选择正确的手机应用范例

N. P. Huy, D. Thanh
{"title":"选择正确的手机应用范例","authors":"N. P. Huy, D. Thanh","doi":"10.1109/SOCA.2012.6449450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The explosion of mobile applications both in number and variety raises the need of shedding light on their architecture, composition and quality. Indeed, it is crucial to understand which mobile application paradigm fits better to what type of application and usage. Such understanding has direct consequences on the user experience, the development cost and sale revenues of mobile apps. In this paper, we identified four main mobile application paradigms and evaluated them from the developer, user and service provider viewpoints. To ensure objectivity and soundness we start by defining high level criteria and then breaking down in finer-grained criteria. After a theoretical evaluation an implementation was carried out as a practical verification. The selected application is object recognition app, which is both exciting and challenging to develop.","PeriodicalId":298564,"journal":{"name":"2012 Fifth IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selecting the right mobile app paradigms\",\"authors\":\"N. P. Huy, D. Thanh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SOCA.2012.6449450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The explosion of mobile applications both in number and variety raises the need of shedding light on their architecture, composition and quality. Indeed, it is crucial to understand which mobile application paradigm fits better to what type of application and usage. Such understanding has direct consequences on the user experience, the development cost and sale revenues of mobile apps. In this paper, we identified four main mobile application paradigms and evaluated them from the developer, user and service provider viewpoints. To ensure objectivity and soundness we start by defining high level criteria and then breaking down in finer-grained criteria. After a theoretical evaluation an implementation was carried out as a practical verification. The selected application is object recognition app, which is both exciting and challenging to develop.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298564,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Fifth IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Fifth IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOCA.2012.6449450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Fifth IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SOCA.2012.6449450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

随着移动应用在数量和种类上的爆炸式增长,我们需要了解它们的架构、组成和质量。事实上,了解哪种移动应用程序范例更适合哪种类型的应用程序和使用是至关重要的。这种理解对用户体验、开发成本和手机应用的销售收入有直接影响。在本文中,我们确定了四种主要的移动应用范例,并从开发者、用户和服务提供商的角度对它们进行了评估。为了确保客观性和可靠性,我们首先定义高层次的标准,然后分解成更细粒度的标准。在进行理论评价后,进行了实施,并进行了实际验证。所选择的应用程序是对象识别应用程序,这是既令人兴奋又具有挑战性的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selecting the right mobile app paradigms
The explosion of mobile applications both in number and variety raises the need of shedding light on their architecture, composition and quality. Indeed, it is crucial to understand which mobile application paradigm fits better to what type of application and usage. Such understanding has direct consequences on the user experience, the development cost and sale revenues of mobile apps. In this paper, we identified four main mobile application paradigms and evaluated them from the developer, user and service provider viewpoints. To ensure objectivity and soundness we start by defining high level criteria and then breaking down in finer-grained criteria. After a theoretical evaluation an implementation was carried out as a practical verification. The selected application is object recognition app, which is both exciting and challenging to develop.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信