音乐理论体系:现象还是幻影?

Iryna Tukova
{"title":"音乐理论体系:现象还是幻影?","authors":"Iryna Tukova","doi":"10.31318/2522-4190.2022.134.269570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance of research connects with contemporary state of Ukrainian musicology. Abandoning the guidelines inherited from the Soviet era requires Ukrainian musicologists to rethink a number of positions. In this context, one of the important steps is to correlate the terminology prevailing in Ukrainian musicology with the one that is commonly used in European and American space. One of such specific concepts, which have been established in Ukrainian musicology since the Soviet period, is the music theory system. Its theory was most actively developed in the 1970s and 1980s and entered both scientific circulation and the educational process. At the same time, there is no analogue of this concept and its corresponding theory in European and American musicology. The article is dedicated to analyze of music theory system concept and correlate it with concept of music theory history. \nThe purpose of the article is researching the existing concepts of music theory system, to reveal their originality and correspondence to modern views on the history of Western European music theory. \nMethods. In the article comparative, systematic and historical research methods are used. \nThe results and conclusions. In Ukrainian musicology original concepts of music theory system presented by I. Kotlyarevskyi and G. Viranovskyi, in Russian musicology such concept was developed by Yu. Kholopov and his scientific school. A detailed study of various approaches to music theory system showed, firstly, their inconsistency among themselves. From the analysis of the researches of G. Viranovskyi and I. Kotlyarevskyi, it follows that both authors have in common the chosen systematic method and the idea of the integrity of music theory system of a certain era. However, both the understanding of the structure of the music theory system and the analytical approaches different. Secondly, the characteristics of music theory systems proposed in the studios of G. Viranovskyi and I. Kotlyarevskyi contradict the currently known factual material. In the case of Viranovskyi, a kind of classical-centric view prevails; in the work of Kotlyarevskyi, the emphasis is mainly on the study of the history of the development of pitch organization indicative for Western European practice. Thirdly, the moscow school investigates purely the history of music theory, the systematic approach is applied only to the generalization of the work of individual authors. The perspective of the study of proposed in the article topic can be seen in the appeal to methods of researching the history of music theory approved by European and American scientific practice, their inclusion in circulation in Ukrainian musicology.","PeriodicalId":143313,"journal":{"name":"Scientific herald of Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Music Theory System: Phenomenon or Phantom?\",\"authors\":\"Iryna Tukova\",\"doi\":\"10.31318/2522-4190.2022.134.269570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relevance of research connects with contemporary state of Ukrainian musicology. Abandoning the guidelines inherited from the Soviet era requires Ukrainian musicologists to rethink a number of positions. In this context, one of the important steps is to correlate the terminology prevailing in Ukrainian musicology with the one that is commonly used in European and American space. One of such specific concepts, which have been established in Ukrainian musicology since the Soviet period, is the music theory system. Its theory was most actively developed in the 1970s and 1980s and entered both scientific circulation and the educational process. At the same time, there is no analogue of this concept and its corresponding theory in European and American musicology. The article is dedicated to analyze of music theory system concept and correlate it with concept of music theory history. \\nThe purpose of the article is researching the existing concepts of music theory system, to reveal their originality and correspondence to modern views on the history of Western European music theory. \\nMethods. In the article comparative, systematic and historical research methods are used. \\nThe results and conclusions. In Ukrainian musicology original concepts of music theory system presented by I. Kotlyarevskyi and G. Viranovskyi, in Russian musicology such concept was developed by Yu. Kholopov and his scientific school. A detailed study of various approaches to music theory system showed, firstly, their inconsistency among themselves. From the analysis of the researches of G. Viranovskyi and I. Kotlyarevskyi, it follows that both authors have in common the chosen systematic method and the idea of the integrity of music theory system of a certain era. However, both the understanding of the structure of the music theory system and the analytical approaches different. Secondly, the characteristics of music theory systems proposed in the studios of G. Viranovskyi and I. Kotlyarevskyi contradict the currently known factual material. In the case of Viranovskyi, a kind of classical-centric view prevails; in the work of Kotlyarevskyi, the emphasis is mainly on the study of the history of the development of pitch organization indicative for Western European practice. Thirdly, the moscow school investigates purely the history of music theory, the systematic approach is applied only to the generalization of the work of individual authors. The perspective of the study of proposed in the article topic can be seen in the appeal to methods of researching the history of music theory approved by European and American scientific practice, their inclusion in circulation in Ukrainian musicology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific herald of Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific herald of Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31318/2522-4190.2022.134.269570\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific herald of Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31318/2522-4190.2022.134.269570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究的相关性与乌克兰音乐学的当代状态相联系。放弃从苏联时代继承下来的指导方针需要乌克兰音乐学家重新思考一些立场。在这种情况下,重要的步骤之一是将乌克兰音乐学中流行的术语与欧洲和美国空间中常用的术语联系起来。其中一个具体的概念是音乐理论体系,这是自苏联时期以来在乌克兰音乐学中确立的。它的理论在20世纪70年代和80年代发展最为活跃,并进入了科学流通和教育过程。同时,在欧美音乐学中也没有类似的这一概念及其相应的理论。本文对音乐理论体系概念进行分析,并将其与音乐理论史概念联系起来。本文的目的是研究现有的音乐理论体系概念,揭示其原创性和与现代西欧音乐理论史观点的对应关系。方法。本文采用了比较法、系统研究法和历史研究法。结果和结论。在乌克兰音乐学中,由Kotlyarevskyi和G. Viranovskyi提出了音乐理论体系的原始概念,在俄罗斯音乐学中,这一概念由Yu发展。霍洛波夫和他的科学学派。对各种音乐理论体系研究方法的详细研究表明,首先,它们之间存在着不一致性。从维拉诺夫斯基和科特利亚列夫斯基的研究分析可以看出,两位作者在系统研究方法的选择和对某一时代音乐理论体系整体性的看法上是一致的。然而,无论是对音乐理论体系结构的理解还是分析方法都有所不同。其次,G. Viranovskyi和I. Kotlyarevskyi工作室中提出的音乐理论体系的特点与目前已知的事实材料相矛盾。在维拉诺夫斯基的例子中,一种以古典为中心的观点盛行;在Kotlyarevskyi的工作中,重点主要是研究球场组织的发展历史,为西欧的实践提供参考。第三,莫斯科学派纯粹研究音乐理论史,系统方法只适用于对个别作者作品的概括。文章选题所提出的研究视角,体现在对欧美科学实践所认可的音乐理论史研究方法的诉求,以及在乌克兰音乐学中广为流传的纳入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Music Theory System: Phenomenon or Phantom?
Relevance of research connects with contemporary state of Ukrainian musicology. Abandoning the guidelines inherited from the Soviet era requires Ukrainian musicologists to rethink a number of positions. In this context, one of the important steps is to correlate the terminology prevailing in Ukrainian musicology with the one that is commonly used in European and American space. One of such specific concepts, which have been established in Ukrainian musicology since the Soviet period, is the music theory system. Its theory was most actively developed in the 1970s and 1980s and entered both scientific circulation and the educational process. At the same time, there is no analogue of this concept and its corresponding theory in European and American musicology. The article is dedicated to analyze of music theory system concept and correlate it with concept of music theory history. The purpose of the article is researching the existing concepts of music theory system, to reveal their originality and correspondence to modern views on the history of Western European music theory. Methods. In the article comparative, systematic and historical research methods are used. The results and conclusions. In Ukrainian musicology original concepts of music theory system presented by I. Kotlyarevskyi and G. Viranovskyi, in Russian musicology such concept was developed by Yu. Kholopov and his scientific school. A detailed study of various approaches to music theory system showed, firstly, their inconsistency among themselves. From the analysis of the researches of G. Viranovskyi and I. Kotlyarevskyi, it follows that both authors have in common the chosen systematic method and the idea of the integrity of music theory system of a certain era. However, both the understanding of the structure of the music theory system and the analytical approaches different. Secondly, the characteristics of music theory systems proposed in the studios of G. Viranovskyi and I. Kotlyarevskyi contradict the currently known factual material. In the case of Viranovskyi, a kind of classical-centric view prevails; in the work of Kotlyarevskyi, the emphasis is mainly on the study of the history of the development of pitch organization indicative for Western European practice. Thirdly, the moscow school investigates purely the history of music theory, the systematic approach is applied only to the generalization of the work of individual authors. The perspective of the study of proposed in the article topic can be seen in the appeal to methods of researching the history of music theory approved by European and American scientific practice, their inclusion in circulation in Ukrainian musicology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信