“定制”的价值:需求学习、偏好学习和客户行为

Tingliang Huang, Chao Liang, Jingqi Wang
{"title":"“定制”的价值:需求学习、偏好学习和客户行为","authors":"Tingliang Huang, Chao Liang, Jingqi Wang","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2017.2771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“Bespoke,” or mass customization strategy, combines demand learning and preference learning. We develop an analytical framework to study the economic value of bespoke systems and investigate the interaction between demand learning and preference learning. We find that it is possible for demand learning and preference learning to be either complements or substitutes, depending on the customization cost and the demand uncertainty profile. They are generally complements when the personalization cost is low and the probability of having high demand is large. Contrary to usual belief, we show that higher demand uncertainty does not necessarily yield more complementarity benefits. Our numerical study shows that the complementarity benefit becomes weaker when customers are more strategic. Interestingly, the substitute loss can occur when the personalization cost is small and the probability of having high demand is large, when customers are strategic. The online supplement is available at https://doi.org/10.1287...","PeriodicalId":200007,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Statistical Decision Theory; Operations Research (Topic)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Value of 'Bespoke': Demand Learning, Preference Learning, and Customer Behavior\",\"authors\":\"Tingliang Huang, Chao Liang, Jingqi Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1287/mnsc.2017.2771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"“Bespoke,” or mass customization strategy, combines demand learning and preference learning. We develop an analytical framework to study the economic value of bespoke systems and investigate the interaction between demand learning and preference learning. We find that it is possible for demand learning and preference learning to be either complements or substitutes, depending on the customization cost and the demand uncertainty profile. They are generally complements when the personalization cost is low and the probability of having high demand is large. Contrary to usual belief, we show that higher demand uncertainty does not necessarily yield more complementarity benefits. Our numerical study shows that the complementarity benefit becomes weaker when customers are more strategic. Interestingly, the substitute loss can occur when the personalization cost is small and the probability of having high demand is large, when customers are strategic. The online supplement is available at https://doi.org/10.1287...\",\"PeriodicalId\":200007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Statistical Decision Theory; Operations Research (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Statistical Decision Theory; Operations Research (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Statistical Decision Theory; Operations Research (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

“定制”或大规模定制策略结合了需求学习和偏好学习。我们开发了一个分析框架来研究定制系统的经济价值,并调查需求学习和偏好学习之间的相互作用。我们发现需求学习和偏好学习可以互为补充或替代,这取决于定制成本和需求不确定性。当个性化成本较低且需求高的概率较大时,两者通常是互补关系。与通常的看法相反,我们表明更高的需求不确定性并不一定产生更多的互补性利益。我们的数值研究表明,当客户更具战略性时,互补性效益越弱。有趣的是,当个性化成本较小时,当客户具有战略性时,高需求的可能性较大时,替代损失就会发生。在线增刊可在https://doi.org/10.1287找到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Value of 'Bespoke': Demand Learning, Preference Learning, and Customer Behavior
“Bespoke,” or mass customization strategy, combines demand learning and preference learning. We develop an analytical framework to study the economic value of bespoke systems and investigate the interaction between demand learning and preference learning. We find that it is possible for demand learning and preference learning to be either complements or substitutes, depending on the customization cost and the demand uncertainty profile. They are generally complements when the personalization cost is low and the probability of having high demand is large. Contrary to usual belief, we show that higher demand uncertainty does not necessarily yield more complementarity benefits. Our numerical study shows that the complementarity benefit becomes weaker when customers are more strategic. Interestingly, the substitute loss can occur when the personalization cost is small and the probability of having high demand is large, when customers are strategic. The online supplement is available at https://doi.org/10.1287...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信