基于CNN的最新光流估计方法的比较研究

Anis Ammar, Amani Chebbah, Hana Ben Fredj, C. Souani
{"title":"基于CNN的最新光流估计方法的比较研究","authors":"Anis Ammar, Amani Chebbah, Hana Ben Fredj, C. Souani","doi":"10.1109/ISCV54655.2022.9806070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep learning is continuously evolving and making significant advances in several applications. Nevertheless, it has a remarkable influence in the field of image processing. Recently, deep learning has hit the motion estimation area well. Optical flow estimation is a mature and ever-growing field of research. It can be considered a multidisciplinary field. However, it is not easy to get dataset suitable for deep learning of its models. While they have made fundamental contributions, However, it is unclear how to generate more data and generalize it to live scene videos. In this paper, we have tried off extensive analyses and categorized various deep learning-based optical flow estimation techniques. Lately hybrid methods have been very successful. Despite their high performance, even they have performed the state of the art of certain datasets, most bibliographic studies haven’t taken into account these methods. For this, we have added a comparative section of these hybrid algorithms to this study. While describing the set of datasets commonly used by the scientific community, we’ve identified the differences and the correspondences between deep methods and conventional methods. We hope that this extensive research will be a fundamental resource for researchers in the field of image processing and help them better understand and use methods using motion estimation.","PeriodicalId":426665,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study of latest CNN based Optical Flow Estimation\",\"authors\":\"Anis Ammar, Amani Chebbah, Hana Ben Fredj, C. Souani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISCV54655.2022.9806070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deep learning is continuously evolving and making significant advances in several applications. Nevertheless, it has a remarkable influence in the field of image processing. Recently, deep learning has hit the motion estimation area well. Optical flow estimation is a mature and ever-growing field of research. It can be considered a multidisciplinary field. However, it is not easy to get dataset suitable for deep learning of its models. While they have made fundamental contributions, However, it is unclear how to generate more data and generalize it to live scene videos. In this paper, we have tried off extensive analyses and categorized various deep learning-based optical flow estimation techniques. Lately hybrid methods have been very successful. Despite their high performance, even they have performed the state of the art of certain datasets, most bibliographic studies haven’t taken into account these methods. For this, we have added a comparative section of these hybrid algorithms to this study. While describing the set of datasets commonly used by the scientific community, we’ve identified the differences and the correspondences between deep methods and conventional methods. We hope that this extensive research will be a fundamental resource for researchers in the field of image processing and help them better understand and use methods using motion estimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV)\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCV54655.2022.9806070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCV54655.2022.9806070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深度学习正在不断发展,并在多个应用中取得重大进展。然而,它在图像处理领域有着显著的影响。近年来,深度学习在运动估计领域得到了很好的发展。光流估计是一个成熟且不断发展的研究领域。它可以被认为是一个多学科领域。然而,获取适合其模型深度学习的数据集并不容易。虽然他们做出了基础性的贡献,但是,如何生成更多的数据并将其推广到现场视频中还不清楚。在本文中,我们对各种基于深度学习的光流估计技术进行了广泛的分析和分类。最近,混合方法非常成功。尽管它们的性能很高,即使它们已经执行了某些数据集的最新技术,但大多数书目研究并没有考虑到这些方法。为此,我们在本研究中添加了这些混合算法的比较部分。在描述科学界常用的数据集时,我们已经确定了深度方法和常规方法之间的差异和对应关系。我们希望这项广泛的研究将成为图像处理领域研究人员的基础资源,并帮助他们更好地理解和使用运动估计方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study of latest CNN based Optical Flow Estimation
Deep learning is continuously evolving and making significant advances in several applications. Nevertheless, it has a remarkable influence in the field of image processing. Recently, deep learning has hit the motion estimation area well. Optical flow estimation is a mature and ever-growing field of research. It can be considered a multidisciplinary field. However, it is not easy to get dataset suitable for deep learning of its models. While they have made fundamental contributions, However, it is unclear how to generate more data and generalize it to live scene videos. In this paper, we have tried off extensive analyses and categorized various deep learning-based optical flow estimation techniques. Lately hybrid methods have been very successful. Despite their high performance, even they have performed the state of the art of certain datasets, most bibliographic studies haven’t taken into account these methods. For this, we have added a comparative section of these hybrid algorithms to this study. While describing the set of datasets commonly used by the scientific community, we’ve identified the differences and the correspondences between deep methods and conventional methods. We hope that this extensive research will be a fundamental resource for researchers in the field of image processing and help them better understand and use methods using motion estimation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信