intracellular cytokine staining vs. SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. Conclusion: Our findings suggest interferon-inducible mediator responses and immune cell hypofunction are characteristic of critically ill subjects with SARS-CoV-2 compared with similar patients without SARS-CoV-2. Our identification of immune signatures that are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection but are distinct from other forms of critical illness clarifies COVID-19 pathophysiology.","PeriodicalId":320542,"journal":{"name":"TP3. TP003 COVID-19 INFECTIONS, MECHANISMS, AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interferon-Inducible Mediators Are Associated with SARS-CoV-2 and Related Severity Amongst Critically Ill Patients Suspected of COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"E. Morrell, P. Bhatraju, N. Sathe, J. Lawson, A. Wiedeman, C. Vega, T. Liu, Xin-Ya Chai, S. Sahi, C. Brager, M. Orlov, S. Sakr, A. Sader, D. Lum, N. Koetje, A. Garay, E. Barnes, G. Cromer, M. Bray, S. Pipavath, S. Fink, Laura E. Evans, A. Long, T. West, M. Wurfel, C. Mikacenic\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A1294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"RATIONALE: Several studies have identified host immune signatures that are associated with COVID-19. However, it is unclear whether these immune signatures are specific to COVID-19 or are merely reflective of illness severity. In vitro studies have demonstrated that human T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2-specific antigens are mediated through interferon-gamma (IFN-γ). Methods: We prospectively enrolled a multi-site cohort of patients admitted to the ICU under suspicion for COVID-19 who were then determined to be SARS-CoV-2-positive (n = 82) or-negative (n = 97) by RT-PCR. We measured multiple molecular and cellular immune profiles from blood and endotracheal aspirates (ETAs) collected on ICU admission. Our primary analysis tested for associations between IFN-γ and interferon-inducible mediators (CXCL10 and soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1)) in blood or ETAs and SARS-CoV-2 status. We then stratified our cohort into SARS-CoV-2-negative and-positive groups and tested for associations between interferon-inducible mediators and clinical outcomes and SARS-CoV-2-copy-number. We used cytometry time-of-flight (CyTOF) to simultaneously measure 39 cell surface and intracellular markers on peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from a subset of patients with ARDS. We then compared immune cell signatures in subjects with vs. without SARS-CoV-2. Results: The mean APACHE III score was higher in SARS-CoV-2-negative vs.-positive subjects (80±30 vs. 69±29), but the groups were otherwise well-matched. SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects had higher plasma concentrations of IFN-γ, CXCL10, and sPD-L1 relative to SARSCoV-2-negative patients adjusting for age, sex, and severity of illness (all p ≤ 0.01). The levels of IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8, MCP-1, and IL-17A were not significantly different between the two groups. SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects also had higher CXCL10 concentrations in ETAs than SARS-CoV-2-negative subjects. Higher plasma concentrations of CXCL10 and sPD-L1 were associated with higher mortality (Table 1) and more severe respiratory disease (ventilator-free days (VFDs), ARDS) in SARS-CoV-2-positive, but not-negative, patients. In contrast, higher IL-6 was associated with a lower number of VFDs and ARDS in both groups. IFN-γ and CXCL10 (but not IL-6) were associated with SARS-CoV-2-copy-number. Using CyTOF, we found SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects had a lower proportion of CXCR3+ (CXCL10 receptor) T-cells, a higher proportion of PD-L1+ monocytes, and less T-cell and monocyte intracellular cytokine staining vs. SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. Conclusion: Our findings suggest interferon-inducible mediator responses and immune cell hypofunction are characteristic of critically ill subjects with SARS-CoV-2 compared with similar patients without SARS-CoV-2. Our identification of immune signatures that are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection but are distinct from other forms of critical illness clarifies COVID-19 pathophysiology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TP3. TP003 COVID-19 INFECTIONS, MECHANISMS, AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TP3. TP003 COVID-19 INFECTIONS, MECHANISMS, AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A1294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP3. TP003 COVID-19 INFECTIONS, MECHANISMS, AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A1294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:几项研究已经确定了与COVID-19相关的宿主免疫特征。然而,目前尚不清楚这些免疫特征是针对COVID-19特异性的,还是仅仅反映了疾病的严重程度。体外研究表明,人t细胞对sars - cov -2特异性抗原的反应是通过干扰素-γ介导的。方法:我们前瞻性地纳入了一组疑似COVID-19入住ICU的患者,然后通过RT-PCR确定其为sars - cov -2阳性(n = 82)或阴性(n = 97)。我们从ICU入院时收集的血液和气管内吸入物(ETAs)中测量了多种分子和细胞免疫谱。我们的主要分析测试了血液或ETAs中IFN-γ和干扰素诱导介质(CXCL10和可溶性PD-L1 (sPD-L1))与SARS-CoV-2状态之间的关联。然后,我们将我们的队列分层为sars - cov -2阴性和阳性组,并检测干扰素诱导介质与临床结果和sars - cov -2拷贝数之间的关系。我们使用细胞术飞行时间(CyTOF)同时测量了39种细胞表面和细胞内标记物,这些标记物来自于ARDS患者的外周血单个核细胞。然后,我们比较了感染SARS-CoV-2和未感染SARS-CoV-2受试者的免疫细胞特征。结果:sars - cov -2阴性组的平均APACHE III评分高于阳性组(80±30比69±29),但两组在其他方面匹配良好。经年龄、性别和病情严重程度调整后,sars - cov -2阳性受试者血浆中IFN-γ、CXCL10和sPD-L1浓度高于sarscov -2阴性患者(均p≤0.01)。两组患者IL-6、TNF-α、IL-8、MCP-1、IL-17A水平差异无统计学意义。sars - cov -2阳性受试者的ETAs中CXCL10浓度也高于sars - cov -2阴性受试者。在sars - cov -2阳性但非阴性的患者中,较高的血浆CXCL10和sPD-L1浓度与较高的死亡率(表1)和更严重的呼吸系统疾病(无呼吸机天数(vfd), ARDS)相关。相比之下,两组患者IL-6升高与vfd和ARDS发生率降低相关。IFN-γ和CXCL10(但不包括IL-6)与sars - cov -2拷贝数相关。使用CyTOF,我们发现与sars - cov -2阴性患者相比,sars - cov -2阳性受试者的CXCR3+ (CXCL10受体)t细胞比例较低,PD-L1+单核细胞比例较高,t细胞和单核细胞胞内细胞因子染色较少。结论:与未感染SARS-CoV-2的类似患者相比,干扰素诱导的介质反应和免疫细胞功能低下是SARS-CoV-2危重患者的特征。我们对与SARS-CoV-2感染相关但与其他形式的危重疾病不同的免疫特征的鉴定澄清了COVID-19的病理生理学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interferon-Inducible Mediators Are Associated with SARS-CoV-2 and Related Severity Amongst Critically Ill Patients Suspected of COVID-19
RATIONALE: Several studies have identified host immune signatures that are associated with COVID-19. However, it is unclear whether these immune signatures are specific to COVID-19 or are merely reflective of illness severity. In vitro studies have demonstrated that human T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2-specific antigens are mediated through interferon-gamma (IFN-γ). Methods: We prospectively enrolled a multi-site cohort of patients admitted to the ICU under suspicion for COVID-19 who were then determined to be SARS-CoV-2-positive (n = 82) or-negative (n = 97) by RT-PCR. We measured multiple molecular and cellular immune profiles from blood and endotracheal aspirates (ETAs) collected on ICU admission. Our primary analysis tested for associations between IFN-γ and interferon-inducible mediators (CXCL10 and soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1)) in blood or ETAs and SARS-CoV-2 status. We then stratified our cohort into SARS-CoV-2-negative and-positive groups and tested for associations between interferon-inducible mediators and clinical outcomes and SARS-CoV-2-copy-number. We used cytometry time-of-flight (CyTOF) to simultaneously measure 39 cell surface and intracellular markers on peripheral blood mononuclear cells collected from a subset of patients with ARDS. We then compared immune cell signatures in subjects with vs. without SARS-CoV-2. Results: The mean APACHE III score was higher in SARS-CoV-2-negative vs.-positive subjects (80±30 vs. 69±29), but the groups were otherwise well-matched. SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects had higher plasma concentrations of IFN-γ, CXCL10, and sPD-L1 relative to SARSCoV-2-negative patients adjusting for age, sex, and severity of illness (all p ≤ 0.01). The levels of IL-6, TNF-α, IL-8, MCP-1, and IL-17A were not significantly different between the two groups. SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects also had higher CXCL10 concentrations in ETAs than SARS-CoV-2-negative subjects. Higher plasma concentrations of CXCL10 and sPD-L1 were associated with higher mortality (Table 1) and more severe respiratory disease (ventilator-free days (VFDs), ARDS) in SARS-CoV-2-positive, but not-negative, patients. In contrast, higher IL-6 was associated with a lower number of VFDs and ARDS in both groups. IFN-γ and CXCL10 (but not IL-6) were associated with SARS-CoV-2-copy-number. Using CyTOF, we found SARS-CoV-2-positive subjects had a lower proportion of CXCR3+ (CXCL10 receptor) T-cells, a higher proportion of PD-L1+ monocytes, and less T-cell and monocyte intracellular cytokine staining vs. SARS-CoV-2-negative patients. Conclusion: Our findings suggest interferon-inducible mediator responses and immune cell hypofunction are characteristic of critically ill subjects with SARS-CoV-2 compared with similar patients without SARS-CoV-2. Our identification of immune signatures that are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection but are distinct from other forms of critical illness clarifies COVID-19 pathophysiology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信