《殖民电影:1945-73年香港官方电影制作的发展》、《香港电影组》(1959-73)和《这就是香港》(1961)

I. Aitken, M. Ingham
{"title":"《殖民电影:1945-73年香港官方电影制作的发展》、《香港电影组》(1959-73)和《这就是香港》(1961)","authors":"I. Aitken, M. Ingham","doi":"10.1515/9780748664702-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colonial film-making, in the guise of British official film-making, as opposed to the early entrepreneurial British/US/French film-making of the 1898– 1914 period, developed slowly in Hong Kong over the period from 1945 to the abolition of the Hong Kong Film Unit (HKFU) in 1973; and, in order to understand the reasons for that slow progression it will first be necessary to consider some problems and impediments that had already developed prior to and during the Second World War, problems which were related to an antagonism between a ‘Colonial Office’ (CO) and ‘Griersonian’ tradition. The term ‘Griersonian’ is often used as an abbreviation for the British documentary film movement of the 1930s and 1940s. There are problems associated with such abbreviation, principally, that the movement as a whole becomes subsumed under the name of its leader: John Grierson. Nevertheless, in order to be terminologically concise, and in the absence of suitable alternative terminology, the term ‘Griersonian’ will be employed here, but in a global sense, not to refer to matters very close to Grierson himself, but to the tradition of the British documentary film movement as a whole. Such employment is warranted here because this chapter is to a considerable extent concerned with an opposition between a general ‘Griersonian’ and ‘CO’ approach to official film-making. Put succinctly, if epigrammatically, the Griersonian approach involves making documentary films which attempt to advance the progress of democratic-liberal development across a broad filmic front, whilst the CO approach involves the production of much simpler films which make specific, pragmatic interventions, usually in order to consolidate a more conservative status quo.","PeriodicalId":404592,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Documentary Film","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"3 Colonial Film: The Development of Official Film-making in Hong Kong, 1945–73, the Hong Kong Film Unit (1959–73) and This is Hong Kong (1961\",\"authors\":\"I. Aitken, M. Ingham\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9780748664702-004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Colonial film-making, in the guise of British official film-making, as opposed to the early entrepreneurial British/US/French film-making of the 1898– 1914 period, developed slowly in Hong Kong over the period from 1945 to the abolition of the Hong Kong Film Unit (HKFU) in 1973; and, in order to understand the reasons for that slow progression it will first be necessary to consider some problems and impediments that had already developed prior to and during the Second World War, problems which were related to an antagonism between a ‘Colonial Office’ (CO) and ‘Griersonian’ tradition. The term ‘Griersonian’ is often used as an abbreviation for the British documentary film movement of the 1930s and 1940s. There are problems associated with such abbreviation, principally, that the movement as a whole becomes subsumed under the name of its leader: John Grierson. Nevertheless, in order to be terminologically concise, and in the absence of suitable alternative terminology, the term ‘Griersonian’ will be employed here, but in a global sense, not to refer to matters very close to Grierson himself, but to the tradition of the British documentary film movement as a whole. Such employment is warranted here because this chapter is to a considerable extent concerned with an opposition between a general ‘Griersonian’ and ‘CO’ approach to official film-making. Put succinctly, if epigrammatically, the Griersonian approach involves making documentary films which attempt to advance the progress of democratic-liberal development across a broad filmic front, whilst the CO approach involves the production of much simpler films which make specific, pragmatic interventions, usually in order to consolidate a more conservative status quo.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hong Kong Documentary Film\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hong Kong Documentary Film\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748664702-004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Documentary Film","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748664702-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从1945年到1973年香港电影组(HKFU)被废除,殖民地电影制作在英国官方电影制作的幌子下,与1898 - 1914年早期英国/美国/法国的创业电影制作相反,在香港缓慢发展;为了理解这种缓慢进展的原因,首先有必要考虑一些问题和障碍,这些问题和障碍在第二次世界大战之前和期间就已经出现了,这些问题与“殖民办公室”(CO)和“格里尔森”传统之间的对抗有关。“Griersonian”这个词经常被用作20世纪30年代和40年代英国纪录片运动的缩写。与这种缩写有关的问题主要是,该运动作为一个整体被归入其领导人约翰·格里尔森的名下。然而,为了在术语上简洁,并且在缺乏合适的替代术语的情况下,这里将使用“Griersonian”一词,但在全球意义上,不是指与Grierson本人非常接近的事情,而是指整个英国纪录片运动的传统。这样的雇佣在这里是合理的,因为这一章在很大程度上关注的是官方电影制作中一般的“格里尔森”和“CO”方法之间的对立。简而言之,如果用警句来说,Griersonian方法包括制作纪录片,试图在广泛的电影战线上推进民主自由发展的进程,而CO方法包括制作更简单的电影,这些电影进行具体的,务实的干预,通常是为了巩固更保守的现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
3 Colonial Film: The Development of Official Film-making in Hong Kong, 1945–73, the Hong Kong Film Unit (1959–73) and This is Hong Kong (1961
Colonial film-making, in the guise of British official film-making, as opposed to the early entrepreneurial British/US/French film-making of the 1898– 1914 period, developed slowly in Hong Kong over the period from 1945 to the abolition of the Hong Kong Film Unit (HKFU) in 1973; and, in order to understand the reasons for that slow progression it will first be necessary to consider some problems and impediments that had already developed prior to and during the Second World War, problems which were related to an antagonism between a ‘Colonial Office’ (CO) and ‘Griersonian’ tradition. The term ‘Griersonian’ is often used as an abbreviation for the British documentary film movement of the 1930s and 1940s. There are problems associated with such abbreviation, principally, that the movement as a whole becomes subsumed under the name of its leader: John Grierson. Nevertheless, in order to be terminologically concise, and in the absence of suitable alternative terminology, the term ‘Griersonian’ will be employed here, but in a global sense, not to refer to matters very close to Grierson himself, but to the tradition of the British documentary film movement as a whole. Such employment is warranted here because this chapter is to a considerable extent concerned with an opposition between a general ‘Griersonian’ and ‘CO’ approach to official film-making. Put succinctly, if epigrammatically, the Griersonian approach involves making documentary films which attempt to advance the progress of democratic-liberal development across a broad filmic front, whilst the CO approach involves the production of much simpler films which make specific, pragmatic interventions, usually in order to consolidate a more conservative status quo.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信