模型驱动的Web服务组合的挑战和解决方案

K. Pfadenhauer, B. Kittl, S. Dustdar
{"title":"模型驱动的Web服务组合的挑战和解决方案","authors":"K. Pfadenhauer, B. Kittl, S. Dustdar","doi":"10.1109/WETICE.2005.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"System theory propagates the use of models which raise the level of abstraction to cope with complexity, evolving out of variety and connectivity. Different modeling techniques have been invented for the abstract description of certain aspects of dynamic system behaviour. Nowadays process models are also an accepted part of service oriented process design. Although service oriented architecture (SOA) is the aim, rather isolated processes are the starting point for executable code generation and not the changing functionality distribution the system offers. Thus we claim the system view, necessary for process lifecycle management, is missing. Moreover, in the context of Web service composition, a vertical, bi-directional model driven approach allows for manifold allocation of e.g. testing, validation or binding tasks within the layer stack of MDAs (model driven architecture). In this paper, we discuss two distinctive proposals for model driven service composition, followed by a comparison of representative mapping scenarios offered by IBM and Microsoft.","PeriodicalId":128074,"journal":{"name":"14th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprise (WETICE'05)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges and solutions for model driven Web service composition\",\"authors\":\"K. Pfadenhauer, B. Kittl, S. Dustdar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WETICE.2005.24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"System theory propagates the use of models which raise the level of abstraction to cope with complexity, evolving out of variety and connectivity. Different modeling techniques have been invented for the abstract description of certain aspects of dynamic system behaviour. Nowadays process models are also an accepted part of service oriented process design. Although service oriented architecture (SOA) is the aim, rather isolated processes are the starting point for executable code generation and not the changing functionality distribution the system offers. Thus we claim the system view, necessary for process lifecycle management, is missing. Moreover, in the context of Web service composition, a vertical, bi-directional model driven approach allows for manifold allocation of e.g. testing, validation or binding tasks within the layer stack of MDAs (model driven architecture). In this paper, we discuss two distinctive proposals for model driven service composition, followed by a comparison of representative mapping scenarios offered by IBM and Microsoft.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"14th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprise (WETICE'05)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"14th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprise (WETICE'05)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2005.24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprise (WETICE'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2005.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

系统理论传播了模型的使用,这些模型提高了抽象水平,以应对复杂性,从多样性和连接性中发展出来。为了对动态系统行为的某些方面进行抽象描述,已经发明了不同的建模技术。如今,流程模型也是面向服务的流程设计的一部分。尽管面向服务的体系结构(SOA)是目标,但相对孤立的流程是可执行代码生成的起点,而不是系统提供的不断变化的功能分布。因此,我们声称缺少过程生命周期管理所必需的系统视图。此外,在Web服务组合的上下文中,垂直的、双向模型驱动的方法允许在mda(模型驱动的体系结构)的层栈中进行多种分配,例如测试、验证或绑定任务。在本文中,我们讨论了模型驱动服务组合的两个不同的建议,然后比较了IBM和Microsoft提供的代表性映射场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges and solutions for model driven Web service composition
System theory propagates the use of models which raise the level of abstraction to cope with complexity, evolving out of variety and connectivity. Different modeling techniques have been invented for the abstract description of certain aspects of dynamic system behaviour. Nowadays process models are also an accepted part of service oriented process design. Although service oriented architecture (SOA) is the aim, rather isolated processes are the starting point for executable code generation and not the changing functionality distribution the system offers. Thus we claim the system view, necessary for process lifecycle management, is missing. Moreover, in the context of Web service composition, a vertical, bi-directional model driven approach allows for manifold allocation of e.g. testing, validation or binding tasks within the layer stack of MDAs (model driven architecture). In this paper, we discuss two distinctive proposals for model driven service composition, followed by a comparison of representative mapping scenarios offered by IBM and Microsoft.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信