康复专业人员的项目评估指南。

Advances in clinical rehabilitation Pub Date : 1990-01-01
R L Glueckauf
{"title":"康复专业人员的项目评估指南。","authors":"R L Glueckauf","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The overall purpose of the present chapter was to provide a set of guidelines to new rehabilitation investigators for conducting program evaluation in the burgeoning field of clinical rehabilitation. The specific objectives were to encourage investigators to develop a research consultation network, consider the benefits of utilizing a theoretical framework in specifying program objectives, assess program implementation, and to discuss the need and methods for ensuring high quality data. There is currently a widening gap in the United States and Canada between rehabilitation professionals who provide clinical services and those who conduct research on the effects of rehabilitation interventions. This is a matter of great concern and consequence. Without a firm commitment to evaluation, clinical rehabilitation practice may ultimately flounder in the mire of conjecture and ad hominem debate characteristic of therapeutic movements that have come and gone (e.g., the human potential movement). It is essential for the life of the discipline that rehabilitation programs be firmly grounded in both humanitarian and scientific principles.</p>","PeriodicalId":77658,"journal":{"name":"Advances in clinical rehabilitation","volume":"3 ","pages":"250-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Program evaluation guidelines for the rehabilitation professional.\",\"authors\":\"R L Glueckauf\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The overall purpose of the present chapter was to provide a set of guidelines to new rehabilitation investigators for conducting program evaluation in the burgeoning field of clinical rehabilitation. The specific objectives were to encourage investigators to develop a research consultation network, consider the benefits of utilizing a theoretical framework in specifying program objectives, assess program implementation, and to discuss the need and methods for ensuring high quality data. There is currently a widening gap in the United States and Canada between rehabilitation professionals who provide clinical services and those who conduct research on the effects of rehabilitation interventions. This is a matter of great concern and consequence. Without a firm commitment to evaluation, clinical rehabilitation practice may ultimately flounder in the mire of conjecture and ad hominem debate characteristic of therapeutic movements that have come and gone (e.g., the human potential movement). It is essential for the life of the discipline that rehabilitation programs be firmly grounded in both humanitarian and scientific principles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in clinical rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"250-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in clinical rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in clinical rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章的总体目的是为新的康复研究者提供一套指导方针,以便在新兴的临床康复领域进行项目评估。具体目标是鼓励研究者发展研究咨询网络,考虑在指定项目目标时使用理论框架的好处,评估项目实施,并讨论确保高质量数据的需求和方法。目前,在美国和加拿大,提供临床服务的康复专业人员与从事康复干预效果研究的康复专业人员之间的差距正在扩大。这是一个非常令人关切和严重的问题。如果没有对评估的坚定承诺,临床康复实践可能最终会在猜测和人身攻击辩论的泥潭中挣扎,这是治疗运动来了又去的特征(例如,人类潜能运动)。康复计划必须牢固地建立在人道主义和科学原则的基础上,这对该学科的生命至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Program evaluation guidelines for the rehabilitation professional.

The overall purpose of the present chapter was to provide a set of guidelines to new rehabilitation investigators for conducting program evaluation in the burgeoning field of clinical rehabilitation. The specific objectives were to encourage investigators to develop a research consultation network, consider the benefits of utilizing a theoretical framework in specifying program objectives, assess program implementation, and to discuss the need and methods for ensuring high quality data. There is currently a widening gap in the United States and Canada between rehabilitation professionals who provide clinical services and those who conduct research on the effects of rehabilitation interventions. This is a matter of great concern and consequence. Without a firm commitment to evaluation, clinical rehabilitation practice may ultimately flounder in the mire of conjecture and ad hominem debate characteristic of therapeutic movements that have come and gone (e.g., the human potential movement). It is essential for the life of the discipline that rehabilitation programs be firmly grounded in both humanitarian and scientific principles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信