有趣的朋友吗?荷兰外交政策,英国和欧洲一体化在“漫长的”1970年代

Marc Dorpema
{"title":"有趣的朋友吗?荷兰外交政策,英国和欧洲一体化在“漫长的”1970年代","authors":"Marc Dorpema","doi":"10.1080/13507486.2022.2051442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is concerned with the still understudied and frequently misunderstood 1970s. It homes in on Dutch foreign policy regarding Great Britain and European integration to question the long-standing assumption that Dutch policymaking in this period became ‘realistic’ and consumed by a yearning for ‘instrumental supranationalism’. Through a study of Dutch and British government archives, this paper thus lays bare the contradictions that inhered in Dutch visions of European integration and asks how Dutch aims could be squared with support for British accession, ultimately demonstrating why ‘realistic’ and ‘irrational’ are perilous analytical categories when used to interrogate large bureaucratic machineries composed of many individuals with different goals and desires struggling over limited resources.","PeriodicalId":151994,"journal":{"name":"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Funny friends? Dutch foreign policy, Great Britain and European integration in the ‘long’ 1970s\",\"authors\":\"Marc Dorpema\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13507486.2022.2051442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article is concerned with the still understudied and frequently misunderstood 1970s. It homes in on Dutch foreign policy regarding Great Britain and European integration to question the long-standing assumption that Dutch policymaking in this period became ‘realistic’ and consumed by a yearning for ‘instrumental supranationalism’. Through a study of Dutch and British government archives, this paper thus lays bare the contradictions that inhered in Dutch visions of European integration and asks how Dutch aims could be squared with support for British accession, ultimately demonstrating why ‘realistic’ and ‘irrational’ are perilous analytical categories when used to interrogate large bureaucratic machineries composed of many individuals with different goals and desires struggling over limited resources.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2022.2051442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2022.2051442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文关注的是仍未被充分研究和经常被误解的20世纪70年代。它着眼于荷兰对英国和欧洲一体化的外交政策,质疑长期以来的假设,即荷兰在这一时期的政策制定变得“现实”,并被对“工具性超国家主义”的渴望所消耗。因此,通过对荷兰和英国政府档案的研究,本文揭示了荷兰对欧洲一体化愿景中固有的矛盾,并询问荷兰的目标如何与支持英国加入相一致,最终证明了为什么“现实的”和“非理性的”是危险的分析类别,当用于询问由许多具有不同目标和愿望的个人组成的大型官僚机构时,在有限的资源中挣扎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Funny friends? Dutch foreign policy, Great Britain and European integration in the ‘long’ 1970s
ABSTRACT This article is concerned with the still understudied and frequently misunderstood 1970s. It homes in on Dutch foreign policy regarding Great Britain and European integration to question the long-standing assumption that Dutch policymaking in this period became ‘realistic’ and consumed by a yearning for ‘instrumental supranationalism’. Through a study of Dutch and British government archives, this paper thus lays bare the contradictions that inhered in Dutch visions of European integration and asks how Dutch aims could be squared with support for British accession, ultimately demonstrating why ‘realistic’ and ‘irrational’ are perilous analytical categories when used to interrogate large bureaucratic machineries composed of many individuals with different goals and desires struggling over limited resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信