在工业环境中评估软件开发人员首选的表示系统的三角测量实验

Methanias Colaço, M. A. Farias, Igor Maciel, Paulo Henrique dos Santos, Manoel G. Mendonça
{"title":"在工业环境中评估软件开发人员首选的表示系统的三角测量实验","authors":"Methanias Colaço, M. A. Farias, Igor Maciel, Paulo Henrique dos Santos, Manoel G. Mendonça","doi":"10.1109/SBES.2014.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software development results in historic data. In recent years, researchers have been conducting linguistic analyses of mailing lists to understand the intricacies of software development. A new approach for that is to use Neurolinguistic Theory (NT). NT postulates that each person uses a preferred representational cognitive system (PRS) in each specific context. Thus, although each software developer uses a variety of representational systems to understand software, each has his or her own preferred representational system. In this paper, we analyze a psychometrically-based neurolinguistic method to classify the PRSs of software developers in an industrial setting. Our experimental evaluation of the approach is carried out in three combined experiments: (1) a study assesses the PRSs of industrial developers using a project's mailing lists; (2) a survey of software developers to establish their PRSs; and (3) a controlled experiment that carefully analyzes and visualizes strategies to perform software comprehension activities supported by a visualization tool. The results indicate that our approach can indeed be used to determine software developers' PRS.","PeriodicalId":426125,"journal":{"name":"2014 Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Triangulating Experiments in an Industrial Setting to Evaluate Preferred Representational Systems of Software Developers\",\"authors\":\"Methanias Colaço, M. A. Farias, Igor Maciel, Paulo Henrique dos Santos, Manoel G. Mendonça\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SBES.2014.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software development results in historic data. In recent years, researchers have been conducting linguistic analyses of mailing lists to understand the intricacies of software development. A new approach for that is to use Neurolinguistic Theory (NT). NT postulates that each person uses a preferred representational cognitive system (PRS) in each specific context. Thus, although each software developer uses a variety of representational systems to understand software, each has his or her own preferred representational system. In this paper, we analyze a psychometrically-based neurolinguistic method to classify the PRSs of software developers in an industrial setting. Our experimental evaluation of the approach is carried out in three combined experiments: (1) a study assesses the PRSs of industrial developers using a project's mailing lists; (2) a survey of software developers to establish their PRSs; and (3) a controlled experiment that carefully analyzes and visualizes strategies to perform software comprehension activities supported by a visualization tool. The results indicate that our approach can indeed be used to determine software developers' PRS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"153 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBES.2014.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SBES.2014.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

软件开发产生历史数据。近年来,研究人员一直在对邮件列表进行语言分析,以了解软件开发的复杂性。一种新的方法是使用神经语言学理论(NT)。NT假设每个人在每个特定的情境中使用一个首选的表征认知系统(PRS)。因此,尽管每个软件开发人员使用各种各样的表示系统来理解软件,但每个人都有他或她自己喜欢的表示系统。在本文中,我们分析了一种基于心理测量学的神经语言学方法来对工业环境中的软件开发人员的prs进行分类。我们通过三个组合实验对该方法进行了实验评估:(1)研究使用项目的邮件列表评估工业开发商的prs;(2)对软件开发人员进行调查,建立软件开发人员的社会责任体系;(3)一个对照实验,仔细分析和可视化策略,以执行可视化工具支持的软件理解活动。结果表明,我们的方法确实可以用于确定软件开发人员的PRS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Triangulating Experiments in an Industrial Setting to Evaluate Preferred Representational Systems of Software Developers
Software development results in historic data. In recent years, researchers have been conducting linguistic analyses of mailing lists to understand the intricacies of software development. A new approach for that is to use Neurolinguistic Theory (NT). NT postulates that each person uses a preferred representational cognitive system (PRS) in each specific context. Thus, although each software developer uses a variety of representational systems to understand software, each has his or her own preferred representational system. In this paper, we analyze a psychometrically-based neurolinguistic method to classify the PRSs of software developers in an industrial setting. Our experimental evaluation of the approach is carried out in three combined experiments: (1) a study assesses the PRSs of industrial developers using a project's mailing lists; (2) a survey of software developers to establish their PRSs; and (3) a controlled experiment that carefully analyzes and visualizes strategies to perform software comprehension activities supported by a visualization tool. The results indicate that our approach can indeed be used to determine software developers' PRS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信