字节me:流量分类中字节准确性的一个案例

Jeffrey Erman, A. Mahanti, M. Arlitt
{"title":"字节me:流量分类中字节准确性的一个案例","authors":"Jeffrey Erman, A. Mahanti, M. Arlitt","doi":"10.1145/1269880.1269890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous network traffic classification approaches have recently been proposed. In general, these approaches have focused on correctly identifying a high percentage of total flows. However, on the Internet a small number of \"elephant\" flows contribute a significant amount of the traffic volume. In addition, some application types like Peer-to-Peer (P2P) and FTP contribute more elephant flows than other applications types like Chat. In this opinion piece, we discuss how evaluating a classifier on flow accuracy alone can bias the classification results. By not giving special attention to these traffic classes and their elephant flows in the evaluation of traffic classification approaches we might obtain significantly different performance when these approaches are deployed in operational networks for typical traffic classification tasks such as traffic shaping. We argue that byte accuracy must also be used when evaluating the accuracy of traffic classification algorithms.","PeriodicalId":216113,"journal":{"name":"Annual ACM Workshop on Mining Network Data","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Byte me: a case for byte accuracy in traffic classification\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Erman, A. Mahanti, M. Arlitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1269880.1269890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Numerous network traffic classification approaches have recently been proposed. In general, these approaches have focused on correctly identifying a high percentage of total flows. However, on the Internet a small number of \\\"elephant\\\" flows contribute a significant amount of the traffic volume. In addition, some application types like Peer-to-Peer (P2P) and FTP contribute more elephant flows than other applications types like Chat. In this opinion piece, we discuss how evaluating a classifier on flow accuracy alone can bias the classification results. By not giving special attention to these traffic classes and their elephant flows in the evaluation of traffic classification approaches we might obtain significantly different performance when these approaches are deployed in operational networks for typical traffic classification tasks such as traffic shaping. We argue that byte accuracy must also be used when evaluating the accuracy of traffic classification algorithms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":216113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual ACM Workshop on Mining Network Data\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual ACM Workshop on Mining Network Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1269880.1269890\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual ACM Workshop on Mining Network Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1269880.1269890","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

摘要

最近提出了许多网络流分类方法。一般来说,这些方法的重点是正确识别总流量的高比例。然而,在互联网上,少数“大象”流贡献了大量的流量。此外,一些应用程序类型(如P2P)和FTP比其他应用程序类型(如Chat)提供更多的大象流。在这篇观点文章中,我们讨论了如何仅根据流量准确性评估分类器会对分类结果产生偏差。如果在流量分类方法的评估中不特别关注这些流量类别及其象流,那么当这些方法部署在运营网络中用于典型的流量分类任务(如流量整形)时,我们可能会获得显着不同的性能。我们认为,在评估流量分类算法的准确性时,也必须使用字节精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Byte me: a case for byte accuracy in traffic classification
Numerous network traffic classification approaches have recently been proposed. In general, these approaches have focused on correctly identifying a high percentage of total flows. However, on the Internet a small number of "elephant" flows contribute a significant amount of the traffic volume. In addition, some application types like Peer-to-Peer (P2P) and FTP contribute more elephant flows than other applications types like Chat. In this opinion piece, we discuss how evaluating a classifier on flow accuracy alone can bias the classification results. By not giving special attention to these traffic classes and their elephant flows in the evaluation of traffic classification approaches we might obtain significantly different performance when these approaches are deployed in operational networks for typical traffic classification tasks such as traffic shaping. We argue that byte accuracy must also be used when evaluating the accuracy of traffic classification algorithms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信