{"title":"他们飞扬的话语:中世纪诗歌中可接受的冒犯的界限","authors":"Kyle Riper","doi":"10.7710/2168-0620.1141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The boundaries between verbal arguments and physical retribution are complicated and difficult to directly identify. This paper examines the points at which verbal sparring, conventionally dubbed “flyting,” turns to physical altercations. In identifying these points in \"Sir Gawain and the Green Knight\" and \"The Wife of Bath’s Prologue,\" I find that rhetoric turns to violence after affronts to particular morality-based identities. In my reading of \"Sir Gawain,\" I posit that the eponyms’ flyte and subsequent fight in the fourth fitt represent an attack on both the institution of King Arthur’s Knights of the Round Table and on Sir Gawain’s personhood. In Geoffrey Chaucer’s “The Wife of Bath,” I suggest a reading wherein the violence between Allison and Janekin represents a fight against the rhetoric of oppression. Throughout the essay, I show how physical retribution is, in these texts, an excusable method of defense against language, particularly when personal and political senses of honor are verbally attacked. Faculty Sponsor: Elizabeth E. Tavares","PeriodicalId":167127,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Them’s Flyting Words: The Boundaries of Acceptable Affronts in Medieval Poetry\",\"authors\":\"Kyle Riper\",\"doi\":\"10.7710/2168-0620.1141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The boundaries between verbal arguments and physical retribution are complicated and difficult to directly identify. This paper examines the points at which verbal sparring, conventionally dubbed “flyting,” turns to physical altercations. In identifying these points in \\\"Sir Gawain and the Green Knight\\\" and \\\"The Wife of Bath’s Prologue,\\\" I find that rhetoric turns to violence after affronts to particular morality-based identities. In my reading of \\\"Sir Gawain,\\\" I posit that the eponyms’ flyte and subsequent fight in the fourth fitt represent an attack on both the institution of King Arthur’s Knights of the Round Table and on Sir Gawain’s personhood. In Geoffrey Chaucer’s “The Wife of Bath,” I suggest a reading wherein the violence between Allison and Janekin represents a fight against the rhetoric of oppression. Throughout the essay, I show how physical retribution is, in these texts, an excusable method of defense against language, particularly when personal and political senses of honor are verbally attacked. Faculty Sponsor: Elizabeth E. Tavares\",\"PeriodicalId\":167127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7710/2168-0620.1141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7710/2168-0620.1141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
言语争吵和身体报复之间的界限很复杂,很难直接识别。这篇文章探讨了口头争吵,通常被称为“飞”,转向身体上的争吵。在《高文爵士与绿衣骑士》和《巴斯的妻子的序言》中,我发现,在冒犯了特定的基于道德的身份之后,修辞就变成了暴力。在我对《高文爵士》的阅读中,我认为在第四集中,两位主人公的打斗和随后的打斗代表了对亚瑟王圆桌骑士制度和高文爵士人格的攻击。在杰弗里·乔叟(Geoffrey Chaucer)的《巴斯的妻子》(The Wife of Bath)中,我建议读一篇文章,其中艾莉森和詹纳金之间的暴力代表了一场反对压迫言论的斗争。在整篇文章中,我展示了在这些文本中,身体报复是如何成为一种可原谅的防御语言的方法,特别是当个人和政治荣誉受到口头攻击时。教师赞助人:Elizabeth E. Tavares
Them’s Flyting Words: The Boundaries of Acceptable Affronts in Medieval Poetry
The boundaries between verbal arguments and physical retribution are complicated and difficult to directly identify. This paper examines the points at which verbal sparring, conventionally dubbed “flyting,” turns to physical altercations. In identifying these points in "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight" and "The Wife of Bath’s Prologue," I find that rhetoric turns to violence after affronts to particular morality-based identities. In my reading of "Sir Gawain," I posit that the eponyms’ flyte and subsequent fight in the fourth fitt represent an attack on both the institution of King Arthur’s Knights of the Round Table and on Sir Gawain’s personhood. In Geoffrey Chaucer’s “The Wife of Bath,” I suggest a reading wherein the violence between Allison and Janekin represents a fight against the rhetoric of oppression. Throughout the essay, I show how physical retribution is, in these texts, an excusable method of defense against language, particularly when personal and political senses of honor are verbally attacked. Faculty Sponsor: Elizabeth E. Tavares