促进大学生态系统的教学变革:探索推动教师发展的“大创意”

H. Dorner, Katarina Mårtensson
{"title":"促进大学生态系统的教学变革:探索推动教师发展的“大创意”","authors":"H. Dorner, Katarina Mårtensson","doi":"10.1556/063.2021.00089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving teaching has continuously been on the agenda worldwide over the past decades (cf. European Commission, 2017; Schumann, Peters, & Olsen, 2013), particularly in a constantly changing higher education climate where new trends cross institutional and national borders. Programs that aim to enhance the quality of teaching and the student learning experience have gradually become a common feature, sometimes even a requirement, of many higher education institutions. In certain geographical areas however, for example Central and Eastern Europe, such development work has only recently begun. Nevertheless, particularly in the post-COVID era, the need for sustainable faculty development initiatives has gained wide recognition and, to a growing extent, become unquestionable. This special issue of the Hungarian Educational Research Journal is therefore a crucial endeavour to situate the international scholarly dialogue about faculty development – also known as educational or academic development – in an intellectual space that has not yet extensively engaged with faculty development practices nor with research on it. Leibowitz (2014) argues that “the way we use the phrase ‘academic development’, or the terrain in which we use it, shifts over time and across geographical locations”, and given this, it is about “the creation of conditions supportive of teaching and learning, in the broadest sense” (p. 359). Known from international institutional practices and reputable scholarly work, academic development units are hence charged with supporting faculty in enhancing their teaching and mentoring, and acting as catalysts for pedagogical change. As Gibbs (2013) remarks, this increasingly complex mission implies diverse theoretical grounding and approaches to faculty development. Over time, Gibbs argues, the academic development practice has moved from advising and consulting individual faculty on their teaching practices to increasingly also focus","PeriodicalId":235465,"journal":{"name":"Hungarian Educational Research Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catalysing pedagogical change in the university ecosystem: Exploring ‘big ideas’ that drive faculty development\",\"authors\":\"H. Dorner, Katarina Mårtensson\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/063.2021.00089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Improving teaching has continuously been on the agenda worldwide over the past decades (cf. European Commission, 2017; Schumann, Peters, & Olsen, 2013), particularly in a constantly changing higher education climate where new trends cross institutional and national borders. Programs that aim to enhance the quality of teaching and the student learning experience have gradually become a common feature, sometimes even a requirement, of many higher education institutions. In certain geographical areas however, for example Central and Eastern Europe, such development work has only recently begun. Nevertheless, particularly in the post-COVID era, the need for sustainable faculty development initiatives has gained wide recognition and, to a growing extent, become unquestionable. This special issue of the Hungarian Educational Research Journal is therefore a crucial endeavour to situate the international scholarly dialogue about faculty development – also known as educational or academic development – in an intellectual space that has not yet extensively engaged with faculty development practices nor with research on it. Leibowitz (2014) argues that “the way we use the phrase ‘academic development’, or the terrain in which we use it, shifts over time and across geographical locations”, and given this, it is about “the creation of conditions supportive of teaching and learning, in the broadest sense” (p. 359). Known from international institutional practices and reputable scholarly work, academic development units are hence charged with supporting faculty in enhancing their teaching and mentoring, and acting as catalysts for pedagogical change. As Gibbs (2013) remarks, this increasingly complex mission implies diverse theoretical grounding and approaches to faculty development. Over time, Gibbs argues, the academic development practice has moved from advising and consulting individual faculty on their teaching practices to increasingly also focus\",\"PeriodicalId\":235465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hungarian Educational Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hungarian Educational Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2021.00089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hungarian Educational Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/063.2021.00089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的几十年里,改善教学一直被提上全球议程(参见欧盟委员会,2017;Schumann, Peters, & Olsen, 2013),特别是在不断变化的高等教育环境中,新的趋势跨越了机构和国界。旨在提高教学质量和学生学习体验的课程逐渐成为许多高等教育机构的共同特点,有时甚至是一种要求。但是,在某些地理区域,例如中欧和东欧,这种发展工作最近才开始。然而,特别是在后新冠时代,对可持续教师发展倡议的需求得到了广泛认可,并且在越来越大的程度上成为毋庸置疑的。因此,《匈牙利教育研究杂志》的这一期特刊是一项至关重要的努力,旨在将关于教师发展(也称为教育或学术发展)的国际学术对话置于一个尚未广泛参与教师发展实践或研究的知识空间中。莱博维茨(2014)认为,“我们使用‘学术发展’这个词的方式,或者我们使用它的地域,会随着时间和地理位置的变化而变化”,鉴于此,它是关于“在最广泛的意义上创造支持教学和学习的条件”(第359页)。从国际机构的实践和著名的学术工作中,学术发展单位因此负责支持教师加强教学和指导,并作为教学变革的催化剂。正如吉布斯(2013)所说,这一日益复杂的使命意味着教师发展的理论基础和方法的多样化。吉布斯认为,随着时间的推移,学术发展实践已经从对个别教师的教学实践提供建议和咨询转变为越来越多的关注
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Catalysing pedagogical change in the university ecosystem: Exploring ‘big ideas’ that drive faculty development
Improving teaching has continuously been on the agenda worldwide over the past decades (cf. European Commission, 2017; Schumann, Peters, & Olsen, 2013), particularly in a constantly changing higher education climate where new trends cross institutional and national borders. Programs that aim to enhance the quality of teaching and the student learning experience have gradually become a common feature, sometimes even a requirement, of many higher education institutions. In certain geographical areas however, for example Central and Eastern Europe, such development work has only recently begun. Nevertheless, particularly in the post-COVID era, the need for sustainable faculty development initiatives has gained wide recognition and, to a growing extent, become unquestionable. This special issue of the Hungarian Educational Research Journal is therefore a crucial endeavour to situate the international scholarly dialogue about faculty development – also known as educational or academic development – in an intellectual space that has not yet extensively engaged with faculty development practices nor with research on it. Leibowitz (2014) argues that “the way we use the phrase ‘academic development’, or the terrain in which we use it, shifts over time and across geographical locations”, and given this, it is about “the creation of conditions supportive of teaching and learning, in the broadest sense” (p. 359). Known from international institutional practices and reputable scholarly work, academic development units are hence charged with supporting faculty in enhancing their teaching and mentoring, and acting as catalysts for pedagogical change. As Gibbs (2013) remarks, this increasingly complex mission implies diverse theoretical grounding and approaches to faculty development. Over time, Gibbs argues, the academic development practice has moved from advising and consulting individual faculty on their teaching practices to increasingly also focus
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信