J. Hummel, M. Figl, W. Birkfellner, C. Ede, R. Seemann, H. Bergmann
{"title":"柔性内窥镜的混合跟踪系统","authors":"J. Hummel, M. Figl, W. Birkfellner, C. Ede, R. Seemann, H. Bergmann","doi":"10.1117/12.534002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the miniaturization of electromagnetic tracking systems (EMTS) the range of possible applications in \nimage guided therapy was extending. A diameter smaller than 1 mm allows for mounting these sensors into \nthe working channel of flexible endoscopes for navigation within the body. Knowing the exact position of the \ninstrument with respect to the patient’s position preoperative CT or MR images can simplify and ease navigation \nduring various interventions. The Aurora EMTS seems to be an ideal choice for this purpose. However, using \nthis system exhibits an important limitation: the sensor offers just 5 degrees of freedom (DOF) which means that \nrotations round the axis of the sensor cannot be measured. To overcome this restriction we used an additional \noptical tracking system (OTS) which is calibrated to deliver the missing DOF. \nTo evaluate the suitability of our new navigation system we measured the Fiducial Registration Error (FRE) \nof the diverse registrations and the Target Registration Error (TRE) for the complete transformation from the US \nspace to the CT space. The FRE for the ultrasound calibration amounted to 3.2 mm±2.2 mm, resulting from \n10 calibration procedures. For the transformation from the OTS reference system to the EMTS emitter space \nwe found an average FRE of 0.8 mm±0.2 mm. The FRE for the CT registration was 1.0 mm±0.3 mm. \nThe TRE was found to be 5.5 mm± 3.2 mm.","PeriodicalId":302939,"journal":{"name":"Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid tracking system for flexible endoscopes\",\"authors\":\"J. Hummel, M. Figl, W. Birkfellner, C. Ede, R. Seemann, H. Bergmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.534002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the miniaturization of electromagnetic tracking systems (EMTS) the range of possible applications in \\nimage guided therapy was extending. A diameter smaller than 1 mm allows for mounting these sensors into \\nthe working channel of flexible endoscopes for navigation within the body. Knowing the exact position of the \\ninstrument with respect to the patient’s position preoperative CT or MR images can simplify and ease navigation \\nduring various interventions. The Aurora EMTS seems to be an ideal choice for this purpose. However, using \\nthis system exhibits an important limitation: the sensor offers just 5 degrees of freedom (DOF) which means that \\nrotations round the axis of the sensor cannot be measured. To overcome this restriction we used an additional \\noptical tracking system (OTS) which is calibrated to deliver the missing DOF. \\nTo evaluate the suitability of our new navigation system we measured the Fiducial Registration Error (FRE) \\nof the diverse registrations and the Target Registration Error (TRE) for the complete transformation from the US \\nspace to the CT space. The FRE for the ultrasound calibration amounted to 3.2 mm±2.2 mm, resulting from \\n10 calibration procedures. For the transformation from the OTS reference system to the EMTS emitter space \\nwe found an average FRE of 0.8 mm±0.2 mm. The FRE for the CT registration was 1.0 mm±0.3 mm. \\nThe TRE was found to be 5.5 mm± 3.2 mm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.534002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.534002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
With the miniaturization of electromagnetic tracking systems (EMTS) the range of possible applications in
image guided therapy was extending. A diameter smaller than 1 mm allows for mounting these sensors into
the working channel of flexible endoscopes for navigation within the body. Knowing the exact position of the
instrument with respect to the patient’s position preoperative CT or MR images can simplify and ease navigation
during various interventions. The Aurora EMTS seems to be an ideal choice for this purpose. However, using
this system exhibits an important limitation: the sensor offers just 5 degrees of freedom (DOF) which means that
rotations round the axis of the sensor cannot be measured. To overcome this restriction we used an additional
optical tracking system (OTS) which is calibrated to deliver the missing DOF.
To evaluate the suitability of our new navigation system we measured the Fiducial Registration Error (FRE)
of the diverse registrations and the Target Registration Error (TRE) for the complete transformation from the US
space to the CT space. The FRE for the ultrasound calibration amounted to 3.2 mm±2.2 mm, resulting from
10 calibration procedures. For the transformation from the OTS reference system to the EMTS emitter space
we found an average FRE of 0.8 mm±0.2 mm. The FRE for the CT registration was 1.0 mm±0.3 mm.
The TRE was found to be 5.5 mm± 3.2 mm.