{"title":"公元三世纪亚历山大大帝的回归:一个关于戴蒙尼斯和身体不朽的问题","authors":"D. Endsjø","doi":"10.7146/classicaetmediaevalia.v70i.130262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nWhy was an unknown man insisting he was Alexander the Great received with distinct deference by Roman officials and Bacchic celebration by hundreds of attendants around A.D. 221? Examining Dio Cassius’s presentation in light of contemporary beliefs, one finds that the enthusiastic reception most probably was due to the con-viction that Alexander had actually returned physically immortal and deified, either resurrected or never having died at all. The respectful awe of the officials was also most likely caused by either this belief or by their holding that this was the dead and disembodied hērōs of the famed conqueror. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":306790,"journal":{"name":"Classica et Mediaevalia","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Return of Alexander the Great in the Third Century A.D.: a Question of Daimones and Physical Immortality\",\"authors\":\"D. Endsjø\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/classicaetmediaevalia.v70i.130262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\nWhy was an unknown man insisting he was Alexander the Great received with distinct deference by Roman officials and Bacchic celebration by hundreds of attendants around A.D. 221? Examining Dio Cassius’s presentation in light of contemporary beliefs, one finds that the enthusiastic reception most probably was due to the con-viction that Alexander had actually returned physically immortal and deified, either resurrected or never having died at all. The respectful awe of the officials was also most likely caused by either this belief or by their holding that this was the dead and disembodied hērōs of the famed conqueror. \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":306790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Classica et Mediaevalia\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Classica et Mediaevalia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/classicaetmediaevalia.v70i.130262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classica et Mediaevalia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/classicaetmediaevalia.v70i.130262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Return of Alexander the Great in the Third Century A.D.: a Question of Daimones and Physical Immortality
Why was an unknown man insisting he was Alexander the Great received with distinct deference by Roman officials and Bacchic celebration by hundreds of attendants around A.D. 221? Examining Dio Cassius’s presentation in light of contemporary beliefs, one finds that the enthusiastic reception most probably was due to the con-viction that Alexander had actually returned physically immortal and deified, either resurrected or never having died at all. The respectful awe of the officials was also most likely caused by either this belief or by their holding that this was the dead and disembodied hērōs of the famed conqueror.