高屈曲膝关节假体增加后髁切口可能损伤腘肌腱起源:一项尸体研究

O. Phruetthiphat
{"title":"高屈曲膝关节假体增加后髁切口可能损伤腘肌腱起源:一项尸体研究","authors":"O. Phruetthiphat","doi":"10.23880/jobd-16000193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: High-flex total knee prosthesis designs were proposed to improve flexion in total knee replacement (TKA). One of high-flex features is increasing posterior condyle cut which put popliteal tendon in higher risk of injury and may result in gap changes. Methods: Thirty-six popliteal origin sites from eighteen fresh cadavers were measured distances between the posterior rim of popliteal tendon origin and posterior border of the lateral femoral condyle (distance A) using digital “Vernier caliper”. The mean distances were compared to posterior condyle thickness of different prosthesis designs. Results: The mean of distance A on the right knee was 9.59 ±1.66 mm (6.03-12.70) while the mean of distance A on the left knee was 9.13 ± 1.78 mm (5.80-11.07). Posterior condyle thickness of the femoral prostheses varies upon their design and size from 7.4 to 10 mm for standard model and from 8.2 to 12.5 mm for high-flex design. Possibilities of popliteal tendon injury during posterior condyle bone cut were 16.7% to 66.7% for standard model and 27.8% to 97.2% for the high-flex design. Conclusion: High-flex TKA prosthesis with thicker posterior condyle relates to higher possibility of popliteal tendon origin injury compared to standard one.","PeriodicalId":447832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics & Bone Disorders","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing posterior condyle cut for high-flex knee prosthesis may injure popliteus tendon origin: a cadaveric study\",\"authors\":\"O. Phruetthiphat\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/jobd-16000193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: High-flex total knee prosthesis designs were proposed to improve flexion in total knee replacement (TKA). One of high-flex features is increasing posterior condyle cut which put popliteal tendon in higher risk of injury and may result in gap changes. Methods: Thirty-six popliteal origin sites from eighteen fresh cadavers were measured distances between the posterior rim of popliteal tendon origin and posterior border of the lateral femoral condyle (distance A) using digital “Vernier caliper”. The mean distances were compared to posterior condyle thickness of different prosthesis designs. Results: The mean of distance A on the right knee was 9.59 ±1.66 mm (6.03-12.70) while the mean of distance A on the left knee was 9.13 ± 1.78 mm (5.80-11.07). Posterior condyle thickness of the femoral prostheses varies upon their design and size from 7.4 to 10 mm for standard model and from 8.2 to 12.5 mm for high-flex design. Possibilities of popliteal tendon injury during posterior condyle bone cut were 16.7% to 66.7% for standard model and 27.8% to 97.2% for the high-flex design. Conclusion: High-flex TKA prosthesis with thicker posterior condyle relates to higher possibility of popliteal tendon origin injury compared to standard one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics & Bone Disorders\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics & Bone Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/jobd-16000193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics & Bone Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/jobd-16000193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了改善全膝关节置换术(TKA)的屈曲度,提出了高屈曲全膝关节假体设计。高屈曲的特征之一是增加后髁切割,使腘肌腱损伤的风险更高,并可能导致间隙改变。方法:用数字游标卡尺测量18具新鲜尸体36个腘窝起源地距腘窝肌腱起源地后缘至股外侧髁后缘的距离(距离A)。比较不同假体设计的后髁厚度与平均距离。结果:右膝A距平均值为9.59±1.66 mm(6.03 ~ 12.70),左膝A距平均值为9.13±1.78 mm(5.80 ~ 11.07)。股骨假体的后髁厚度因其设计和尺寸而异,标准模型为7.4至10毫米,高弯曲设计为8.2至12.5毫米。后髁截骨时腘肌腱损伤的可能性,标准模型为16.7% ~ 66.7%,高屈曲设计为27.8% ~ 97.2%。结论:后髁较厚的高屈曲TKA假体与标准假体相比,腘肌腱源损伤的可能性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increasing posterior condyle cut for high-flex knee prosthesis may injure popliteus tendon origin: a cadaveric study
Background: High-flex total knee prosthesis designs were proposed to improve flexion in total knee replacement (TKA). One of high-flex features is increasing posterior condyle cut which put popliteal tendon in higher risk of injury and may result in gap changes. Methods: Thirty-six popliteal origin sites from eighteen fresh cadavers were measured distances between the posterior rim of popliteal tendon origin and posterior border of the lateral femoral condyle (distance A) using digital “Vernier caliper”. The mean distances were compared to posterior condyle thickness of different prosthesis designs. Results: The mean of distance A on the right knee was 9.59 ±1.66 mm (6.03-12.70) while the mean of distance A on the left knee was 9.13 ± 1.78 mm (5.80-11.07). Posterior condyle thickness of the femoral prostheses varies upon their design and size from 7.4 to 10 mm for standard model and from 8.2 to 12.5 mm for high-flex design. Possibilities of popliteal tendon injury during posterior condyle bone cut were 16.7% to 66.7% for standard model and 27.8% to 97.2% for the high-flex design. Conclusion: High-flex TKA prosthesis with thicker posterior condyle relates to higher possibility of popliteal tendon origin injury compared to standard one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信