精细化管理提高国家自然科学基金项目申请建议书质量的探索

Yixiang Chen, Yang Zhang
{"title":"精细化管理提高国家自然科学基金项目申请建议书质量的探索","authors":"Yixiang Chen, Yang Zhang","doi":"10.2991/aemh-19.2019.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) is the main channel to support basic research and applied basic research in China. As the support unit of the National Natural Science Foundation, as with the brotherhood, there is a contradiction between the good wishes of the applicant and the unbalanced and inadequate application of the supply of comprehensive elements. The supply of high quality, high level and high grade proposal is a prerequisite for improving the subsidizing rate of supporting units and solving this general contradiction. Based on the analysis and summary of the inadmissibility of the science fund and the feedback from the peer reviews of applications that have not been funded in the past five years, a series of meticulous management measures have been explored, which in order to help applicants improve the quality of application writing, and then improve the project funding rate. 精细化管理提高科学基金申请书撰写质量探索","PeriodicalId":333655,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Advanced Education, Management and Humanities (AEMH 2019)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration on Improving Quality of the Proposal of NSFC’s Project Application by Meticulous Management\",\"authors\":\"Yixiang Chen, Yang Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/aemh-19.2019.54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) is the main channel to support basic research and applied basic research in China. As the support unit of the National Natural Science Foundation, as with the brotherhood, there is a contradiction between the good wishes of the applicant and the unbalanced and inadequate application of the supply of comprehensive elements. The supply of high quality, high level and high grade proposal is a prerequisite for improving the subsidizing rate of supporting units and solving this general contradiction. Based on the analysis and summary of the inadmissibility of the science fund and the feedback from the peer reviews of applications that have not been funded in the past five years, a series of meticulous management measures have been explored, which in order to help applicants improve the quality of application writing, and then improve the project funding rate. 精细化管理提高科学基金申请书撰写质量探索\",\"PeriodicalId\":333655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Advanced Education, Management and Humanities (AEMH 2019)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Advanced Education, Management and Humanities (AEMH 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/aemh-19.2019.54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Advanced Education, Management and Humanities (AEMH 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/aemh-19.2019.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国家自然科学基金是中国支持基础研究和应用基础研究的主要渠道。作为国家自然科学基金的支持单位,如同兄弟般,申请人的良好愿望与综合要素供给的不平衡和不充分的应用之间存在矛盾。提供优质、高水平、高品位的方案是提高配套单位补贴率、解决这一普遍矛盾的前提。通过对近五年来科学基金不可受理情况的分析和总结,以及对未获资助申请的同行评审反馈,探索出一系列精细化管理措施,以帮助申请人提高申请写作质量,进而提高项目获资助率。精细化管理提高科学基金申请书撰写质量探索
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploration on Improving Quality of the Proposal of NSFC’s Project Application by Meticulous Management
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) is the main channel to support basic research and applied basic research in China. As the support unit of the National Natural Science Foundation, as with the brotherhood, there is a contradiction between the good wishes of the applicant and the unbalanced and inadequate application of the supply of comprehensive elements. The supply of high quality, high level and high grade proposal is a prerequisite for improving the subsidizing rate of supporting units and solving this general contradiction. Based on the analysis and summary of the inadmissibility of the science fund and the feedback from the peer reviews of applications that have not been funded in the past five years, a series of meticulous management measures have been explored, which in order to help applicants improve the quality of application writing, and then improve the project funding rate. 精细化管理提高科学基金申请书撰写质量探索
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信