{"title":"印度尼西亚为和平与正义而战:可持续发展目标鸟瞰图","authors":"Wicipto Setiadi","doi":"10.4108/EAI.5-8-2019.2308668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". This paper aims to distinguish the current progress of SDG 16 implementation in Indonesia from a governance perspective and it’s interconnectedness with Indonesia’s past, present, and future technocratic plans. Although Goal 16 has numerous benefits to improve the quality of humanity and society itself, Indonesia has managed to synchronize, yet there are still critical dispute on how inclusive and progressive Goal 16 is when implemented in practice. The overall paper was based on desk and literary review from highlighting several standpoints on Goal 16 particularly on; a. Corruption and Bribery, b. Participatory Approach, and c. Institutional Building Capacity. Overall, in the implementation of SDGs Goal 16, there has been progressive achievement due to the collaboration of 4 stakeholders that reflect ‘no one left behind’ principle. Further, Indonesia commitment on actualizing SDGs is reflected on the participation of Voluntary National Review 2017. Surprisingly, Indonesia turns to be one of 6 countries that has outstanding best practice of compares to others. In the future, the commitment is continued to the mainstreaming all SDGs target into National Development Medium Plan ( Rancangan Pembangunan Jangka Menengah /RPJMN 2020 – 2024). Though, there are still issues need to be settled, but with SDGs mainstreaming into RPJMN 2020 – 2024 hopefully the sustainability of the agenda is rest assured. The paper presented is based on literature reviews and documents relating to the subject at hand. From this research, systematic writing was produced using a juridical-analytical approach and qualitative results was obtained.","PeriodicalId":224997,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fundamental Rights, I-COFFEES 2019, 5-6 August 2019, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indonesia’s Combat for Peace and Justice: A Bird’s Eye View of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) 16\",\"authors\":\"Wicipto Setiadi\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/EAI.5-8-2019.2308668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". This paper aims to distinguish the current progress of SDG 16 implementation in Indonesia from a governance perspective and it’s interconnectedness with Indonesia’s past, present, and future technocratic plans. Although Goal 16 has numerous benefits to improve the quality of humanity and society itself, Indonesia has managed to synchronize, yet there are still critical dispute on how inclusive and progressive Goal 16 is when implemented in practice. The overall paper was based on desk and literary review from highlighting several standpoints on Goal 16 particularly on; a. Corruption and Bribery, b. Participatory Approach, and c. Institutional Building Capacity. Overall, in the implementation of SDGs Goal 16, there has been progressive achievement due to the collaboration of 4 stakeholders that reflect ‘no one left behind’ principle. Further, Indonesia commitment on actualizing SDGs is reflected on the participation of Voluntary National Review 2017. Surprisingly, Indonesia turns to be one of 6 countries that has outstanding best practice of compares to others. In the future, the commitment is continued to the mainstreaming all SDGs target into National Development Medium Plan ( Rancangan Pembangunan Jangka Menengah /RPJMN 2020 – 2024). Though, there are still issues need to be settled, but with SDGs mainstreaming into RPJMN 2020 – 2024 hopefully the sustainability of the agenda is rest assured. The paper presented is based on literature reviews and documents relating to the subject at hand. From this research, systematic writing was produced using a juridical-analytical approach and qualitative results was obtained.\",\"PeriodicalId\":224997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fundamental Rights, I-COFFEES 2019, 5-6 August 2019, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fundamental Rights, I-COFFEES 2019, 5-6 August 2019, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.5-8-2019.2308668\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Fundamental Rights, I-COFFEES 2019, 5-6 August 2019, Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.5-8-2019.2308668","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
. 本文旨在从治理的角度区分可持续发展目标16在印度尼西亚实施的当前进展,以及它与印度尼西亚过去、现在和未来的技术官僚计划的相互联系。虽然目标16对提高人类和社会本身的质量有许多好处,但印度尼西亚已经设法同步,但在实践中实施目标16时,其包容性和进步性仍然存在重大争议。整个论文是基于桌面和文学评论,突出了目标16的几个立场,特别是;a.腐败和贿赂,b.参与式方法,c.机构建设能力。总体而言,在实施可持续发展目标16方面,由于四个利益攸关方的合作,体现了“不让任何一个人掉队”的原则,取得了渐进式的成就。此外,印度尼西亚对实现可持续发展目标的承诺反映在2017年自愿国家审查的参与上。令人惊讶的是,印度尼西亚成为了六个与其他国家相比具有杰出最佳实践的国家之一。未来,我们将继续致力于将所有可持续发展目标纳入国家发展中期计划(Rancangan Pembangunan Jangka Menengah /RPJMN 2020 - 2024)。尽管仍有一些问题需要解决,但随着可持续发展目标被纳入RPJMN 2020 - 2024的主流,希望议程的可持续性得到保证。所提出的论文是基于文献综述和有关手头主题的文件。从这项研究中,使用司法分析方法产生了系统的写作,并获得了定性结果。
Indonesia’s Combat for Peace and Justice: A Bird’s Eye View of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS) 16
. This paper aims to distinguish the current progress of SDG 16 implementation in Indonesia from a governance perspective and it’s interconnectedness with Indonesia’s past, present, and future technocratic plans. Although Goal 16 has numerous benefits to improve the quality of humanity and society itself, Indonesia has managed to synchronize, yet there are still critical dispute on how inclusive and progressive Goal 16 is when implemented in practice. The overall paper was based on desk and literary review from highlighting several standpoints on Goal 16 particularly on; a. Corruption and Bribery, b. Participatory Approach, and c. Institutional Building Capacity. Overall, in the implementation of SDGs Goal 16, there has been progressive achievement due to the collaboration of 4 stakeholders that reflect ‘no one left behind’ principle. Further, Indonesia commitment on actualizing SDGs is reflected on the participation of Voluntary National Review 2017. Surprisingly, Indonesia turns to be one of 6 countries that has outstanding best practice of compares to others. In the future, the commitment is continued to the mainstreaming all SDGs target into National Development Medium Plan ( Rancangan Pembangunan Jangka Menengah /RPJMN 2020 – 2024). Though, there are still issues need to be settled, but with SDGs mainstreaming into RPJMN 2020 – 2024 hopefully the sustainability of the agenda is rest assured. The paper presented is based on literature reviews and documents relating to the subject at hand. From this research, systematic writing was produced using a juridical-analytical approach and qualitative results was obtained.